4 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

I dunno. In a service industry the workers are the commodity, no? Or at least they are the product.

 

Also, this entire thread has been "women women women". The sex industry also employs male prostitutes, porn stars and strippers, I assume the only difference is they  get paid less.

And everything I stated ALSO applies to them.  

 

 

Although I don't want to get ride of male strippers.  I'm worried what that will do to the elephant novelty g-string industry.

4 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

I dunno. In a service industry the workers are the commodity, no? Or at least they are the product.

 

Also, this entire thread has been "women women women". The sex industry also employs male prostitutes, porn stars and strippers, I assume the only difference is they  get paid less.

You'd be surprised...

Just now, DEagle7 said:

You'd be surprised...

Me thinks someone just hinted to how they paid their way through college

Just now, paco said:

And everything I stated ALSO applies to them.  

Yeah I know. I was just pointing it out. "Me too too."

I guess I just prefer the goverment be involved in pretty much everything as little as necessary. 

1 minute ago, DEagle7 said:

You'd be surprised...

 

1 minute ago, DEagle7 said:

You'd be surprised...

Pretty sure the male porn stars make less, at least compared to their "star" counterparts. 

5 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

Pretty sure the male porn stars make less, at least compared to their "star" counterparts. 

Porn sure, prostitution male or trans folks can make just as much as more depending on location. Demand is higher than you'd think and supply is lower compared to female prostitutes. 

... allegedly 

 

8 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:

Porn sure, prostitution male or trans folks can make just as much as more depending on location. Demand is higher than you'd think and supply is lower compared to female prostitutes. 

... allegedly 

 

Well now you've gone and done it.

8 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:

Porn sure, prostitution male or trans folks can make just as much as more depending on location. Demand is higher than you'd think and supply is lower compared to female prostitutes. 

... allegedly 

 

with almost exclusively male clientele, no doubt. doodes be horny af. 

25 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

I dunno. In a service industry the workers are the commodity, no? Or at least they are the product.

 

Also, this entire thread has been "women women women". The sex industry also employs male prostitutes, porn stars and strippers, I assume the only difference is they  get paid less.

It’s still HEAVILY exploitive of women. Way more so than men. That men will also be exploited isn’t a strong argument in favor of it imo. But drive through any areas where there are strip clubs and tell me that the industry isn’t almost exclusively women. This is the kind of topic that is hard to discuss here because it’s almost exclusively a male perspective on this board. There are plenty of women that will support what some of you are saying but still not having more of a female perspective on this topic makes it hard to get some points across. Women view sex and are treated sexually very different than men. Unless you grow up as a woman and have those experiences many of you just won’t understand it. 

3 minutes ago, mr_hunt said:

with almost exclusively male clientele, no doubt. doodes be horny af. 

Yep. Not exclusively but yeah definitely big majority is men. 

1 minute ago, binkybink77 said:

It’s still HEAVILY exploitive of women. Way more so than men. That men will also be exploited isn’t a strong argument in favor of it imo. But drive through any areas where there are strip clubs and tell me that the industry isn’t almost exclusively women. This is the kind of topic that is hard to discuss here because it’s almost exclusively a male perspective. There are plenty of women that will support what some of you are saying but still not having more of a female perspective on this topic makes it hard to get some points across. Women view sex and are treated sexually very different than men. Unless you grow up as a woman and have those experiences many of you just won’t understand it. 

I still don't see why any of this is an arguement for something to be illegal. Literally every industry is exploited by someone along the way.  If anything, regulating prostitution would make it easier and far more likely for illegal exploitation to be reported and prosecuted.

Just now, Boogyman said:

I still don't see why any of this is an arguement for something to be illegal. Literally every industry is exploited by someone along the way.  If anything, regulating prostitution would make it easier and far more likely for illegal exploitation to be reported and prosecuted.

Legal exploitation is also a problem particularly on a topic like this. I don’t think I’ll be able to convey to you how most women process sex and sexual acts.. it’s quite different than you do as a male. 

Lol haven't really been in cvon this week. Not surprised a thread about sex work already has 8 pages

1 minute ago, binkybink77 said:

Legal exploitation is also a problem particularly on a topic like this. I don’t think I’ll be able to convey to you how most women process sex and sexual acts.. it’s quite different than you do as a male. 

I just don't see the relevance. The women who perform this work are heavily exploited now. Making it illegal obviously doesn't impact that exploitation at all. Maybe legalizing it with regulations can improve on this?

1 minute ago, Mike030270 said:

Lol haven't really been in cvon this week. Not surprised a thread about sex work already has 8 pages

It's obviously a polarizing subject that hasn't been talked about much. Certainly a more interesting conversation than talking about masks and inflation over and over again.

Just now, Boogyman said:

I just don't see the relevance. The women who perform this work are heavily exploited now. Making it illegal obviously doesn't impact that exploitation at all. Maybe legalizing it with regulations can improve on this?

As I said my point earlier is maybe as a society it’s ok if we draw a line in the sand on some of these things. It’s an industry that heavily preys on damaged people. It’s supply comes from people who have already been used and exploited in some way - many times through sexual abuse, neglect and other types of harm that happened before the age of consent. This isn’t mining for resources or some other industry that society relies on. That people want to pay for sex or that some are desperate enough to sell it isn’t a good enough argument in favor of to me. 

6 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

I just don't see the relevance. The women who perform this work are heavily exploited now. Making it illegal obviously doesn't impact that exploitation at all. Maybe legalizing it with regulations can improve on this?

 

Finally someone calling it what it is.  Legalizing exploitation.  

i think some are overestimating the number of women who would 100% willingly take a job where they'd below & farg disgusting weirdos all day long. 

1 minute ago, mr_hunt said:

i think some are overestimating the number of women who would 100% willingly take a job where they'd below & farg disgusting weirdos all day long. 

There is a NEPA or CVON joke in there somewhere.  I'm just not sure which.

1 minute ago, paco said:

Finally someone calling it what it is.  Legalizing exploitation.  

No, legalizing it so the exploitation is more likely to be reported and prosecuted.  It's mostly not even reported now for the same reason a coke dealer wouldn't report stolen product.

2 minutes ago, paco said:

There is a NEPA or CVON joke in there somewhere.  I'm just not sure which.

nepa is filled with richard gere types...so it must be a cvon joke.    

3 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

No, legalizing it so the exploitation is more likely to be reported and prosecuted.  It's mostly not even reported now for the same reason a coke dealer wouldn't report stolen product.

I don’t think you understand that exploitation is happening anyway. Just because a woman agrees to take $100 to put your gross dick in her mouth and pays taxes on it doesn’t mean you aren’t exploiting her - her desperate need for that money for her drug problem or to live. Or her complete lack of self worth because someone raped her when she was 10. 

On 3/15/2022 at 10:31 AM, Seventy_Yard_FG said:

This issue is probably one of the issues that most fits the powers of local government only.  There’s a lot of people that don’t want that in their neighborhood in any form whatsoever, regulated, in a basement, nothing…

The idea that it’s ‘exploitation’ is a myth.  Who is exploited?  The woman?  The man?  Men could be tempted to bankrupt themselves in a brothel. Is that not exploitation?  I say no.  Anyone voluntarily engaging is not being exploited, which is to say nothing about any other argument about prostitution.  

It's likely already in your neighborhood and you just don't know it. Men and women are using sites like onlyfans and others to pretty much sell it. It's also on all social media platforms

There are some that are making millions from onlyfans. Some are even doing it all under the table with snapchat which had people on I think reddit reporting them to the irs

There's a bunch of people making a profit selling pictures and videos

6 minutes ago, mr_hunt said:

nepa is filled with richard gere types...so it must be a cvon joke.    

Note to self:  Open up a gerbil store in NEPA. 

1 minute ago, binkybink77 said:

I don’t think you understand that exploitation is happening anyway. Just because a woman agrees to take $100 to put your gross dick in her mouth and pays taxes on it doesn’t mean you aren’t exploiting her - her desperate need for that money for her drug problem or to live. Or her complete lack of self worth because someone raped her when she was 10. 

Everything you just typed applies to the porn industy and that's legal because there is a camera in the room