January 10Jan 10 Just now, PackerNation said: Oh, my bad. But I guess I was wondering why you are mad I "throw out" the "results" of week 1? The turnover thing is something I feel will decide THIS game Sunday. Did you want a parade for a 29-34 victory 4 months ago? Let's see what happens on the grass Sunday. Then we can discuss "results." By the way, is it Bermuda grass at the Linc? Or a Hybrid turf? Not sure if they changed it out since I was there last in 2016. Great game that night. Where are you getting this idea I’m mad? I even said I agreed with you that the RESULTS (just wanted to make sure you read that correctly) don’t matter now. I just find it funny that you think Hurts’ turnovers from then are somehow relevant now.
January 10Jan 10 16 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said: Where are you getting this idea I’m mad? I even said I agreed with you that the RESULTS (just wanted to make sure you read that correctly) don’t matter now. I just find it funny that you think Hurts’ turnovers from then are somehow relevant now. Why are you arguing with this guy?
January 10Jan 10 12 minutes ago, NYEagle said: Why are you arguing with this guy? Bored I guess lol. I’m sure he’s trolling.
January 10Jan 10 8 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said: Bored I guess lol. I’m sure he’s trolling. How is coming to the opposing teams fan forum on game week "trolling"? I stop at a couple fan forums during the season. Let's see, I was on the Texans board, the Rams board, and this board. Odd that only those on this board get triggered over me stopping by. Oh well, after I gloat or congratulate on Sunday, you will never see me again. This place kinda blows. Lmmfao
January 10Jan 10 18 minutes ago, PackerNation said: How is coming to the opposing teams fan forum on game week "trolling"? I stop at a couple fan forums during the season. Let's see, I was on the Texans board, the Rams board, and this board. Odd that only those on this board get triggered over me stopping by. Oh well, after I gloat or congratulate on Sunday, you will never see me again. This place kinda blows. Lmmfao Well, for starters, you’ve mentioned going to Packer games since you were a child in the 70’s. I would estimate that puts you in the mid 50’s to early 60’s age bracket, and yet you come across like an immature teenager. Next, you mentioned trying to stop 4 WRs and 2 TEs on every play. Aside from a lack of reading skills, that also puts your math skills in question, unless you plan to play with 5 linemen and no QB or RB. Or, you plan to play with either a QB or RB and only 4 linemen. Or you plan to play with a QB and RB and 3 linemen. All of which we’re good with BTW. So, it would seem that you’re either really stupid, or you’re just trolling. Which is it?
January 10Jan 10 1 hour ago, EagleJoe8 said: Well, for starters, you’ve mentioned going to Packer games since you were a child in the 70’s. I would estimate that puts you in the mid 50’s to early 60’s age bracket, and yet you come across like an immature teenager. Next, you mentioned trying to stop 4 WRs and 2 TEs on every play. Aside from a lack of reading skills, that also puts your math skills in question, unless you plan to play with 5 linemen and no QB or RB. Or, you plan to play with either a QB or RB and only 4 linemen. Or you plan to play with a QB and RB and 3 linemen. All of which we’re good with BTW. So, it would seem that you’re either really stupid, or you’re just trolling. Which is it? I am a young 54. My wife is 38 and keeps me young, or so she tells me. I may have not worded it well or articulated the 4 wide WR sets or the 2 TE sets. My apology if so. I was like 8 Eastside Darks deep last nite when I stopped here while watching the PSU and ND game. Lakefront Brewery makes fantastic beer. Wisconsin has like 350 breweries. The beer capital of the world. Anyway, most teams use 2 outside WRs, a slot and one TE in most of their personnel groupings. The Packers use a lot of 12 personnel. 12 personnel is 1 RB and 2 TEs, hence 12. Why I brought this up is, the Packers D can take away Brown and Smith. Saquon is the only other worry. If you watched the week 1 game, Hurts was contained in the pocket all game. The Packers are not going to let him run. I don't think Kellen Moore wants him running anyhow with his concussion issues, but I digress. The Eagles have to worry about Romeo, Reed, Wicks, Heath, Kraft & Musgrave. And yes, the Packers go 5 wide as well at times. Obviously if you go 4 or 5 wide you don't have 2 TEs on the field. Sometimes you have no TEs on field. And RBs can line up wide as well. And once you worry about the multiple WRs, and TEs, the beast Josh Jacobs is ready to walk over the Eagles DL, LBs, and safeties. Using words like "stupid" is actual "trolling" and obviously you and others here are projecting. I get it, you are not used to fans of other teams coming here without an agenda. I am not like other fans, trust me.
January 10Jan 10 I don't care if they need to wheel AJ out there in a wheelchair, he must be on the field!
January 10Jan 10 1 hour ago, PackerNation said: I am a young 54. My wife is 38 and keeps me young, or so she tells me. I may have not worded it well or articulated the 4 wide WR sets or the 2 TE sets. My apology if so. I was like 8 Eastside Darks deep last nite when I stopped here while watching the PSU and ND game. Lakefront Brewery makes fantastic beer. Wisconsin has like 350 breweries. The beer capital of the world. Anyway, most teams use 2 outside WRs, a slot and one TE in most of their personnel groupings. The Packers use a lot of 12 personnel. 12 personnel is 1 RB and 2 TEs, hence 12. Why I brought this up is, the Packers D can take away Brown and Smith. Saquon is the only other worry. If you watched the week 1 game, Hurts was contained in the pocket all game. The Packers are not going to let him run. I don't think Kellen Moore wants him running anyhow with his concussion issues, but I digress. The Eagles have to worry about Romeo, Reed, Wicks, Heath, Kraft & Musgrave. And yes, the Packers go 5 wide as well at times. Obviously if you go 4 or 5 wide you don't have 2 TEs on the field. Sometimes you have no TEs on field. And RBs can line up wide as well. And once you worry about the multiple WRs, and TEs, the beast Josh Jacobs is ready to walk over the Eagles DL, LBs, and safeties. Using words like "stupid" is actual "trolling" and obviously you and others here are projecting. I get it, you are not used to fans of other teams coming here without an agenda. I am not like other fans, trust me. You realize that any data you have compiled from game 1 should be thrown in the garbage, right? Very very few teams are what they are from week one. You think the D they showed week 1 is anything close to what we have evolved into? If you do, you're gonna be in for a huge surprise. You guys lost to every playoff team you've face except the Rams who were without Puka and Kupp.
January 10Jan 10 1 hour ago, PackerNation said: I am a young 54. My wife is 38 and keeps me young, or so she tells me. I may have not worded it well or articulated the 4 wide WR sets or the 2 TE sets. My apology if so. I was like 8 Eastside Darks deep last nite when I stopped here while watching the PSU and ND game. Lakefront Brewery makes fantastic beer. Wisconsin has like 350 breweries. The beer capital of the world. Anyway, most teams use 2 outside WRs, a slot and one TE in most of their personnel groupings. The Packers use a lot of 12 personnel. 12 personnel is 1 RB and 2 TEs, hence 12. Why I brought this up is, the Packers D can take away Brown and Smith. Saquon is the only other worry. If you watched the week 1 game, Hurts was contained in the pocket all game. The Packers are not going to let him run. I don't think Kellen Moore wants him running anyhow with his concussion issues, but I digress. The Eagles have to worry about Romeo, Reed, Wicks, Heath, Kraft & Musgrave. And yes, the Packers go 5 wide as well at times. Obviously if you go 4 or 5 wide you don't have 2 TEs on the field. Sometimes you have no TEs on field. And RBs can line up wide as well. And once you worry about the multiple WRs, and TEs, the beast Josh Jacobs is ready to walk over the Eagles DL, LBs, and safeties. Using words like "stupid" is actual "trolling" and obviously you and others here are projecting. I get it, you are not used to fans of other teams coming here without an agenda. I am not like other fans, trust me. I'll f your fat ugly wife after the game
January 10Jan 10 40 minutes ago, Portyansky said: You realize that any data you have compiled from game 1 should be thrown in the garbage, right? Very very few teams are what they are from week one. You think the D they showed week 1 is anything close to what we have evolved into? If you do, you're gonna be in for a huge surprise. You guys lost to every playoff team you've face except the Rams who were without Puka and Kupp. Yes, if you read all of page 3 and 4 of this thread, you will see that I stated several times the Brazil game is meaningless. I also stated that BOTH teams are completely different now. The reason the week 1 game is mentioned by me was in response to someone who was mad I was "throwing out" the week one game. And you are clueless if you think ANY regular season game, or wins and losses of those games matter in ANY way once the playoffs start. Again, every team is 0-0 right now. You are also clueless for bringing up injuries the Rams had. The Packers also had players out for the Rams game. But keep obsessing on the regular season. lol. Should I bring up the fact that the Packers are depleted and use that as excuse if the Packers lose Sunday? I never in my life have used injuries or officials as excuses for losses. Go cry about the Rams injuries more fool. Lmmfao.
January 10Jan 10 9 hours ago, PackerNation said: Yeah, I came to a Eagles fan forum the week the Packers are playing the Eagles in the playoffs and I am not a Packers fan. Are my Packers season tickets(both the Green and Gold package tickets. Gold is the package from Milwaukee, where they played 3 games a season until 1994) also all part of the plan? Keep in mind, I would have had to start this plan in the 70s when I was a young child going to Packers games with my father. After my father passed, the season tickets were transferred to my name. All this to "troll" a Eagles fan forum decades later during the playoffs. Cool story bruh, you really should get out more. I will pray for you. Back to the game... J-Love has a cannon arm and a quick release, this will be quite helpful Sunday. Oh, so you're just an idiot then.
January 10Jan 10 4 hours ago, PackerNation said: How is coming to the opposing teams fan forum on game week "trolling"? I stop at a couple fan forums during the season. Let's see, I was on the Texans board, the Rams board, and this board. Odd that only those on this board get triggered over me stopping by. Oh well, after I gloat or congratulate on Sunday, you will never see me again. This place kinda blows. Lmmfao We welcome fans from other teams that post good content, even a Cowboys fan who is respected and we hate the Cowboys. It's you, you're the problem. Your posts suck and you sound like a moron and a homer. Talking about 9 people catching passes, when a couple RBs get a 1 yard screen pass. Oh no, we're scared!
January 10Jan 10 2 hours ago, PackerNation said: Yes, if you read all of page 3 and 4 of this thread, you will see that I stated several times the Brazil game is meaningless. I also stated that BOTH teams are completely different now. The reason the week 1 game is mentioned by me was in response to someone who was mad I was "throwing out" the week one game. And you are clueless if you think ANY regular season game, or wins and losses of those games matter in ANY way once the playoffs start. Again, every team is 0-0 right now. You are also clueless for bringing up injuries the Rams had. The Packers also had players out for the Rams game. But keep obsessing on the regular season. lol. Should I bring up the fact that the Packers are depleted and use that as excuse if the Packers lose Sunday? I never in my life have used injuries or officials as excuses for losses. Go cry about the Rams injuries more fool. Lmmfao. I guarantee you will not be back here after Sunday. 0-0 my a$$. That means all the injuries are meaningless since now it's a new season and all the replacement players are considered starters, right? Gtfoh regular season doesn't matter.... is that what they're feeding you in GB?
January 10Jan 10 I just hope you come back after the game There was a Commies fan that showed up the week we played them and I don't think he came back
January 10Jan 10 On 1/9/2025 at 8:28 AM, PackerNation said: Offense: Edge Packers 😂😂😂🤡🤡🤡🤡 Where's your 2000 yard rusher? Jordan love? Oh scary. Not. Our line is better then yours. Our WRs are better. RB better. And QB is a wash at worst. You're dreaming.
January 10Jan 10 5 minutes ago, PackerNation said: I am a young 54. My wife is 38 and keeps me young, or so she tells me. I may have not worded it well or articulated the 4 wide WR sets or the 2 TE sets. My apology if so. I was like 8 Eastside Darks deep last nite when I stopped here while watching the PSU and ND game. Lakefront Brewery makes fantastic beer. Wisconsin has like 350 breweries. The beer capital of the world. Anyway, most teams use 2 outside WRs, a slot and one TE in most of their personnel groupings. The Packers use a lot of 12 personnel. 12 personnel is 4 WRs, 2 TEs and 1 RB. Why I brought this up is, the Packers D can take away Brown and Smith. Saquon is the only other worry. If you watched the week 1 game, Hurts was contained in the pocket all game. The Packers are not going to let him run. I don't think Kellen Moore wants him running anyhow with his concussion issues, but I digress. The Eagles have to worry about Romeo, Reed, Wicks, Heath, Kraft & Musgrave. And yes, the Packers go 5 wide as well at times. And then you have the beast Josh Jacobs ready to walk over the Eagles DL, LBs, and safeties. Using words like "stupid" is actual "trolling" and obviously you and others here are projecting. I get it, you are not used to fans of other teams coming here without an agenda. I am not like other fans, trust me. 4 WRs, 2 TEs and 1 RB = 7 players + 1 QB = 8 Players So...last time I checked, you can only have 11 players on the field at one time. So do your run this wicked 12 formation with only 3 Offensive Linemen? We are definitely going to listen to and believe someone that can't add past 10 because he ran out of fat fingers and toes?
January 10Jan 10 51 minutes ago, NYEagle said: 4 WRs, 2 TEs and 1 RB = 7 players + 1 QB = 8 Players So...last time I checked, you can only have 11 players on the field at one time. So do your run this wicked 12 formation with only 3 Offensive Linemen? We are definitely going to listen to and believe someone that can't add past 10 because he ran out of fat fingers and toes? If you scroll up and read my actual comment it says nothing about 4 WRs in 12 personnel. 12 personnel uses 1 RB and 2 TEs, hence the number 12. My comment was obviously changed and it is hilarious that you felt the need to do that. I realize this forum is not a true representation of the Eagles fan base. My apologies to actual Eagles fans I know personally and have met over the years.
January 10Jan 10 I don't know why any of you are giving this clown the attention he somehow craves as a 54 year old. Packers will keep it interesting until the second half...Eagles score a late touchdown once the GB defense is worn down and take it 31-16.
January 10Jan 10 46 minutes ago, b_west3 said: I don't know why any of you are giving this clown the attention he somehow craves as a 54 year old. Packers will keep it interesting until the second half...Eagles score a late touchdown once the GB defense is worn down and take it 31-16. Cool beans, with your opinion on the final score and a nickel, you have a nickel. We will save this post of yours and see how it ages. Again, I let things be decided on the grass. That is where the game will be played, not in your precious feelings. Good luck with your personal predictions. You will need it. OneTeamOneNation PackerNation!
January 10Jan 10 1 minute ago, PackerNation said: Cool beans, with your opinion on the final score and a nickel, you have a nickel. We will save this post of yours and see how it ages. Again, I let things be decided on the grass. That is where the game will be played, not in your precious feelings. Good luck with your personal predictions. You will need it. OneTeamOneNation PackerNation! Speaking of nickels...how many defensive backs are in a nickel defense? 7? 13?
January 10Jan 10 4 minutes ago, b_west3 said: Speaking of nickels...how many defensive backs are in a nickel defense? 7? 13? Nickel has 5 DBs and Dime has 6 DBs. What would you like me to school you on next? Since you like numbers: How many QBs have the Eagles had over the last 35 years? The Packers have had 3. I got bored at 7, and stopped counting.
January 10Jan 10 6 minutes ago, PackerNation said: Nickel has 5 DBs and Dime has 6 DBs. What would you like me to school you on next? Since you like numbers: How many QBs have the Eagles had over the last 35 years? The Packers have had 3. I got bored at 7, and stopped counting. The 3 quarterback thing isn't the flex you think it is boomer groomer
January 10Jan 10 2 hours ago, Mike030270 said: I just hope you come back after the game There was a Commies fan that showed up the week we played them and I don't think he came back He was banished to RnR
January 10Jan 10 Just now, NOTW said: He was banished to RnR Yeah...I doubt he was real just like this guy...I'm sure he'll ghost himself come Sunday evening.
Create an account or sign in to comment