Jump to content

A cautionary tale: Why trading for Russell Wilson could backfire against the Eagles


time2rock
 Share

Recommended Posts

A cautionary tale: Why trading for Russell Wilson could backfire against the Eagles

7a21ecb78c96de6a50dd36be449585f5-192x192By Liam Jenkins
 
Posted on February 28, 2022
953200913586_atl_v_sea.jpg
ATLANTA, GA – SEPTEMBER 13: Russell Wilson (3) of the Seattle Seahawks barks out the signals during the NFL Week 1 game between the Atlanta Falcons and the Seattle Seahawks on September 13, 2020 at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta, Georgia. (Photo by David J. Griffin/Icon Sportswire)
 

For the past few months there has been one name continuously linked with the Philadelphia Eagles. The Apple of Howie Roseman’s eye, Russell Wilson, is an attainable trade target for the first time and the Birds are in a position to make a run at landing him if they so choose. But it’s never quite that simple.

Everyone knows how good Russell Wilson is. The man is the bar that every dual-threat QB will be graded against for the next decade or so, and his ability to remain among the NFL’s elite despite an offense collapsing around him is frankly remarkable. This isn’t an article to justify a trade. You can read eight of those on a weekly basis elsewhere. But the Eagles have been here before…

Let’s roll back the clocks to 1973. The Philadelphia Eagles traded for 32-year-old QB Roman Gabriel. They gave up WR Harold Jackson, FB Tony Baker, two first-rounders, and a third-rounder for1975. It was a hefty price to pay, but a 2-11-1 team in 1972 clearly needed help, and John Reaves just wasn’t the answer at quarterback.

So, the Eagles gave up the farm for an aging three-time pro bowler and a former NFL MVP. How was he so attainable? Tendonitis started to haunt Gabriel, who threw 12 touchdowns and 15 picks in 1972 as his production plummeted. The Rams made a move to bring in a new option at QB, making Gabriel expendable. But if he could get healthy, the Eagles had a very, very capable arm at QB and someone who amassed over 2,400 passing yards in 4 of the last 7 years.

Things started off well. Fans reportedly named Gabriel as "The Messiah” as former first-round pick, Reaves, looked on. Gabriel’s debut season saw him set a new career-high in passing yards with 3,219 and in touchdowns with 23, while he only threw 12 picks.

It helped that Harold Carmichael was given a path to a starting role. He led the NFL in receiving yards that year, while his quarterback earned the Comeback Player of the Year award and led the NFL in most passing metrics. The Eagles improved to 5-8-1 but were still some way off climbing to the top of the NFC East.

Unfortunately, things unraveled fast. Gabriel would spend four more years in Philadelphia, the first of which started off hot with the team going 4-1. However, he was eventually benched for Mike Boryla after a lack of offseason prep was clearly haunting him.

Gabriel briefly regained the starting role, but when Dick Vermeil arrived one year later, it was clear that the new Head Coach had other ideas. Ron Jaworski would be the guy he eventually hung his hat on.

Gabriel went 12-25-1 with the Eagles as a starter. While that first year was explosive and inspired nothing but hope, it quickly became clear that his best days were behind him and that the Eagles would once again be in need of a quarterback soon.

It’s not like the roster was only one player away either. It took Vermeil a lot of work to right the ship and push the Eagles forward, with the team going without a winning record until 1978. Numerous big-time trades were made and eventually, the Eagles took flight and put together not only a series of winning seasons but an NFC Championship in 1980. Ultimately, Gabriel would not be a part of that journey.

Does it make sense to hold fire on a Russell Wilson trade because of a failed lunge at a franchise quarterback in the mid 70’s? No. But does it show that trading for an elite QB in his 30’s after an injury might not be the most beneficial move if the rest of the team isn’t yet in a position to take the next step? Absolutely.

https://phillysportsnetwork.com/2022/02/28/russell-wilson-eagles/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

But does it show that trading for an elite QB in his 30’s after an injury might not be the most beneficial move if the rest of the team isn’t yet in a position to take the next step? Absolutely.

Cliffs Notes version of the above article. 

Spot ... on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, time2rock said:

Cliffs Notes version of the above article. 

Spot ... on.

After reading that article, this is the only cliff note worthwhile...

 

Quote

Does it make sense to hold fire on a Russell Wilson trade because of a failed lunge at a franchise quarterback in the mid 70’s? No.


 

Useless article with a useless example just to play contrarian. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Why? I'll tell you why?

  1. He's over the hill and the hill gets steeper. 
  2.  The Eagles have plenty of needs particularly on the defense. If you don't improve it, improved offense won't help move us forward
  3. We're already on the upswing. We made the playoffs with the current crew and with a good off-season can add 1 or 2 wins to get a higher seed next year.
  4. Wilson hasn't taken Seattle to the Super Bowl in several years and hasn't consistently been in the playoffs recently so why think he can do it for the Eagles? 
  5. Who's he going to throw to? Our receivers certainly aren't better than what he had in Seattle, and we won't be able to draft one or sign one because of Wilson's cost in draft picks and cap space. 

I'll take my chances with Hurts, this year's draft, and the free agents Howie brings in for one more year and if a quarterback proves to be the final piece go get one next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rob331 said:

 

Why? I'll tell you why?

  1. He's over the hill and the hill gets steeper. 
  2.  The Eagles have plenty of needs particularly on the defense. If you don't improve it, improved offense won't help move us forward
  3. We're already on the upswing. We made the playoffs with the current crew and with a good off-season can add 1 or 2 wins to get a higher seed next year.
  4. Wilson hasn't taken Seattle to the Super Bowl in several years and hasn't consistently been in the playoffs recently so why think he can do it for the Eagles? 
  5. Who's he going to throw to? Our receivers certainly aren't better than what he had in Seattle, and we won't be able to draft one or sign one because of Wilson's cost in draft picks and cap space. 

I'll take my chances with Hurts, this year's draft, and the free agents Howie brings in for one more year and if a quarterback proves to be the final piece go get one next year. 

He hasn't taken them back to the Super Bowl since he came off his rookie contract.  It becomes so much harder to build a more complete team with fewer holes once you have to commit a large % of the cap to the QB.  One reason why I think it would be silly to trade for him ... we'd have to sign him to a new deal that would likely pay him $40M/year and would make it super hard to make any other moves in free agency to fill the numerous holes we have (and will also lose the draft picks to do so).  Compare that $40M to Hurts' cap number ($1.6M).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...