Jump to content

Featured Replies

7 minutes ago, DiPros said:

Its a nothing burger.  They filed a complaint WITHOUT providing any evidence.  More of the same from these pathetic losers!

She's pretty much admitted it.

21 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Don't even know what this is about or what she did but I don't give a ish about Fani Willis if you think I'm gonna die on a hill defending her.

"I don't really care what she did or does, she was sent by God to save America from Trump!"....

 

 

....no?

1 minute ago, The_Omega said:

She's pretty much admitted it.

Oh, that matters now? 

9 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

She's pretty much admitted it.

Neither confirming or denying it is admitting it?   OK  

  • Author
9 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

Like any other person that may be proven guilty of something, she should be penalized based on what the law says. It's laughable but not unexpected you think someone else doing something wrong exonerates Trump.

 

Now get back to your Pee Wee "I know you are but what am I" impersonation like the tired old fool you are.

When the prosecutor is engaged in egregious misconduct like this - it calls the case against the defendant into question.   If a paramour of a prosecutor is making a bundle off the case illegally, it should be be dismissed, which is tantamount to an exoneration.  Not a very difficult concept to comprehend.

  • Author
Just now, DiPros said:

Neither confirming or denying it is admitting it?   OK  

She is a government attorney and failed to deny it.  Yes, that is tantamount to an admission.

 

  • Author
11 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

Oh, that matters now? 

Yes, it does.

Just now, Procus said:

When the prosecutor is engaged in egregious misconduct like this - it calls the case against the defendant into question.   If a paramour of a prosecutor is making a bundle off the case illegally, it should be be dismissed, which is tantamount to an exoneration.  Not a very difficult concept to comprehend.

 

Theoretical question...let's say you knew Trump was guilty of all or most of the things he was accused of, but managed to get off due to technicalities. Would you celebrate that?

Just now, Procus said:

Yes, it does.

Now it matters? But in other cases it doesn't? What's the breaking point for you, the color shirt the person wears?

1 minute ago, DiPros said:

Neither confirming or denying it is admitting it?   OK  

When your only defense is calling those making the claims racist, then trying to argue that you need to be able to get away with your bad behavior then yeah, that's pretty much an admission. That's not saying anything will come of it though.

  • Author
4 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

Theoretical question...let's say you knew Trump was guilty of all or most of the things he was accused of, but managed to get off due to technicalities. Would you celebrate that?

Absolutely not.  But your question is hypothetical and not factually correct.

4 minutes ago, Procus said:

it calls the case against the defendant into question

:lol: he's literally on tape asking Rafensberger for 12k more votes. You sad sacks are gonna have to watch your hero be found guilty and it's gonna be hilarious knowing you'll be crying yourselves to sleep every night for the rest of your lives. Oh man, I can't wait.

  • Author
2 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

When your only defense is calling those making the claims racist, then trying to argue that you need to be able to get away with your bad behavior then yeah, that's pretty much an admission. That's not saying anything will come of it though.

Oh, I suspect something will come of it.

1 minute ago, Procus said:

Absolutely not.  But your question is hypothetical and not factually correct.

BS. Why tell such an unbelievable lie to strangers?

  • Author
Just now, Boogyman said:

BS. Why tell such an unbelievable lie to strangers?

Lie?  Do tell Booger - we're all ears on how an election dispute constitutes a violation of RICO

Just now, Procus said:

Lie?  Do tell Booger - we're all ears on how an election dispute constitutes a violation of RICO

You are a sad little fraud lmao. 

4 minutes ago, Procus said:

Lie?  Do tell Booger - we're all ears on how an election dispute constitutes a violation of RICO

Coordinating with party officials in multiple states (including Georgia) to submit false slates of electors to fraudulently overturn the results of the election. He's absolutely F'ed, I know it, you know it, and make no mistake, he does too. 

Fani Willis acting inappropriately, has no bearing on the crimes of the Donald.

Just now, we_gotta_believe said:

Coordinating with party officials in multiple states (including Georgia) to submit false slates of electors to fraudulently overturn the results of the election. He's absolutely F'ed, I know it, you know it, and make no mistake, he does too. 

Procus and the rest of his herd doesn't care if he did anything illegal or not.

sheetlibs are really like "Fani Willis, never heard of her, I don't even understand what this thread is about." :lol: 

  • Author
13 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

You are a sad little fraud lmao. 

How so CNN watcher?

10 minutes ago, Toastrel said:

Fani Willis acting inappropriately, has no bearing on the crimes of the Donald.

She receives at least 2 death threats a week.  Is called the n word on the regular.  It's their MO to go after the ones bringing the charges.  Do THEY think this will change my mind in any way shape of form of what kind of person he and his cronies are AND have done?  So, the judge might throw her off and someone else will take her place.  All part of it, to delay, delay, delay.  He's working really hard on all these indictments; how will he have time to govern the country? He won't. 

Edit to add:  See in the other thread, he just lost another cronie

3 minutes ago, DiPros said:

She receives at least 2 death threats a week.  Is called the n word on the regular.  It's their MO to go after the ones bringing the charges.  Do THEY think this will change my mind in any way shape of form of what kind of person he and his cronies are AND have done? 

No, they aren't trying to convert the true sheeple. Just the people with pulses and IQs above room temp who understand that corruption of this magnitude completely exonerates Trump. 

Create an account or sign in to comment