Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

 

 

 

 

One remarkable thing about the US Supreme Court is that, despite the ideological differences between the various justices, you would be amazed at the number of unanimous 9-0 decisions by the Court.  There was a WaPo article saying something like 36% between 2000 and 2018.  This is much more prevalent than the percentage 5-4 decisions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2018/06/28/those-5-4-decisions-on-the-supreme-court-9-0-is-far-more-common/

 

1 hour ago, Procus said:

One remarkable thing about the US Supreme Court is that, despite the ideological differences between the various justices, you would be amazed at the number of unanimous 9-0 decisions by the Court.  There was a WaPo article saying something like 36% between 2000 and 2018.  This is much more prevalent than the percentage 5-4 decisions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2018/06/28/those-5-4-decisions-on-the-supreme-court-9-0-is-far-more-common/

I know a guy on the Supreme Court. 

13 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

I know a guy on the Supreme Court. 

Ah, the intelligentsia in CVON surfaces.

2 minutes ago, Procus said:

Ah, the intelligentsia in CVON surfaces.

Somebody had to balance put your idiocy. 

 

Don't worry guys, I got this.

5 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

Somebody had to balance put your idiocy.

Don't worry guys, I got this.

Ah, the legal scholar Boogyman wants to chime in.  Go ahead, give it your best shot.

Just now, Procus said:

Ah, the legal scholar Boogyman wants to chime in.  Go ahead, give it your best shot.

I never said I was a legal scholar. I do know quite a few though. 

What would your profession be? I'm a chemical operator.

3 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

What would your profession be? I'm a chemical operator.

That happens to be a very important job and I am not being sarcastic

Just now, Procus said:

That happens to be a very important job and I am not being sarcastic

I didn't ask what you thought of my occupation, I asked what you did for yours.

26 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

I didn't ask what you thought of my occupation, I asked what you did for yours.

I'm semi retired now.  I used to be an attorney for the Internal Revenue Service.

What's your name?

9 minutes ago, Procus said:

I'm semi retired now.  I used to be an attorney for the Internal Revenue Service.

What's your name?

Boogyman.

52 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

I'm a chemical operator.

🥇

12 minutes ago, Talkingbirds said:

🥇

I only told him my occupation because I asked him his, and in another thread he requested someone's financial records in order to answer a fairly simple question.

1 hour ago, Boogyman said:

I only told him my occupation because I asked him his, and in another thread he requested someone's financial records in order to answer a fairly simple question.

Oh, so you are now willing to post your REAL name and reveal personal information here.  That's very brave of you.  After all, my question to you was very simple.  What's the matter, don't you have any BALLS?

11 minutes ago, Procus said:

Oh, so you are now willing to post your REAL name and reveal personal information here.  That's very brave of you.  After all, my question to you was very simple.  What's the matter, don't you have any BALLS?

So this post is your confirmation that you are, in fact, retarded. Got it.

2 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

So this post is your confirmation that you are, in fact, retarded. Got it.

😂😂😂

  • Author
3 hours ago, Boogyman said:

I know a guy on the Supreme Court. 

I heard he was quite a hound in HS.

1 hour ago, Boogyman said:

I only told him my occupation because I asked him his, and in another thread he requested someone's financial records in order to answer a fairly simple question.

35yrs in research for Fortune 500 chemical company.  Loved every day of it.

6 hours ago, Procus said:

I'm semi retired now.  I used to be an attorney for the Internal Revenue Service.

What's your name?

Wait. We are all letting it slide that this dude was an attorney for the IRS. 

Don’t take this personally but…eff your employer. 

I was debating whether or not Hitler or Stalin was the more horrid person, then I was reminded that the IRS has lawyers. 

 

 

18 hours ago, vikas83 said:

Wait. We are all letting it slide that this dude was an attorney for the IRS. 

Don’t take this personally but…eff your employer. 

We don't want audits 😆

Create an account or sign in to comment