Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, T-1000 said:

So ESPN shows highlights of an offensive tackle instead of a S from Clemson, cool.

Its always teh case on day 3. they are always usually 2 to 4 picks behind to review the pick. They will catch up

Yeah, but, we drafted C.J. Gaddis too.  Not every Clemson S is going to be Dawk.

1 minute ago, CaliEagle said:

I can't see anyone going that far with it.

Be patient. 

2 minutes ago, Southparkeagles said:

Let the Dawkins comparisons begin......

reading his bio, he has some similarities in style. The blitzing, gap penetration, aggressive, hard hitter. 

After that though his weaknesses Dawk all had as strengths. 

I think you could call him a Poor mans Dawk, but I dont think anyone will think he could ever come close.

Regardless of whether there are comparisons or not, it was a good pick. 
 

1 of 4

I like this pick a lot

If he takes Mills’ job, I LOVE this pick a lot 

Good pick.

Not happy with Reagor, but other than that I like this draft thus far.  Wentz is the man, but we can't rely on Suds, and Hurts is a project, that if successful, can be flipped for the 2nd we're using on him in a few years.  He's a proven winner with tons of mobility.

 

Adding depth to LB and S was a must.  Still need to add depth along the o-line, CB, and d-line 

1 minute ago, DeathByEagle said:

reading his bio, he has some similarities in style. The blitzing, gap penetration, aggressive, hard hitter. 

After that though his weaknesses Dawk all had as strengths. 

I think you could call him a Poor mans Dawk, but I dont think anyone will think he could ever come close.

He’s a safety outta Clemson. 
That’s the only comparison I’m going with right now. 

Hopefully he’s not CJ Gaddis 2.0. 
 

10 minutes ago, Southparkeagles said:

Let the Dawkins comparisons begin......

He actually reminds me of Jenkins a little bit.

THEY DIDN'T TAKE THE WATER BOY??? Seeee??? I TOLD you!!! F this draft.

 

 

21 minutes ago, RUEagle said:

Come on.  Projected by who?   Anything after round 2 is all discretionary anyway.  


ughhhhh....you had to bring up the 2nd round....

I just think this is a great pick in the 4th. Guy is clearly hungry, durable and a playmaker. 

Excited to see him come in and compete.

I like it

16 minutes ago, Southparkeagles said:

Let the Dawkins comparisons begin......

I thought he looked more comparable to Jenkins.

Happy with this pick!

Should have taken another QB.

Bites on double moves? I hope he can overcome that. 

Don't know much about him.

29 minutes ago, UK_EaglesFan89 said:

Yeah I like Wallace. I'm sure I've seen him projected all over the place. 

DraftTek has him rated as the #114 overall prospect.  

Better pick than LB Quarterman or CB Robertson?

47 minutes ago, Talonblood said:

THEY DIDN'T TAKE THE WATER BOY??? Seeee??? I TOLD you!!! F this draft.

 

 

ummm. Yeah, they did. Our LB was the HS water boy and his momma wouldn't let him play fooseball. So we did draft Bobby Bouche. 

42 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said:

Bites on double moves? I hope he can overcome that. 

Don't know much about him.

He'll fit right in to the Schwartz philosophy.

I like this pick because he's versatile. He played safety and linebacker in Clemson's scheme. He's very physical and isn't afraid to stick a RB in the backfield. He'll need to improve his cover skills, though. He's not very fluid in pass defense. 

I like the pick. Hope he isn't another Cj Gaddis. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:ph34r:

If he can come in and take the starting spot this season we Can look and the 2nd rnd pick in a different light cant we? 

Create an account or sign in to comment