1 minute ago, NOTW said:

I don't know, we do know what the Catholic church did.  Just saying logically if it might go unreported in one arena, couldn't it be elsewhere also?  I'm not making any claims about it in public schools was just asking about the logic. 

Sexual misconduct is definitely underreported. I have little doubt there. Probably equally underreported in both the Catholic Church and schools. 

https://www.eaglesmessageboard.com/topic/461-female-teachers-caught-having-sex-with-students/#comments

2 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

Sexual misconduct is definitely underreported. I have little doubt there. Probably equally underreported in both the Catholic Church and schools. 

while i agree there's issues across the board, i think it definitely leans more towards to the catholic school side. i don't see where the public school system has made it a mission for decades to squash/cover up reported incidents. when that happens for so long, victims feel there's no use in reporting it and don't.  

7 minutes ago, rambo said:

https://www.eaglesmessageboard.com/topic/461-female-teachers-caught-having-sex-with-students/#comments

i brought this up earlier, there's no doubt these women are pushing the numbers. just wish i was a poor, vulnerable high school senior again. 

3 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

while i agree there's issues across the board, i think it definitely leans more towards to the catholic school side. i don't see where the public school system has made it a mission for decades to squash/cover up reported incidents. when that happens for so long, victims feel there's no use in reporting it and don't.  

I tend to agree. The coverup is what made the Catholic Church sexual abuses the enduring scandal. Completely eroded the trust.

21 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

i brought this up earlier, there's no doubt these women are pushing the numbers. just wish i was a poor, vulnerable high school senior again. 

Buddy of mine in college got hit up by his chick professor. After six weeks of banging she failed him in the class 

7 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

Buddy of mine in college got hit up by his chick professor. After six weeks of banging she failed him in the class 

damn, that's savage. 

8 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

Buddy of mine in college got hit up by his chick professor. After six weeks of banging she failed him in the class 

maybe she wanted another semester of that parent/teacher sexual tension..

19 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

maybe she wanted another semester of that parent/teacher sexual tension..

hot teacher brandi lov .... oh crap, i was typing that on the wrong website. 

2 hours ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

damn, that's savage. 

He never did any more work than the bare minimum that would allow him to reach a 2.0 overall and be able to graduate.  He thought he could get away with just banging her and doing absolutely nothing else in that class and she wasn't having it.

Of course we all blamed it on a horrible sexual performance by him

Consequences…

 

https://wsvn.com/news/local/broward/foreperson-3-jurors-unwilling-to-convict-resiles-based-on-race-leading-to-mistrial/

Quote

FORT LAUDERDALE, FLA. (WSVN) - The foreperson of the jury in the murder trial of Dayonte Resiles said three jurors were unwilling to convict Resiles based on his race.

The foreperson discussed on Friday the most recent twist in the trial that ended Wednesday with the hung jury.

“[The three jurors] said, ‘I don’t want to send a young Black male to jail for the rest of their life or have him get the death sentence,'” said the foreperson.

Resiles faces life in prison and possibly the death penalty for the murder of Jill Su, a 59-year-old Davie woman who was killed in her home back in September of 2014.

Police said Resiles broke into the home to commit a burglary, and when he found Su inside, he tied her up and stabbed her to death. His DNA was found on a knife and inside the home.

Two years after his arrest, Resiles escaped from a Broward County courtroom. He was found six days later.

Just before Thanksgiving, the suspect finally stood trial. After six days of deliberations, the jury came back with manslaughter, but when it came time for the foreperson to confirm the verdict to the judge, she couldn’t do it.

"The whole time I’m staring at the judge and at the clerk, and we’re locking eyes, and I’m looking at each one of them,” said the juror. "They’re just waiting for my verdict of either ‘yes, I agree’ or ‘no,’ and I just couldn’t, and that’s why I said no.”

She said most of the jury was ready to convict Resiles of at least second-degree murder, but the three refused because the defendant is Black.

After they compromised on manslaughter, she said, her courtroom change of heart led to threats from other jurors.

"You guys keep saying ‘a young Black man,’ but I don’t see race. I just see a human being, and you know, one particular person said to me, ‘Hey, if you were outside this courtroom, you would have gotten smacked out in the street for this,'” said the juror.

Resiles will be tried again in January with a new jury. It will feature the same evidence, but with 12 new people to hear the case.

The former foreperson hopes they can do their job.

"The society that we’re in right now, it needs to change, and just not look at color of skin. I feel like we need to look at each other as human beings, as who we are,” she said.

Resiles’ next trial is set to start on Jan. 3.

Dude's DNA was in the home and on the knife, but a jury wouldn't convict solely because of his skin color. Our criminal justice system is broken beyond repair. 

Unprovoked stabbing of a young white woman by a black male. Sadly, this is only going to get worse:

 

So the dude who murdered a white, 19-year-old Burger King employee was screaming about reparations, apparently. I wonder if telling an entire race of people that they're horribly oppressed by whites has any consequences at all?

Quote

'Why am I guilty?' Glynn shouted through the blue mask covering his face as officers walked him to a waiting police car.

'You know they charge n*****s every day? 

'Where’s our reparations for four hundred years of f***ing slavery.'

Detectives attempted to load the handcuffed suspect into the back of the car when he screamed 'f*** you all! and then bellowed, 'America's gonna BURN!'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10403325/Police-arrest-suspected-gunman-cold-blooded-killing-Burger-King-worker-19.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailus

As few as 10 years ago, could anyone have possibly predicted that an entire entertainment genre would spring up around hating white people? It's actually pretty astounding how quickly things are moving.

 

Wordle 235 2/6

⬛🟨🟨⬛🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

1 hour ago, Kz! said:

As few as 10 years ago, could anyone have possibly predicted that an entire entertainment genre would spring up around hating white people? It's actually pretty astounding how quickly things are moving.

 

Combat mild racism with extreme racism. Brilliant. 

1 minute ago, Blazehound said:

Combat mild racism with extreme racism. Brilliant. 

We get hours of news coverage and a complete liberal offensive to cancel Joe Rogan because he said the N word while quoting someone else ten years ago, but Showtime comes up with an entire series promoting anti-white hatred and no one even bats an eye.  

https://www.thedailybeast.com/republicans-actually-love-affirmative-action-for-themselves

Republicans Actually Love Affirmative Action (for Themselves)

The GOP feigns outrage over "fairness,” but "affirmative action for me, none for thee” is their unofficial mantra.

 

Republicans never miss an opportunity to clutch their pearls when a person of color is elevated to a plum position. But if they had a shred of honesty, the GOP would admit their position could more aptly be titled: "Affirmative action for me, none for thee.”

Even though Biden has yet to name his Supreme Court Justice nominee to replace retiring Justice Stephen Breyer, his mere pledge to nominate a Black woman for the first time in this nation’s history has made the right-wing ecosystem apoplectic, predictably leading to all sorts of racist dog whistles being fed to their base. Put simply: they’re fine with special treatment and double standards that elevate white conservatives, but passionately oppose equity and opportunities for people of color. 

Sen. Ted Cruz—who wasn’t offended when he was berated by Tucker Carlson on live TV and who has been a loyal lapdog to former President Trump even after he disparaged Cruz’s wife’s appearance—nonetheless referred to Biden’s vow as "offensive.”

 

Cruz, absurdly, decided to speak on behalf of all Black women and declared Biden’s attempt to honor and elevate Black women (the backbone of the Democratic Party) an "insult to Black women.” This elite, Harvard-educated lawyer tried his hand at math and incorrectly stated that Black women represent 6 percent of the US population (the number is 7 percent), and furthermore concluded that President Biden is telling the rest of us, "I don’t give a damn about you, you are ineligible.”

That line actually hits close to home for people of color—who are not Cruz’s intended audience.

Historically, the United States hasn’t given a "damn” about elevating people of color to positions of power and equity. If conservatives ever paused and read history books (or at least the ones they aren’t trying to ban from schools), they’d actually admit they fully embrace affirmative action, which has overwhelmingly benefited white people.

America’s original affirmative action certainly didn’t help Black people, who were forcibly brought here against their will and built this land with their blood, sweat, and pain only to be rewarded with slavery and dehumanization.

In 1790, citizenship was given only to "free white persons” living in America, who were the only ones who could vote and own property. Affirmative action didn’t help Indigenous people, who were forcibly removed from their ancestral lands thanks to the 1862 Homestead Act. Their land was then given to white settlers, who were able to pull themselves up from their "bootstraps” thanks directly to "handouts” from the US government.

That same government has so been generous with its affirmative action policies towards white people that it even helped white families gain wealth through home ownership. Between 1934 and 1962, almost 98 percent of the $120 billion in federal government-backed home loans went to whites. That left 2 percent for everyone else.

Speaking of 2 percent, that’s the percentage of people of color who have served on the Supreme Court. Since 1789, over 115 justices have been appointed and confirmed, all of them white, except Justices Marshall, Thomas, and Sotomayor. For Cruz, what’s really "offensive” is the notion that people of color, especially women, are "replacing” white men and women on the nation’s highest and most prestigious Court.

Looking at state supreme courts, only 17 percent of justices are Black, Latino, Asian American, or Native American, far below the 40 percent they represent in the U.S. population. Unsurprisingly, there have been no news reports, hashtags, alarm, or outrage on Fox News about this "casual racism of affirmative action,” which has so clearly benefited white judges.

But because we’re talking about Black women, that’s how Tucker Carlson—an amplifier of white nationalist talking points—described President Biden’s recent commitment to diversity and inclusion by confirming a highly qualified Supreme Court Justice, who just happens to be a Black woman.

Since Sen. Cruz has inspired this English major to take out the calculator, let’s continue with math and provide some more illuminating numbers. Three. That’s the number of Supreme Court justices that President Trump—a racist who ran on banning visitors from Muslim-majority countries—was able to appoint in part thanks to the insidious political machinations of then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who once posed in front of a Confederate flag and recently referred to African Americans as separate from Americans—which is a synonym for white. One hundred percent of Trump’s three Supreme Court picks were white people, yet there was not a single peep, lament, or complaint from the right-wing chattering classes.

Overall, Trump’s judicial nominees were 85 percent white and 76 percent men. And yet, Republican Sen. Josh Hawley—a supporter of violent, domestic insurrections—didn’t denounce Trump as being "hard woke” and "race-obsessed, gender-obsessed.” Republican Sen. Roger Wicker didn’t refer to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a white woman, as a "beneficiary” of an affirmative action "quota.” Ilya Shapiro, a Georgetown University of Law administrator, didn’t denigrate Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, chosen by President Ronald Reagan (fulfilling his own campaign promise to nominate a woman), as a "lesser” white woman, but he had no problem assuming that Biden’s pick would be a "lesser Black woman.” ABC News didn’t run a poll asking Americans if Trump should consider "all possible nominees”—even as he never so much as flirted with a person of color as a serious contender for the high court—but that’s the poll they conducted when Biden said he’ll pick a Black woman.

All of this is to say it is shameful, but not surprising, that during Black History Month, the shortest month of the year, Republicans are yet again using projection and racist, anti-Black dog whistles and bullhorns to fuel their destructive culture war as a tactic to win voters. Their attacks on Biden’s Supreme Court nominee, who hasn’t even been named, are paired with their assault on a ridiculously overbroad and inaccurate definition of "critical race theory,” banning books by Black, brown, and LGBTQ+ authors, and suppressing voting rights across the nation. 

Meanwhile, they still shamelessly claim perpetual victimhood, whining endlessly that the mainstream establishment is oppressing them, even as they continue to benefit from those very same institutions. When it comes to universities, affirmative action through legacy admissions has helped white families and generations maintain access to power and the most influential Ivy league schools, A 2018 lawsuit against Harvard revealed that 77 percent of their legacy admissions were white.

Instead of entertaining these hypocritical, right-wing attacks on Biden’s Supreme Court Justice pick, Democrats should turn the tables, flex, and go on offense.

Ask Republican elected officials and right-wing media personalities why they were OK with Trump nominating three white people and not even feigning an effort to diversify the court’s demographics? Are they fine with the historic lack of representation of women and people of color in power? Do they think it’s fair and equitable? Is an ocean of white faces in boardrooms, in Congress, and on the Supreme Court—occasionally peppered with a sole token of color—their vision of America?

The answer, tragically, would be "Yes.”

4 minutes ago, Kz! said:

We get hours of news coverage and a complete liberal offensive to cancel Joe Rogan because he said the N word while quoting someone else ten years ago, but Showtime comes up with an entire series promoting anti-white hatred and no one even bats an eye.  

Par for the course with the woke MSM

5th grade students in North Penn district; white kids made to apologize to the black kids.  

 

 

14 minutes ago, NOTW said:

5th grade students in North Penn district; white kids made to apologize to the black kids.  

 

 

This sounds like the work of Mr. Einstein. 

@Blazehound what about this is funny?

34 minutes ago, NOTW said:

5th grade students in North Penn district; white kids made to apologize to the black kids.  

 

 

Awesome. As though our (CBSD) school board wasn't insane enough already, this kind of stupid ish gives them more ammo.

Yesterday our school board cancelled a 9th grade class trip to Washington DC, suggesting that the kids could go to Dorney Park instead and seek educational opportunities there by learning how rides are engineered. The reason? DC has a vaccination requirement in its restaurants and the Trumptards were "concerned" that a kid may be denied use if a bathroom. (Which is false anyway, the vaccine requirement does not apply to people visiting a restaurant but not sitting down to eat)

I wish I was kidding.

8 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

Awesome. As though our (CBSD) school board wasn't insane enough already, this kind of stupid ish gives them more ammo.

Yesterday our school board cancelled a 9th grade class trip to Washington DC, suggesting that the kids could go to Dorney Park instead and seek educational opportunities there by learning how rides are engineered. The reason? DC has a vaccination requirement in its restaurants and the Trumptards were "concerned" that a kid may be denied use if a bathroom. (Which is false anyway, the vaccine requirement does not apply to people visiting a restaurant but not sitting down to eat)

I wish I was kidding.

You should pull your kids from the last few weeks of school this year to show them who's boss.