2 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

 

Just to fact check the fact check... or more exactly the hyperbolic nature of the article about the volume in Miami.   They claimed that 107 dB was 'jet engine' territory.   That's not correct.   Jet engines, as I've seen documented, range from 140-160+ dB.  The Decibel scale is logarithmic.  Meaning, as the tweet suggests... every 3dB (slightly higher) is basically a doubling of the sound pressure involved in the creation of the sound.   In other words, 110dB is twice as loud as 107dB.  113 dB is twice as loud as 110dB.  So, a jet engine, being 140dB isn't remotely close to the level of 107dB.  That is why people working around those planes CONSTANTLY wear ear protection.  Exposure to that volume for just a brief period of time can have dire consequences on your hearing, especially long term.  

Every 10 decibels is 10X louder... Also, please note the 130dB is from 200 ft away, not standing right next to it.  According to the inverse square law, as you cut the distance in half, the pressure would quadruple.  Cutting the distance to a mere 50 ft, would take that decibel level from 130 dB to 16x louder... Roughly 142 dB.  

 

To give some 'strict' numbers to this....
107 dB is approximately 0.05Watts/m^2 of intensity.
142 dB is approximately 158 Watts/,^2 of intensity.

(that's over 3000x more intensity).  Not exactly 'jet engine' level at 107.  

 

I saw the rating for the Phillies game at 111 dB... and compared to 107, you might think they are close.   They are not.  111 dB is 0.125 Watts/m^2.  That's 2.5x more intensity.  In other words, CBP was more than TWICE as loud as the stadium in Miami, at least at the points where they were measured.

Going to be interesting to see what Fangio throws at us considering he worked with the Eagles offense all last year and knows just about everything there is to know

2 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Going to be interesting to see what Fangio throws at us considering he worked with the Eagles offense all last year and knows just about everything there is to know

Sadly, the Eagles' current coaching staff doesn't seem to know everything to know about the Eagles offense from last year.

4 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Just to fact check the fact check... or more exactly the hyperbolic nature of the article about the volume in Miami.   They claimed that 107 dB was 'jet engine' territory.   That's not correct.   Jet engines, as I've seen documented, range from 140-160+ dB.  The Decibel scale is logarithmic.  Meaning, as the tweet suggests... every 3dB (slightly higher) is basically a doubling of the sound pressure involved in the creation of the sound.   In other words, 110dB is twice as loud as 107dB.  113 dB is twice as loud as 110dB.  So, a jet engine, being 140dB isn't remotely close to the level of 107dB.  That is why people working around those planes CONSTANTLY wear ear protection.  Exposure to that volume for just a brief period of time can have dire consequences on your hearing, especially long term.  

Every 10 decibels is 10X louder... Also, please note the 130dB is from 200 ft away, not standing right next to it.  According to the inverse square law, as you cut the distance in half, the pressure would quadruple.  Cutting the distance to a mere 50 ft, would take that decibel level from 130 dB to 16x louder... Roughly 142 dB.  

 

To give some 'strict' numbers to this....
107 dB is approximately 0.05Watts/m^2 of intensity.
142 dB is approximately 158 Watts/,^2 of intensity.

(that's over 3000x more intensity).  Not exactly 'jet engine' level at 107.  

 

I saw the rating for the Phillies game at 111 dB... and compared to 107, you might think they are close.   They are not.  111 dB is 0.125 Watts/m^2.  That's 2.5x more intensity.  In other words, CBP was more than TWICE as loud as the stadium in Miami, at least at the points where they were measured.

Impressive post. You can drop a reference to the inverse square law while I'm sitting here like

4 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Just to fact check the fact check... or more exactly the hyperbolic nature of the article about the volume in Miami.   They claimed that 107 dB was 'jet engine' territory.   That's not correct.   Jet engines, as I've seen documented, range from 140-160+ dB.  The Decibel scale is logarithmic.  Meaning, as the tweet suggests... every 3dB (slightly higher) is basically a doubling of the sound pressure involved in the creation of the sound.   In other words, 110dB is twice as loud as 107dB.  113 dB is twice as loud as 110dB.  So, a jet engine, being 140dB isn't remotely close to the level of 107dB.  That is why people working around those planes CONSTANTLY wear ear protection.  Exposure to that volume for just a brief period of time can have dire consequences on your hearing, especially long term.  

Every 10 decibels is 10X louder... Also, please note the 130dB is from 200 ft away, not standing right next to it.  According to the inverse square law, as you cut the distance in half, the pressure would quadruple.  Cutting the distance to a mere 50 ft, would take that decibel level from 130 dB to 16x louder... Roughly 142 dB.  

 

To give some 'strict' numbers to this....
107 dB is approximately 0.05Watts/m^2 of intensity.
142 dB is approximately 158 Watts/,^2 of intensity.

(that's over 3000x more intensity).  Not exactly 'jet engine' level at 107.  

 

I saw the rating for the Phillies game at 111 dB... and compared to 107, you might think they are close.   They are not.  111 dB is 0.125 Watts/m^2.  That's 2.5x more intensity.  In other words, CBP was more than TWICE as loud as the stadium in Miami, at least at the points where they were measured.

Nerd.

Just now, Iggles_Phan said:

Just to fact check the fact check... or more exactly the hyperbolic nature of the article about the volume in Miami.   They claimed that 107 dB was 'jet engine' territory.   That's not correct.   Jet engines, as I've seen documented, range from 140-160+ dB.  The Decibel scale is logarithmic.  Meaning, as the tweet suggests... every 3dB (slightly higher) is basically a doubling of the sound pressure involved in the creation of the sound.   In other words, 110dB is twice as loud as 107dB.  113 dB is twice as loud as 110dB.  So, a jet engine, being 140dB isn't remotely close to the level of 107dB.  That is why people working around those planes CONSTANTLY wear ear protection.  Exposure to that volume for just a brief period of time can have dire consequences on your hearing, especially long term.  

Every 10 decibels is 10X louder... Also, please note the 130dB is from 200 ft away, not standing right next to it.  According to the inverse square law, as you cut the distance in half, the pressure would quadruple.  Cutting the distance to a mere 50 ft, would take that decibel level from 130 dB to 16x louder... Roughly 142 dB.  

 

To give some 'strict' numbers to this....
107 dB is approximately 0.05Watts/m^2 of intensity.
142 dB is approximately 158 Watts/,^2 of intensity.

(that's over 3000x more intensity).  Not exactly 'jet engine' level at 107.  

 

I saw the rating for the Phillies game at 111 dB... and compared to 107, you might think they are close.   They are not.  111 dB is 0.125 Watts/m^2.  That's 2.5x more intensity.  In other words, CBP was more than TWICE as loud as the stadium in Miami, at least at the points where they were measured.

Even the science stuff aside, Miami is a dome stadium with a WBC crowd. Yea, its going to be loud, but that's a neutral field and more ambient noise. I think it's going to be just a little different psychologically with 45,000+ fans making noise directed only at you.

I didn’t see this yesterday, but LOL. 

Get out of here with this BS. 

1 minute ago, Captain F said:

Nerd.

Just now, ManuManu said:

I didn’t see this yesterday, but LOL. 

Get out of here with this BS. 

Hearing that PC yesterday live during that portion was hilarious.  So clever.

11 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Just to fact check the fact check... or more exactly the hyperbolic nature of the article about the volume in Miami.   They claimed that 107 dB was 'jet engine' territory.   That's not correct.   Jet engines, as I've seen documented, range from 140-160+ dB.  The Decibel scale is logarithmic.  Meaning, as the tweet suggests... every 3dB (slightly higher) is basically a doubling of the sound pressure involved in the creation of the sound.   In other words, 110dB is twice as loud as 107dB.  113 dB is twice as loud as 110dB.  So, a jet engine, being 140dB isn't remotely close to the level of 107dB.  That is why people working around those planes CONSTANTLY wear ear protection.  Exposure to that volume for just a brief period of time can have dire consequences on your hearing, especially long term.  

Every 10 decibels is 10X louder... Also, please note the 130dB is from 200 ft away, not standing right next to it.  According to the inverse square law, as you cut the distance in half, the pressure would quadruple.  Cutting the distance to a mere 50 ft, would take that decibel level from 130 dB to 16x louder... Roughly 142 dB.  

 

To give some 'strict' numbers to this....
107 dB is approximately 0.05Watts/m^2 of intensity.
142 dB is approximately 158 Watts/,^2 of intensity.

(that's over 3000x more intensity).  Not exactly 'jet engine' level at 107.  

 

I saw the rating for the Phillies game at 111 dB... and compared to 107, you might think they are close.   They are not.  111 dB is 0.125 Watts/m^2.  That's 2.5x more intensity.  In other words, CBP was more than TWICE as loud as the stadium in Miami, at least at the points where they were measured.

14 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Just to fact check the fact check... or more exactly the hyperbolic nature of the article about the volume in Miami.   They claimed that 107 dB was 'jet engine' territory.   That's not correct.   Jet engines, as I've seen documented, range from 140-160+ dB.  The Decibel scale is logarithmic.  Meaning, as the tweet suggests... every 3dB (slightly higher) is basically a doubling of the sound pressure involved in the creation of the sound.   In other words, 110dB is twice as loud as 107dB.  113 dB is twice as loud as 110dB.  So, a jet engine, being 140dB isn't remotely close to the level of 107dB.  That is why people working around those planes CONSTANTLY wear ear protection.  Exposure to that volume for just a brief period of time can have dire consequences on your hearing, especially long term.  

Every 10 decibels is 10X louder... Also, please note the 130dB is from 200 ft away, not standing right next to it.  According to the inverse square law, as you cut the distance in half, the pressure would quadruple.  Cutting the distance to a mere 50 ft, would take that decibel level from 130 dB to 16x louder... Roughly 142 dB.  

 

To give some 'strict' numbers to this....
107 dB is approximately 0.05Watts/m^2 of intensity.
142 dB is approximately 158 Watts/,^2 of intensity.

(that's over 3000x more intensity).  Not exactly 'jet engine' level at 107.  

 

I saw the rating for the Phillies game at 111 dB... and compared to 107, you might think they are close.   They are not.  111 dB is 0.125 Watts/m^2.  That's 2.5x more intensity.  In other words, CBP was more than TWICE as loud as the stadium in Miami, at least at the points where they were measured.

Aww man...I don't come here to LEARN!

1 hour ago, mattwill said:

Do you have a prediction of your own that you want to add to the mix?

Eagles Win... Dolphins lose!

Miami allowing 141 rush yards a game as visiting team.  We should run 40 times at least.  I'd be happy with a 45-25 run/pass ratio.

42 minutes ago, RLC said:

Thing is...he's right. 

4 minutes ago, Freshmilk said:

Miami allowing 141 rush yards a game as visiting team.  We should run 40 times at least.  I'd be happy with a 45-25 run/pass ratio.

Exactly. Best way to beat their O is to limit their possessions.

5 minutes ago, Outlaw said:

Aww man...I don't come here to LEARN!

14 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

I didn’t see this yesterday, but LOL. 

Get out of here with this BS. 

Dont want to give anything away for the next time you have to let someone score

(Thinking man gif)

24 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Going to be interesting to see what Fangio throws at us considering he worked with the Eagles offense all last year and knows just about everything there is to know

Hopefully CB's 8 yards off of the receivers and soft coverages on third and short.  

27 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Going to be interesting to see what Fangio throws at us considering he worked with the Eagles offense all last year and knows just about everything there is to know

During the Super Bowl week, he worked with the offense with how he would attack them and how he thought the chiefs might. So I think the Eagles also know what he wants to do against them.

9 minutes ago, Outlaw said:

Exactly. Best way to beat their O is to limit their possessions.

The team also needs to win the turnover battle while also converting red zone opportunities.  Field position will be importand as well during the game.  The better the field position, the easier it is to score.  Winning will take getting more points than the Dolphins by the end of the 4th quarter.  That means they have to win in every phaze of the game.  

Just now, NCiggles said:

The team also needs to win the turnover battle while also converting red zone opportunities.  Field position will be importand as well during the game.  The better the field position, the easier it is to score.  Winning will take getting more points than the Dolphins by the end of the 4th quarter.  That means they have to win in every phaze of the game.  

5 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

During the Super Bowl week, he worked with the offense with how he would attack them and how he thought the chiefs might. So I think the Eagles also know what he wants to do against them.

He was with them all year, not just the SB

2 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

He was with them all year, not just the SB

So was Gannon... except for the SB.

19 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

Hopefully CB's 8 yards off of the receivers and soft coverages on third and short.  

Light boxes and safeties in outer space…

42 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

I didn’t see this yesterday, but LOL. 

Get out of here with this BS. 

They probably did.  But he needs to just say a simple "no" instead of BS-ing it.