March 13, 20241 yr 39 minutes ago, NJWolverEagle11 said: You that's a Hurts thing or a scheme thing? Maybe both due to loss of trust in Quez? Have wondered that myself...could really be a Hurts thing but hard to say when the HC openly states that Brown, Smith and Goedert are the guys.
March 13, 20241 yr 36 minutes ago, Cochis_Calhoun said: None of those guys put up markedly better numbers than Parker with better QB's than Mac Jones throwing them the ball last year. I'm just looking at upside or reliability. Parker is at the bottom of the list, on that list of guys. IMO, anyway.
March 13, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, EaglesAddict said: Have wondered that myself...could really be a Hurts thing but hard to say when the HC openly states that Brown, Smith and Goedert are the guys. Hoping that Moore can fix the issue there. But early in 22 Quez was getting looks till the WAS game when he got bullied for the interception then had that fumble so wouldn't surprise me if they're over Quez
March 13, 20241 yr I don't know how anyone can be upset with a 1-year-deal signing. If he makes the team and winds up contributing, great. If he sucks and rides the bench or is cut, there are no long-term financial ramifications.
March 13, 20241 yr 10 hours ago, weko said: The last 4 years he has been dead last in the NFL in separation. Maybe he can help in the red zone and in moving the chains on shorter throws
March 14, 20241 yr 17 hours ago, Kz! said: I don't know how anyone can be upset with a 1-year-deal signing. If he makes the team and winds up contributing, great. If he sucks and rides the bench or is cut, there are no long-term financial ramifications. Clearly just kicking the tires based on past interests. Very well may not even make the team.
March 14, 20241 yr I think they signed him to boost the confidence of our CBs in camp. We might have found a WR Bradberry can cover.
March 16, 20241 yr 22 hours ago, Swimm said: Garbage. We need a Slot WR and this aint it. True but if he’s WR #4 as an option on the outside then that’s fine.
March 17, 20241 yr 15 hours ago, UK_EaglesFan89 said: True but if he’s WR #4 as an option on the outside then that’s fine. Who’s WR 3, because we don’t really have that guy on the roster yet.
March 17, 20241 yr 16 hours ago, EazyEaglez said: Who’s WR 3, because we don’t really have that guy on the roster yet. I agree we don’t… But just because he’s on the roster right now doesn’t mean he is or would be WR 3 by the time September comes around.
March 18, 20241 yr 7 hours ago, UK_EaglesFan89 said: I agree we don’t… But just because he’s on the roster right now doesn’t mean he is or would be WR 3 by the time September comes around. Overall this feels like a signing two years too late.
March 18, 20241 yr 10 hours ago, EazyEaglez said: Overall this feels like a signing two years too late. I don’t disagree with that bud but as long as he’s WR 4 I’m good with it. In fact as WR 4 I’d say that’s really quite good. We needed a bit of depth on the outside.
March 19, 20241 yr A lot of money for a guy that’s only had 1k once in his career but at least it’s just a 1 year rental.
March 20, 20241 yr 8 hours ago, xxeaglesfanxx said: A lot of money for a guy that’s only had 1k once in his career but at least it’s just a 1 year rental. They're only on the hook for $1.2M which is barely above the vet minimum of $915K. Signing this guy doesn't mean he's guaranteed anything let alone the WR3 position. Its just vet depth. I don't get anyone having any issue with this signing for how low the cap impact is. I think they go WR with one of the 2nd round picks or the 4th round pick in the draft.
March 20, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, John Blutarski said: They're only on the hook for $1.2M which is barely above the vet minimum of $915K. Signing this guy doesn't mean he's guaranteed anything let alone the WR3 position. Its just vet depth. I don't get anyone having any issue with this signing for how low the cap impact is. I think they go WR with one of the 2nd round picks or the 4th round pick in the draft. $915k is vet minimum for a player with 1 year in the league, the vet minimum for a player of Parker's seniority is ~ $1.2million.
March 20, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, Cochis_Calhoun said: $915k is vet minimum for a player with 1 year in the league, the vet minimum for a player of Parker's seniority is ~ $1.2million. Thanks for correcting me.
Create an account or sign in to comment