August 25, 20241 yr 4 hours ago, Procus said: Thank this man - it rose after he announced interest rate cuts are coming. You need to follow the news. Cool that you acknowledge the economy under Trump had nothing to do with him.
August 26, 20241 yr 18 hours ago, Procus said: Thank this man - it rose after he announced interest rate cuts are coming. You need to follow the news. don't forget that your daddy is disgusted to see the stock market doing so well and wishes it would crash so his opponent looks bad. and you support it in classic, fanboy fashion.
September 2, 20241 yr "Democrats" aren't leading anything. Countries that don't have a 1st amendment who are clumsily trying to figure out the government's role (if any) in combating the stupidity of its own populations are engaging in extreme acts of censorship. It's also being misreported purposely by right wing outlets. The issue in Brazil is manufactured by Musk and Twitter - Twitter is suspended because they refused to comply with a court ordered mandate to name a legal representative. Musk pretty much purposely didn't so he can now claim to be the "victim" of censorship - which has nothing to do with the case. The issues in the UK are more problematic. The online safety law they passed is overly broad with its new offenses around transmission of misinformation. So far it's been applied in some cases that make sense (such as one case where a person was encouraging followers online to torch an apartment building housing refugees - this seems at least arguably criminal to me as incitement) and others that are overreaches and threaten free speech. But it's worth noting that as with other issues (such as gun rights), these laws should be viewed with cultural differences in mind. American style freedom of speech is not something that is assured by the British government, nor is the government having a role in policing such speech an uncommon belief among Britons. Personally I find it very bothersome, but it's also worth noting that Britons overwhelmingly voted in the party that most supports these laws in their most recent election, pushing back on right-wing extremism. I certainly don't love it. But criticizing American Democrats for actions taken by foreign governments is pretty preposterous.
September 2, 20241 yr 8 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: "Democrats" aren't leading anything. Countries that don't have a 1st amendment who are clumsily trying to figure out the government's role (if any) in combating the stupidity of its own populations are engaging in extreme acts of censorship. It's also being misreported purposely by right wing outlets. The issue in Brazil is manufactured by Musk and Twitter - Twitter is suspended because they refused to comply with a court ordered mandate to name a legal representative. Musk pretty much purposely didn't so he can now claim to be the "victim" of censorship - which has nothing to do with the case. The issues in the UK are more problematic. The online safety law they passed is overly broad with its new offenses around transmission of misinformation. So far it's been applied in some cases that make sense (such as one case where a person was encouraging followers online to torch an apartment building housing refugees - this seems at least arguably criminal to me as incitement) and others that are overreaches and threaten free speech. But it's worth noting that as with other issues (such as gun rights), these laws should be viewed with cultural differences in mind. American style freedom of speech is not something that is assured by the British government, nor is the government having a role in policing such speech an uncommon belief among Britons. Personally I find it very bothersome, but it's also worth noting that Britons overwhelmingly voted in the party that most supports these laws in their most recent election, pushing back on right-wing extremism. I certainly don't love it. But criticizing American Democrats for actions taken by foreign governments is pretty preposterous. Sadly, since this won't fit on a bumper sticker, the cucks won't read it.
September 2, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, JohnSnowsHair said: "Democrats" aren't leading anything. Countries that don't have a 1st amendment who are clumsily trying to figure out the government's role (if any) in combating the stupidity of its own populations are engaging in extreme acts of censorship. It's also being misreported purposely by right wing outlets. The issue in Brazil is manufactured by Musk and Twitter - Twitter is suspended because they refused to comply with a court ordered mandate to name a legal representative. Musk pretty much purposely didn't so he can now claim to be the "victim" of censorship - which has nothing to do with the case. The issues in the UK are more problematic. The online safety law they passed is overly broad with its new offenses around transmission of misinformation. So far it's been applied in some cases that make sense (such as one case where a person was encouraging followers online to torch an apartment building housing refugees - this seems at least arguably criminal to me as incitement) and others that are overreaches and threaten free speech. But it's worth noting that as with other issues (such as gun rights), these laws should be viewed with cultural differences in mind. American style freedom of speech is not something that is assured by the British government, nor is the government having a role in policing such speech an uncommon belief among Britons. Personally I find it very bothersome, but it's also worth noting that Britons overwhelmingly voted in the party that most supports these laws in their most recent election, pushing back on right-wing extremism. I certainly don't love it. But criticizing American Democrats for actions taken by foreign governments is pretty preposterous. The same people whi think Fauci and democrat city governors shut down the entire world for the pandemic? Yeah those people aren't very smart.
September 11, 20241 yr 29 minutes ago, toolg said: AOC can jumpstart my battery *cough* no panties *cough*
September 11, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, toolg said: AOC can jumpstart my battery President Harris needs to get her a cabinet position. We need to see more of her!
September 12, 20241 yr Courtesy of Trump, the GOP is on track for more and more losing. They scream about things, but the numbers tell a different story. Facts and the new GOP do not mix. As lame as the Democratic party has been, they are light years ahead of the Trump cuck-tarded base.
September 18, 20241 yr Author Watch Tulsi Gabbard explain how many in the Democratic Party are finally waking up to all the bs in their party. No, most of the Dems here aren't intelligent enough for that, but most of the Dems here are just a fringe element anyway. https://rumble.com/v5fdkcl-tulsi-gabbard-tells-glenn-beck-that-many-democrats-are-finally-waking-up.html
September 18, 20241 yr 13 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Oh c'mon! Tulsi Gabbard explaining to Glenn Beck? During Clarence Thomas appreciation week? On 9/12/2024 at 12:11 PM, Toastrel said: Courtesy of Trump, the GOP is on track for more and more losing. They scream about things, but the numbers tell a different story. Facts and the new GOP do not mix. As lame as the Democratic party has been, they are light years ahead of the Trump cuck-tarded base. The numbers are fake. Crime rates are what your gut says they are.
Create an account or sign in to comment