January 26, 20224 yr 1 minute ago, VanHammersly said: I have no idea what ngl stands for, but yeah, for sure, Republicans would never do anything like stealing the diary of a President's daughter and then forging creepy allegations into it. That's not their style. Agreed, and it's doubtful they'd have inappropriate showers with their daughters that left them feeling violated years later.
January 26, 20224 yr Just now, Kz! said: Agreed, and it's doubtful they'd have inappropriate showers with their daughters that left them feeling violated years later. Under oath testimony from a woman alleging rape = dirty politics False showering allegations fabricated by theives = totally above board Got it
January 26, 20224 yr 4 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: Under oath testimony from a woman alleging rape = dirty politics False showering allegations fabricated by theives = totally above board Got it Everyone is entitled to their truth. I just happen to #believewomen
January 26, 20224 yr 2 minutes ago, Kz! said: Everyone is entitled to their truth. I just happen to #believewomen Actually, you're calling her a liar. You #believejamesokeefe
January 26, 20224 yr 1 minute ago, VanHammersly said: Actually, you're calling her a liar. You #believejamesokeefe
January 26, 20224 yr 36 minutes ago, Kz! said: Yeah, honestly there's no way they'd go as low as false rape allegations, but I wish they would ngl. Why do you care if he still got confirmed?
January 26, 20224 yr ngl it is pretty funny that the regime's hatred for white people is so deep that they're going to do the exact same thing that effed up their VP selection. "We don't care if the selection is any good as long as it's a black woman." Literally the exact same qualifications they looked for and wound up selecting the least popular Vice President in the history of the country lmfao.
January 26, 20224 yr 2 minutes ago, Dave Moss said: Why do you care if he still got confirmed? Because Kz doesn't believe in dirty politics.
January 26, 20224 yr 1 minute ago, Dave Moss said: Why do you care if he still got confirmed? Now that you mention it, I can't think of any reason to be disgusted by false rape allegations. lol lmao
January 26, 20224 yr 2 hours ago, vikas83 said: Biden indicated he'd nominate a black woman. Which is ridiculous pandering, but I digress. Michelle Obama FTW. He was just confused and thinking of the singers.
January 26, 20224 yr 2 hours ago, vikas83 said: Biden indicated he'd nominate a black woman. Which is ridiculous pandering, but I digress. Michelle Obama FTW. Yea. Dumb to say that. He should have came out with something like "I’ll nominate the person I feel is most qualified for the position ". Then chose a black woman.
January 26, 20224 yr 30 minutes ago, Jsvand12 said: Yea. Dumb to say that. He should have came out with something like "I’ll nominate the person I feel is most qualified for the position ". Then chose a black woman. As long as he doesn’t put a third sexual predator on the Supreme Court I’m good with whatever.
January 26, 20224 yr And the Reaction. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/fox-news-panel-reacts-to-breyer-retirement-with-immediate-backlash-to-biden-picking-a-black-woman-what-you-re-talking-about-is-discrimination/ar-AATaLYG?ocid=entnewsntp&fbclid=IwAR2YKHV2ujoFpEZ1QHo6G5VpEMCuittnNeWdG1r4BeXryrCWEN8pmJ1CIzg A Fox News panel reacted strongly to news of Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer's plans to retire. The focus quickly settled on President Joe Biden's promise to nominate a Black woman. Host Harris Faulkner said, "What you're talking about is discrimination." Minutes after news broke that Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer planned to retire, Harris Faulkner's show "Outnumbered" on Fox News quickly turned to outrage over President Joe Biden's campaign pledge to appoint a Black woman to the nation's highest court. Jonathan Turley, a Fox News contributor and constitutional-law professor at George Washington University, compared Biden's pledge to college admissions and tried to argue that picking a Black woman would be unconstitutional under any other circumstances. "And the irony is the Supreme Court just accepted two cases on the use of race preferences in college admissions," Turley, who was a pro-Trump impeachment witness, said over the phone. "And so this is obviously going to come up where the president's going to have to decide if he intends to fulfill a pledge that the court would never allow if he was actually admitting someone into a college." Faulkner replied, "Jonathan Turley, what you're talking about is discrimination."
January 27, 20224 yr 2 hours ago, Dave Moss said: Fox News wants an all-white Supreme Court My expectation is that Biden would want the most qualified person, regardless of sex, color or ethnicity. He made a clear declaration that he wasn’t remotely interested in doing that, and he definitely deserves to get flamed for it.
January 27, 20224 yr The smart politics would be for the Republicans to ask tough questions, but let the nomination sail through.
January 27, 20224 yr 2 minutes ago, Blazehound said: My expectation is that Biden would want the most qualified person, regardless of sex, color or ethnicity. He made a clear declaration that he wasn’t remotely interested in doing that, and he definitely deserves to get flamed for it. Yup
January 27, 20224 yr 4 minutes ago, The_Omega said: Yup Even if Biden had every intention of putting a black woman on the court, why make that public? The fact he so brazenly flaunts criteria based on race and sex is disturbing to say the least, and further normalizes this behavior.
January 27, 20224 yr 22 minutes ago, Blazehound said: My expectation is that Biden would want the most qualified person, regardless of sex, color or ethnicity. He made a clear declaration that he wasn’t remotely interested in doing that, and he definitely deserves to get flamed for it. So 40 years ago when Reagan put the 1st woman on the Court, do you think he picked the most qualified person? Because I think you could make the argument that he didn’t.
January 27, 20224 yr 4 hours ago, jsdarkstar said: And the Reaction. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/fox-news-panel-reacts-to-breyer-retirement-with-immediate-backlash-to-biden-picking-a-black-woman-what-you-re-talking-about-is-discrimination/ar-AATaLYG?ocid=entnewsntp&fbclid=IwAR2YKHV2ujoFpEZ1QHo6G5VpEMCuittnNeWdG1r4BeXryrCWEN8pmJ1CIzg A Fox News panel reacted strongly to news of Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer's plans to retire. The focus quickly settled on President Joe Biden's promise to nominate a Black woman. Host Harris Faulkner said, "What you're talking about is discrimination." Minutes after news broke that Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer planned to retire, Harris Faulkner's show "Outnumbered" on Fox News quickly turned to outrage over President Joe Biden's campaign pledge to appoint a Black woman to the nation's highest court. Jonathan Turley, a Fox News contributor and constitutional-law professor at George Washington University, compared Biden's pledge to college admissions and tried to argue that picking a Black woman would be unconstitutional under any other circumstances. "And the irony is the Supreme Court just accepted two cases on the use of race preferences in college admissions," Turley, who was a pro-Trump impeachment witness, said over the phone. "And so this is obviously going to come up where the president's going to have to decide if he intends to fulfill a pledge that the court would never allow if he was actually admitting someone into a college." Faulkner replied, "Jonathan Turley, what you're talking about is discrimination." Yeah they’ll hammer the white grievance thing for awhile, up until they find a quote from her in kindergarten promoting sharing, at which point she’ll be part of a radical Communist agenda.
January 27, 20224 yr 1 minute ago, VanHammersly said: Yeah they’ll hammer the white grievance thing for awhile, up until they find a quote from her in kindergarten promoting sharing, at which point she’ll be part of a radical Communist agenda. Doubt they have to go that far back. 🤣
January 27, 20224 yr 2 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: Sit down woozy🤣 I'm in my recliner watching Led Zeppelin Breaking the Band. All good here.
January 27, 20224 yr 2 hours ago, Dave Moss said: So 40 years ago when Reagan put the 1st woman on the Court, do you think he picked the most qualified person? Because I think you could make the argument that he didn’t. It was a campaign promise made by Reagan to put the first woman on the Supreme Court. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1980/10/15/reagan-pledges-he-would-name-a-woman-to-the-supreme-court/844817dc-27aa-4f5d-8e4f-0ab3a5e76865/
Create an account or sign in to comment