Jump to content

Eagles’ best QB options after Wilson trade to Broncos


time2rock
 Share

Recommended Posts

Eagles’ best QB options after Wilson trade to Broncos

 

Cross another veteran quarterback off your Eagles wish list.

Just a few hours after Aaron Rodgers and the Packers agreed to a mega extension to keep the MVP in Green Bay, the Seattle Seahawks have reportedly agreed to a trade to send Russell Wilson to the Denver Broncos.

z1.JPG.32d3a33fc62e522aaa6b06a75f6d4e86.JPG

That will end all that Eagles speculation.

Remember last week when Howie Roseman and Nick Sirianni doubled down on their support for Jalen Hurts as the Eagles’ starter in 2022?

Well, they knew the most likely outcome was always going to be to run it back with Hurts. The Eagles were probably monitoring the Wilson situation but didn’t think it was very realistic that they’d trade for him.

Of course, none of that prevented the speculation around Wilson and the Eagles over the last year. It was clear that Wilson’s time in Seattle was running out and Philadelphia seemed like a logical landing spot.

Not only do the Eagles have three first-round picks in 2022, but they’ve been enamored with Wilson ever since they failed to select him in the 2012 draft. In fact, when the Eagles used the 53rd overall pick on Hurts in 2020, it was that miss of Wilson that molded the decision.

"In 2012, we had a vision,” Roseman said in April of 2020. "We had a vision that we would draft a quarterback who’s been extremely successful, and I don’t want tampering charges on me but I think we can understand who that was, and then come back in the fourth round and draft a quarterback who won a world championship for us and go back-to-back. And I feel like we got a little cute. And I don’t know that there’s a big difference between taking the 53rd pick in the draft and taking a pick in the third round if you feel strongly about a guy.”

Maybe the Seahawks didn’t want to send Wilson to another NFC team or perhaps the Eagles weren’t willing to cough up what it would take to acquire Wilson, which ended up being a significant haul.

So what are the Eagles’ most likely options at QB for 2022 now?

1. Run it back with Jalen Hurts

This was and is still the most likely outcome for the Eagles. Hurts is still just 23 years old and while he has a long way to go to be considered the long-term franchise quarterback, he did show growth in 2021. It was his first full year as an NFL starter and he threw for 3,144 yards with 16 touchdowns and 9 interceptions and also rushed for 784 yards and 10 more scores. Most importantly, he improved his completion percentage from 52% to 61.3% from his rookie year to his second year.

Is Hurts good enough right now? No. Bu the Eagles are hoping he’ll continue to improve.

The Eagles have been consistent in their messaging about Hurts being their starting quarterback in 2022. They said it again at the combine last week.

"There's no doubt about it,” Roseman said less than a week ago. "I think when you talk about all the things we talked about at the end of the season, nothing has changed. I think what really has changed for us is the opportunity to add.

"This is a great time of year for the Philadelphia Eagles, for us, for our staff and being here and really getting everyone involved in the draft process. The start of free agency is up and coming.

"We have to continue to add good players. We have to continue to make sure that we're doing everything we can to maximize our players' ability to be successful and, certainly, that starts at the quarterback position with Jalen.”

It was likely Hurts was going to be the starter in 2022 before this Wilson trade. Go ahead and bump that up a few notches.

2. Trade for DeShaun Watson

The last elite-level quarterback (and if you’re not going after an elite guy, why do it?) who appears to be available this offseason is Watson, who would bring with him plenty of baggage and unanswered questions. Despite the 22 lawsuits alleging sexual misconduct, there’s a reason the Eagles keep getting linked to Watson.

Whenever there’s a great player who might become available for whatever reason — no matter how nefarious — the Eagles do their homework.

There’s no question that Watson was a great player but he missed the entire 2021 season and it’s unclear when there will be any sort of resolution to his off-field problems. It’s also unclear exactly where the Eagles fall on this issue.

Last week, when asked about the possibility of trading for Watson, Roseman had this to say:

"Well, I think it goes to the question that we started this press conference on. We have Jalen Hurts, who's a 23-year-old quarterback, who led his team to the playoffs, and he's going to get better and better and better. He's going to do everything possible to get better, and we have to do our part in that.

"In terms of players on different teams, no matter what position, don't feel comfortable, can't talk about players on other teams.

"What's going on in the league, I think that's part of what we missed here the last couple of years. I think you kind of come here and you kind of start hearing some things about what's going on at each position, and you just try to gather information. I'm not talking about the quarterback position, I'm talking about in general. You try to gather information about what's going on and what opportunities there are to improve our football team.”

3. Draft a rookie and start him

This one seems rather unlikely as well, especially with how this quarterback class is viewed as one of the weaker ones in recent memory. The top few quarterbacks in this class are Kenny Pickett, Malik Willis, Matt Corral, Sam Howell and Desmond Ridder.

There’s a chance all five could end up being first-round picks but there’s not a can’t-miss stud in the bunch, although Willis appears to have the most upside.

But the Eagles would have to really fall in love with one of these guys to use one of their first-round picks (15, 16, 19) on them or to trade up to get one. If they’re not sold on one of those quarterbacks and if they’re not really convinced that player is going to be better long-term than Hurts, they’re better off just running it back for another year.

https://www.nbcsports.com/philadelphia/eagles/russell-wilson-trade-broncos-what-it-means-eagles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, all I can say is, THANK GOD this madness has now come to an end (at least with regard to Rodgers and Wilson ... still leery of Howie doing something stupid with Watson).  And I hope he doesn't swing a deal for Jimmy G out of desperation.  

Now, stick with Hurts for 2022 ... monitor his progress.  If there are still as many questions about him a year from now, then make a move in the 2023 draft for a QB.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Firstly... Thank god we did not get involved because that's a big price to pay. 

Secondly... Another very good QB out of the NFC!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I truly think the Eagles wanted Wilson and the only reason they don't have him now is because he would not waive his no trade clause to come here.  And I think they've known that for a while now, hence all the public backing of Hurts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle's team Twitter account posted this after this trade...thought it was hilarious...

Image

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, EaglesAddict said:

I truly think the Eagles wanted Wilson and the only reason they don't have him now is because he would not waive his no trade clause to come here.  And I think they've known that for a while now, hence all the public backing of Hurts.

It makes complete sense to fully back Hurts regardless of their intentions.  First, as it relates to a trade, should any deal you may have been working on behind the scenes fall through, you want to be sure your QB is still fully engaged and continues to work his tail off to be the best he can be.  Second, as it also relates to a trade, you want to do what you can to maximize what you get in return for Hurts.  And third, as it relates to the draft, you don't want to telegraph any of your intentions to the other teams.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, time2rock said:

It makes complete sense to fully back Hurts regardless of their intentions.  First, as it relates to a trade, should any deal you may have been working on behind the scenes fall through, you want to be sure your QB is still fully engaged and continues to work his tail off to be the best he can be.  Second, as it also relates to a trade, you want to do what you can to maximize what you get in return for Hurts.  And third, as it relates to the draft, you don't want to telegraph any of your intentions to the other teams.  

All true.  But sometimes teams are a little less emphatic if they know they have other plans.  Good gamesmanship by Howie here, lol.  Like last year when he said Wentz was "like a finger on your hand", LMAO.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stick with Hurts and stock up around him on offense and defense. I dont want Watson or any other mediocre vet qb with a name

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Perforator said:

I guess this means Watson is coming to Philly.

watson… jimmy g, jorden love, kurt cousin, nick foles… the factory is still in play hahaha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cheesteakitis said:

watson… jimmy g, jorden love, kurt cousin, nick foles… the factory is still in play hahaha

yikes man, at least get their names right...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Vee said:

yikes man, at least get their names right...

He forgot Casey Wents, Tim Brody, and Cam Newsome.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The answer is simple and cheap.  I'll say it again:  Pry away Foles from the Bears.  A 5th round pick should do it.  Start Hurts for all games through Thanksgiving.  Then start Foles after Thanksgiving and in the playoffs.   Trophy awaits us again with this formula.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, time2rock said:

He forgot Casey Wents, Tim Brody, and Cam Newsome.  

moore good options ;) 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Vee said:

yikes man, at least get their names right...

what would be the fun in that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, time2rock said:

He forgot Casey Wents, Tim Brody, and Cam Newsome.  

Casey wentzzzz to washington not getting that superstar 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cheesteakitis said:

atleast one report that we made an off on Wilson 

AFE4A427-DE1D-41E2-A386-9842F4199DDC.jpeg

I always have to wonder with these reports ... how does someone from the outside become privy to that kind of information (RW turned down offers from Washington and Philly)?  I am always skeptical of these "reports" and feel there is some level of speculation that leads to them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/9/2022 at 7:02 AM, time2rock said:

It makes complete sense to fully back Hurts regardless of their intentions.  First, as it relates to a trade, should any deal you may have been working on behind the scenes fall through, you want to be sure your QB is still fully engaged and continues to work his tail off to be the best he can be.  Second, as it also relates to a trade, you want to do what you can to maximize what you get in return for Hurts.  And third, as it relates to the draft, you don't want to telegraph any of your intentions to the other teams.  

Exactly.  All the Hurts love is Dilbert smoke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weko said:

Exactly.  All the Hurts love is Dilbert smoke

Not necessarily.  I think there is a good chance he is our QB for 2022.  They very well could know that a lot of QBs take more than 1 full year as a starter to show they have the potential to be a long term solution and will give him the year to continue to evaluate the him.  OR they could just understand that there aren’t really any decent options that would be a significant upgrade available at this time (that wouldn’t hamstring us for the foreseeable future).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/8/2022 at 5:12 PM, time2rock said:

First, all I can say is, THANK GOD this madness has now come to an end (at least with regard to Rodgers and Wilson ... still leery of Howie doing something stupid with Watson).  And I hope he doesn't swing a deal for Jimmy G out of desperation.  

Now, stick with Hurts for 2022 ... monitor his progress.  If there are still as many questions about him a year from now, then make a move in the 2023 draft for a QB.  

These people are professional scouts. It was obvious to everyone Hurts does not even have what it takes on a rudimentary level of being a QB. Why not wait 3 years? 4 years? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, matchew88 said:

These people are professional scouts. It was obvious to everyone Hurts does not even have what it takes on a rudimentary level of being a QB. Why not wait 3 years? 4 years? 

I'm not suggesting they wait 3-4 years and also not suggesting they wait BECAUSE they need to give Hurts a longer look.  I am suggesting they wait one year and use Hurts as a bridge QB and grab one in 2023 (assuming the need is still there) because there weren't/aren't any (what I consider) better (realistic) options available to us.  The QB class is weak (I'd rather not hitch ourselves to a QB that may be the next Daniel Jones or Mitch Trubisky or Sam Darnold) and I had no interest in trading what it would have taken to land a vet QB that is in his mid-to-late 30s.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, time2rock said:

I'm not suggesting they wait 3-4 years and also not suggesting they wait BECAUSE they need to give Hurts a longer look.  I am suggesting they wait one year and use Hurts as a bridge QB and grab one in 2023 (assuming the need is still there) because there weren't/aren't any (what I consider) better (realistic) options available to us.  The QB class is weak (I'd rather not hitch ourselves to a QB that may be the next Daniel Jones or Mitch Trubisky or Sam Darnold) and I had no interest in trading what it would have taken to land a vet QB that is in his mid-to-late 30s.  

You have a point. But I'm thinking of a different QB. Gardner was not really given much of a chance and I think did much more in limited time. With more weapons, we could have a Nick Foles - esque shot. We went to the playoffs with a passing running back. Someone who can make use of Quez Watkins being open could've actually allowed us to win vs TB.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, matchew88 said:

You have a point. But I'm thinking of a different QB. Gardner was not really given much of a chance and I think did much more in limited time. With more weapons, we could have a Nick Foles - esque shot. We went to the playoffs with a passing running back. Someone who can make use of Quez Watkins being open could've actually allowed us to win vs TB.

 

I hear you ... I am torn on wanting to see more from Hurts to see if he can improve on his weaknesses and also seeing more from Minshew.  He came from a crap situation in Jacksonville so it's kinda hard to gauge what he can really do based on his time there.  I do hope they go into these offseason camps allowing a legit QB competition (that's the way it should be) ... best man win.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...