July 7, 20214 yr 5 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said: You arent qualified to teach It would be very basic for this group. If you catch my drift.
July 7, 20214 yr 14 minutes ago, The_Omega said: If you want to teach accurate history, we should teach that Democrats are inherently racist, and that everything they propose must be viewed through that lens. Call it Critical Party Theory. I do want to teach accurate history, but also there's no such thing since history is all about interpreting facts and evidence and interpretations change over time. Which is where critical race theory comes in and why it's called *checks notes* a theory. Do you know what a theory is Zuker?
July 7, 20214 yr Just now, ToastJenkins said: So what is the null hypothesis for CRT, Moss? Probably something to do with the long history of anti-black racism in this country. The history that you’re either ignorant of or just pretend doesn’t exist. I’m not entirely sure which category you’re in.
July 7, 20214 yr 16 minutes ago, Dave Moss said: Probably something to do with the long history of anti-black racism in this country. The history that you’re either ignorant of or just pretend doesn’t exist. I’m not entirely sure which category you’re in. You dont even understand how theory works evidently Even calling it a theory gives it far more Credit than it deserved. It is not even a thoroughly tested hypothesis
July 7, 20214 yr 5 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said: You dont even understand how theory works evidently Even calling it a theory gives it far more Credit than it deserved. It is not even a thoroughly tested hypothesis I have’t even read Derrick Bell’s work. As I said before, this is just a conservative bogeyman, not a real critique of an academic theory.
July 7, 20214 yr Just now, ToastJenkins said: White supremacy is far more the partisan boogyman. You are projecting again OK
July 8, 20214 yr 2 hours ago, Dave Moss said: Maybe you didn't understand what you were reading. There's a fugitive slave clause written right into the Constitution. Fugitive Slave Clause The Fugitive Slave Clause in the United States Constitution of 1789, also known as either the Slave Clause or the Fugitives From Labor Clause, is Article IV, Section 2, Clause 3, which requires a "person held to service or labor" who flees to another state to be returned to his or her master in the state from which that person escaped. Says the guy who doesn’t know what "well regulated” meant in 1787.
July 8, 20214 yr Just now, Bill said: Says the guy who doesn’t know what "well regulated” meant in 1787. The Bill of Rights were written after the Constitution, not in 1787. Fwiw
July 8, 20214 yr 2 minutes ago, Dave Moss said: The Bill of Rights were written after the Constitution, not in 1787. Fwiw Did it mean something different two years earlier?
July 8, 20214 yr Just now, Bill said: Did it mean something different two years earlier? I wasn’t sure if you knew there were amendments to the Constitution since you don’t even know what’s in the original document.
July 8, 20214 yr 3 hours ago, Dave Moss said: How was it set up? Because since the Constitution legalized slavery it certainly wasn't set up to give black people an advantage. Or is there something I'm missing? Lot's of things, but a brain first and foremost.
July 8, 20214 yr 7 minutes ago, Dave Moss said: I wasn’t sure if you knew there were amendments to the Constitution since you don’t even know what’s in the original document. Luckily you were here to save the day. It’s amazing I can even function when it comes to law. Hell, the last time I was an affiant for the Commonwealth I just passed out in front of the magistrate. I mean I made the public defender from My Cousin Vinnie look like Johnnie Cochran. Real nasty stuff.
July 8, 20214 yr 4 minutes ago, Bill said: Luckily you were here to save the day. It’s amazing I can even function when it comes to law. Hell, the last time I was an affiant for the Commonwealth I just passed out in front of the magistrate. I mean I made the public defender from My Cousin Vinnie look like Johnnie Cochran. Real nasty stuff. The international slave trade is mentioned in the Constitution too with the stipulation that it couldn’t be banned for at least 20 years. See that, you learned some stuff today.
July 8, 20214 yr 32 minutes ago, Dave Moss said: The international slave trade is mentioned in the Constitution too with the stipulation that it couldn’t be banned for at least 20 years. See that, you learned some stuff today. Did CRT teach you all that, or were you able to learn it with the educational system we already have?
July 8, 20214 yr 13 minutes ago, Bill said: Did CRT teach you all that, or were you able to learn it with the educational system we already have? I’d never even heard of CRT until like two months ago. And I have a graduate degree. Lol Part of the reason I think this whole fuss is a joke.
July 8, 20214 yr A lot of people are arguing against straw men, it is a perfect illustration of current political debate.
July 8, 20214 yr 22 minutes ago, NOTW said: A lot of people are arguing against straw men, it is a perfect illustration of current political debate. If you make everything and anything CRT it’s a lot easier to ban it.
July 8, 20214 yr 2 hours ago, Bill said: Says the guy who doesn’t know what "well regulated” meant in 1787. Or what a theory is…
July 8, 20214 yr 56 minutes ago, NOTW said: A lot of people are arguing against straw men, it is a perfect illustration of current political debate. This thread is hard to follow and I have no idea what anyone's argument even is anymore but I have a hunch that when KKKz, TEW, and TJ are all on the same side of a debate about race, I sure as F wouldn't want to be on that side.
July 8, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, ToastJenkins said: Or what a theory is… What’s hilarious is that you guys don’t even know what the theory behind CRT is, you just know you want to ban it because conservative media said it’s bad.
July 8, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, we_gotta_believe said: This thread is hard to follow and I have no idea what anyone's argument even is anymore but I have a hunch that when KKKz, TEW, and TJ are all on the same side of a debate about race, I sure as F wouldn't want to be on that side. They don’t have an argument in part because they don’t even know what it is.
Create an account or sign in to comment