Road to Victory Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 https://theeagleswire.usatoday.com/2021/03/20/nick-foles-trade-eagles-destinations-bears-andy-dalton/Eagles could be a trade destination for Nick Foles as Bears look to move on from QB By Glenn Erby Jalen Hurts needs a backup at quarterback and the Bears happen to have a guy on the roster that does a really good job of making starters feel comfortable. According to John Clark via Jeremy Fowler, the Chicago Bears are looking to move on from Nick Foles after signing Andy Dalton to a one-year deal. With the Eagles only having one quarterback on the roster and 11 picks in April’s NFL draft, Philadelphia could be a comfortable landing spot for Foles as he looks to continue his playing career. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
time2rock Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 Not trading a pick for BDN. If he gets cut then sure he may make sense to sign. But we’re going to have an entirely new offense now so not like he has familiarity with it. The only thing he’ll have familiarity with are a few players and the weight room. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsb235 Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 10 minutes ago, time2rock said: Not trading a pick for BDN. If he gets cut then sure he may make sense to sign. But we’re going to have an entirely new offense now so not like he has familiarity with it. The only thing he’ll have familiarity with are a few players and the weight room. Bears save money if they can trade him, but it costs them money to cut him, so it makes more sense for them to just keep him. But they would send him to us for a seventh, so it makes sense for us to do that if we need a backup. But we only need a backup if we don't draft a qb at 6. So this might be a draft day deal. In any event, I don't see us signing a backup until after we draft at 6, unless it is someone on a vet minimum deal with no money gtd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
time2rock Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 1 hour ago, jsb235 said: Bears save money if they can trade him, but it costs them money to cut him, so it makes more sense for them to just keep him. But they would send him to us for a seventh, so it makes sense for us to do that if we need a backup. But we only need a backup if we don't draft a qb at 6. So this might be a draft day deal. In any event, I don't see us signing a backup until after we draft at 6, unless it is someone on a vet minimum deal with no money gtd. What does his current contract pay him? I thought it was like $8M. I doubt we’ll want to invest that much in a backup considering our cap situation. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsb235 Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 38 minutes ago, time2rock said: What does his current contract pay him? I thought it was like $8M. I doubt we’ll want to invest that much in a backup considering our cap situation. If they trade him we are only on the hook for $4 million the first year and $8 million the second, but none of it is gtd. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoconoDon Posted March 22, 2021 Share Posted March 22, 2021 Nick is a SB MVP, a hero in Philly, has a freaking statue in front of the Linc, and is in the NFL record books and the HOF about a half a dozen times for crazy individual records that should last quite a while and have never been all held by one guy at the same time before. That guy should simply retire from pro football. After all, what more could he possibly accomplish? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madriver Posted March 22, 2021 Share Posted March 22, 2021 13 hours ago, PoconoDon said: Nick is a SB MVP, a hero in Philly, has a freaking statue in front of the Linc, and is in the NFL record books and the HOF about a half a dozen times for crazy individual records that should last quite a while and have never been all held by one guy at the same time before. That guy should simply retire from pro football. After all, what more could he possibly accomplish? Agree. All these guys look at Brady and think they can play into their 40s now. I would hate to see Nick come back here and stink and end his career on a down note. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Road to Victory Posted March 22, 2021 Author Share Posted March 22, 2021 6 hours ago, Madriver said: Agree. All these guys look at Brady and think they can play into their 40s now. I would hate to see Nick come back here and stink and end his career on a down note. I’d rather see Nick back here than Joe Flacco. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eglz1 Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 I'd rather see a "second tier" draft pick as a backup. I doubt Nick will ever be worth more than he is now. A young low experience QB, if he gets some NFL video might be worth something at the end of 4 years. Besides, Howie may burst if he doesn't draft a Quarterback. Hmmm, now that I think about it ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UK_EaglesFan89 Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 No thanks. We should not be giving up any draft capital to get Foles or any back up QB for that matter. If he gets cut then OK fine I guess (I'm still not convinced) but we should not be trading to get him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Road to Victory Posted March 24, 2021 Author Share Posted March 24, 2021 10 hours ago, UK_EaglesFan89 said: No thanks. We should not be giving up any draft capital to get Foles or any back up QB for that matter. If he gets cut then OK fine I guess (I'm still not convinced) but we should not be trading to get him. It’s a moot point now that we signed Flacco but it was my understanding that it was a cap benefit for Chicago to trade Foles rather than cut him. We might’ve been able to give up a 7th for a 6th in return. I’d take that over Flacco. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UK_EaglesFan89 Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 6 hours ago, Road to Victory said: It’s a moot point now that we signed Flacco but it was my understanding that it was a cap benefit for Chicago to trade Foles rather than cut him. We might’ve been able to give up a 7th for a 6th in return. I’d take that over Flacco. I can see your point but personally I'd prefer Flacco. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now