June 22, 20214 yr Author 7 minutes ago, Road to Victory said: Let’s wait and see what the audits show. There was a lot of funny business going on. I think the mail-in ballots added an element to easily cheat in an election. I knew it! Lolololololololololololololol
June 22, 20214 yr 14 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: So, literally nothing you're mentioning has anything to do with the Ron DeSantis law. So, I assume you agree that his law is big-government socialism and a radical departure from anything resembling conservatism? I think if they are banning stories for which they are protected for under 230, they should either revoke 230, break up big tech into subsidiaries or regulate them. They have too much power and can literally control speech/media in the country without any other views. They have been nothing more than propaganda arm for the Democratic Party. Very similar to what the NSDAPs did in Germany.
June 22, 20214 yr Author 14 minutes ago, Road to Victory said: Let’s wait and see what the audits show. There was a lot of funny business going on. I think the mail-in ballots added an element to easily cheat in an election. Do you think there is a chance Trump gets reinstated sometime this year?
June 22, 20214 yr 13 minutes ago, Road to Victory said: Let’s wait and see what the audits show. There was a lot of funny business going on. I think the mail-in ballots added an element to easily cheat in an election.
June 22, 20214 yr 13 minutes ago, MidMoFo said: Wrong. Its the reason Trump and the other entities were booted from the social media platforms. The social media platforms, privately owned businesses, didn’t want the liability of allowing liars to spoon feed lies and propaganda to people like you. It’s not your political affiliation or their republican affiliation that got them banned, it’s because they’re feeding you lies. And you continue to slurp them down. I don’t care if they banned Trump. Show me where I said that. I specifically mentioned a true story written by the NY Post about Hunter’s laptop. That story was 100% true and they didn’t want it to get out because Joe (the big guy) was taking kickbacks from the Chinese.
June 22, 20214 yr 1 minute ago, Boogyman said: Do you think there is a chance Trump gets reinstated sometime this year? Zero chance. Don’t antagonize me. I have a question for you. How about we play a game of cards. I’m going to deal and I’m not going to let you watch. Sound fair? That was the 2020 election. Now, after I take all your money, prove that I cheated. It would be impossible but it doesn’t mean I didn’t cheat.
June 22, 20214 yr Author 9 minutes ago, Road to Victory said: Zero chance. Don’t antagonize me. I have a question for you. How about we play a game of cards. I’m going to deal and I’m not going to let you watch. Sound fair? That was the 2020 election. Now, after I take all your money, prove that I cheated. It would be impossible but it doesn’t mean I didn’t cheat. If there s no evidence you may have cheated I'd just go home with less money. And that's where we are. Let me ask you, every time you lose at cards you just assume the dealer cheated? Or any other game for that matter?
June 22, 20214 yr 31 minutes ago, Road to Victory said: Let’s wait and see what the audits show. There was a lot of funny business going on. I think the mail-in ballots added an element to easily cheat in an election. found another one!
June 22, 20214 yr 28 minutes ago, Boogyman said: If there s no evidence you may have cheated I'd just go home with less money. And that's where we are. Let me ask you, every time you lose at cards you just assume the dealer cheated? Or any other game for that matter? Of course not but the Democrats wouldn’t let Republicans watch the ballot counting just like I wouldn’t let you watch me deal the cards. In some areas they let them watch but they were 100’ away. That’s very shady. Admit it, if the tables were turned you would feel the same way. In Atlanta, they said a pipe broke and everyone is going home for the night. When Republicans watchers left, they pulled a box of ballots out and started counting again. They have video of this too. Again, very shady. Admit it.
June 22, 20214 yr 42 minutes ago, Road to Victory said: I think if they are banning stories for which they are protected for under 230, they should either revoke 230, break up big tech into subsidiaries or regulate them. They have too much power and can literally control speech/media in the country without any other views. They have been nothing more than propaganda arm for the Democratic Party. Very similar to what the NSDAPs did in Germany. This comment is so stupid it's hard to believe anyone wrote it unironically. The Nootsies controlled the government. Their propaganda was the only propaganda in Germany. They consolidated power and literally murdered their opposition. Nothing about a private social media company choosing what to allow on their platform is similar. In America, you're free to consume any news you wish. You're literally holding a powerful computer in your hand right now with any information you could ever seek written from any viewpoint you can imagine. Use it. And quit pretending you're being oppressed. It's embarrassing. I'm embarrassed for you.
June 22, 20214 yr 3 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: This comment is so stupid it's hard to believe anyone wrote it unironically. The Nootsies controlled the government. Their propaganda was the only propaganda in Germany. They consolidated power and literally murdered their opposition. Nothing about a private social media company choosing what to allow on their platform is similar. In America, you're free to consume any news you wish. You're literally holding a powerful computer in your hand right now with any information you could ever seek written from any viewpoint you can imagine. Use it. And quit pretending you're being oppressed. It's embarrassing. I'm embarrassed for you. Right now we can consume whatever news we want but that doesn’t mean we will in the future. Big tech crushed Parler under the guise that people were planning violence there. I’m sure no more planned violence than on Twitter or FB. Big tech/MSM could easily shut down Fox News or Newsmax. They have to power to buy/control cable companies and decide not to air Fox News anymore. They have the power to shut down videos on YouTube, shut down internet platforms and internet searches. Big tech has way too much power. I can’t believe you, as a liberal, support that.
June 22, 20214 yr Author 24 minutes ago, Road to Victory said: Of course not but the Democrats wouldn’t let Republicans watch the ballot counting just like I wouldn’t let you watch me deal the cards. In some areas they let them watch but they were 100’ away. That’s very shady. Admit it, if the tables were turned you would feel the same way. In Atlanta, they said a pipe broke and everyone is going home for the night. When Republicans watchers left, they pulled a box of ballots out and started counting again. They have video of this too. Again, very shady. Admit it. All these cases got thrown out, a lot by republican judges. You have been bamboozled by a con artist and have not realized it yet.
June 22, 20214 yr Author 31 minutes ago, Road to Victory said: Of course not but the Democrats wouldn’t let Republicans watch the ballot counting just like I wouldn’t let you watch me deal the cards. In some areas they let them watch but they were 100’ away. That’s very shady. Admit it, if the tables were turned you would feel the same way. In Atlanta, they said a pipe broke and everyone is going home for the night. When Republicans watchers left, they pulled a box of ballots out and started counting again. They have video of this too. Again, very shady. Admit it. Oh and that's a negative. If there is no evidence, there is no evidence. The side of the fence doesn't matter. All these useless and idiotic cases were thrown out.
June 22, 20214 yr 4 minutes ago, Boogyman said: All these cases got thrown out, a lot by republican judges. You have been bamboozled by a con artist and have not realized it yet. I know thats’s the argument every liberal makes. The cases were not heard. Why? Because no judge wants to be part of overturning an election, not even the Supreme Court. As a judge, I would’ve thrown it out too. It doesn’t mean the case had no merit but what judge wants that case on his shoulders.
June 22, 20214 yr 1 minute ago, Boogyman said: Oh and that's a negative. If there is no evidence, there is no evidence. The side of the fence doesn't matter. All these useless and idiotic cases were thrown out. But there is evidence of fraud, lots of it. They have evidence that dead people voted. There’s evidence that Republicans weren’t allowed to watch the results, there’s evidence of ballots being dropped off in the middle of the night by vans with out of state license plates. There’s just not enough evidence to say that it would’ve changed the result.
June 22, 20214 yr Author Just now, Road to Victory said: I know thats’s the argument every liberal makes. The cases were not heard. Why? Because no judge wants to be part of overturning an election, not even the Supreme Court. As a judge, I would’ve thrown it out too. It doesn’t mean the case had no merit but what judge wants that case on his shoulders. Because there was no evidence. That's why. Go look at all of them. "This may have happened. I don't have any evidence, but it could have." That's pretty much how all of them went. Courts are supposed to throw that crap out. Trump lost. He lost for a couple of reasons. He won the independent vote in 2016 (I wanna say by 4 percent but I'm going by memory), and lost it by a bigger margin in 2020 than when he won. He also told his voters not to vote by mail during a pandemic. He basically sabotaged himself. That's it. I'm done with this because we had these same idiotic conversations months ago and it's just boring right now.
June 22, 20214 yr Author 2 minutes ago, Road to Victory said: But there is evidence of fraud, lots of it. They have evidence that dead people voted. There’s evidence that Republicans weren’t allowed to watch the results, there’s evidence of ballots being dropped off in the middle of the night by vans with out of state license plates. There’s just not enough evidence to say that it would’ve changed the result. I feel like you heard all these things right after the election, didn't pay attention to virtually all of them being debunked later and still believe them. I feel like I am having a conversation in December of 2020 right now.
June 22, 20214 yr Just now, we_gotta_believe said: Road to Mental Illness Road? Pretty sure the he has arrived, parked and checked into the hotel for all-time.
June 22, 20214 yr 1 minute ago, we_gotta_believe said: Road to Mental Illness Typical liberal. Call people names rather than debate over facts.
June 22, 20214 yr 12 minutes ago, Road to Victory said: Right now we can consume whatever news we want but that doesn’t mean we will in the future. Big tech crushed Parler under the guise that people were planning violence there. I’m sure no more planned violence than on Twitter or FB. Big tech/MSM could easily shut down Fox News or Newsmax. They have to power to buy/control cable companies and decide not to air Fox News anymore. They have the power to shut down videos on YouTube, shut down internet platforms and internet searches. Big tech has way too much power. I can’t believe you, as a liberal, support that. I can come up a bunch of hypotheticals that could theoretically happen in a dystopian future too. But what you're describing isn't happening anywhere but in the delusional minds of cult-members and, obviously, on Tucker Carlson's nightly question asking sessions. In reality, you can actually join Parlor or even MySpace still if you want. They're out there and they're free to use if you don't like the product FB or Twitter are putting out. It's the market working as it should. What you want is the government to step in and choose winners and losers in the free market. I can't believe you, as a conservative , support that.
June 22, 20214 yr Just now, VanHammersly said: I can come up a bunch of hypotheticals that could theoretically happen in a dystopian future too. But what you're describing isn't happening anywhere but in the delusional minds of cult-members and, obviously, on Tucker Carlson's nightly question asking sessions. In reality, you can actually join Parlor or even MySpace still if you want. They're out there and they're free to use if you don't like the product FB or Twitter are putting out. It's the market working as it should. What you want is the government to step in and choose winners and losers in the free market. I can't believe you, as a conservative , support that. SPOILER ALERT: Most Trump supporters aren't conservatives.
June 22, 20214 yr Author 2 minutes ago, Road to Victory said: Typical liberal. Call people names rather than debate over facts. You are using disproven conspiracy theories from months ago as facts. 1 minute ago, vikas83 said: SPOILER ALERT: Most Trump supporters aren't conservatives. Conservative is pretty much the opposite of Trumpative.
June 22, 20214 yr Just now, vikas83 said: SPOILER ALERT: Most Trump supporters aren't conservatives. Oh, I'm aware. I just know we're still in the stage where they pretend like they are and are wrestling with the fact that it's no longer compatible with their worldview. I think if we give it 5 or 10 years, they will have dropped the facade completely.
Create an account or sign in to comment