What an absolute face-plant by Kz.  Let's check in on my post from earlier in the thread.

On 8/1/2022 at 12:08 AM, VanHammersly said:

Can we at least all agree that anyone defending Republicans efforts to block this bill is a lying POS?

Yep

1 minute ago, VanHammersly said:

What an absolute face-plant by Kz.  Let's check in on my post from earlier in the thread.

Yep

 

3 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Yeah they totally "went back on their word"

*insert Jon Stewart weeping uncontrollably here*

Changing their minds/votes <--------> going back on their word

Sure I guess there's some gray area in there. Fine. When you're out here taking heavy L's in the grill I don't mind giving out the occasional participation trophy.

3 minutes ago, mayanh8 said:

Changing their minds/votes <--------> going back on their word

Sure I guess there's some gray area in there. Fine. When you're out here taking heavy L's in the grill I don't mind giving out the occasional participation trophy.

We drove him to spamming Jon Stewart's face nonstop. Just a total meltdown. 

I'd like to thank all of my fellow CVON libtards for their contributions. It was truly a group effort and I don't believe any of us could have achieved this tremendous victory on our own.

2 minutes ago, mayanh8 said:

We drove him to spamming Jon Stewart's face nonstop. Just a total meltdown. 

I'd like to thank all of my fellow CVON libtards for their contributions. It was truly a group effort and I don't believe any of us could have achieved this tremendous victory on our own.

This place cannot be free. 

Liberals: You don't support the troops if you don't vote for this package.

Republicans: We're close, we just don't want the spending to be discretionary so the funding doesn't go toward wasteful things like transgender military outreach recruiting and a study of how to diversify the R&D team of companies who make predator missiles.

Liberals:

1 minute ago, Kz! said:

Liberals: You don't support the troops if you don't vote for this package.

Republicans: We're close, we just don't want the spending to be discretionary so the funding doesn't go toward wasteful things like transgender military outreach recruiting and a study of how to diversify the R&D team of companies who make predator missiles.

Yes, that's a totally accurate description of events that in no way completely ignores what you admitted to minutes ago.

"We changed our minds. We won't vote for what we voted for previously and now we want our fresh, new demands to be met. I don't know why Democrats don't want to help veterans." 

3 minutes ago, mayanh8 said:

Yes, that's a totally accurate description of events that in no way completely ignores what you admitted to minutes ago.

Why are you so against getting rid of the discretionary spending associated with the bill? 

You don't really have to answer. Jon Stewart and CNN told you to get angry so you are. The end.   

 

3 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Liberals: You don't support the troops if you don't vote for this package.

Republicans: We're close, we just don't want the spending to be discretionary so the funding doesn't go toward wasteful things like transgender military outreach recruiting and a study of how to diversify the R&D team of companies who make predator missiles.

Liberals:

  God, you're a F'ing idiot.  First of all, Toomey said on the floor that they don't want the spending to mandatory, not discretionary.

And second of all, like you just admitted () they already voted for the mandatory spending and then changed their minds, so, no, that's not what they're holding out for.  They're just having a temper tantrum, much like yourself from the looks of things.

Can't even fathom the depths of loneliness I would have to sink to where begging strangers on the internet to mock me for being clinically stupid is preferable to the human interaction I would receive if I was just a normal person.

2 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

  God, you're a F'ing idiot.  First of all, Toomey said on the floor that they don't want the spending to mandatory, not discretionary.

And second of all, like you just admitted () they already voted for the mandatory spending and then changed their minds, so, no, that's not what they're holding out for.  They're just having a temper tantrum, much like yourself from the looks of things.

"oh no, republicans don't want mandatory spending included in this package I wanted dems to be able to use taxpayer money for whatever they want this can't be happening bro I'm so sad"

35 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Meh, they changed their minds after Biden's libtard spending package got pushed through. Feel free to cry about it if you want. Dems can suck it up and cut the libtard free money portion of the bill. 

 

Except for the fact that there was no "free money" added to the bill in the House version.   Sooooo I'll ask one last time, what are the "objectionable parts" that were added to the bill?  I mean, it's a very simple question to answer, right?  I mean, you claim to know that there are "objectionable parts" that were inserted into the bill, and one can only assume that you know what they are.  I mean, otherwise, why would anyone make that sort of claim without knowing the specific parts they are referring to? 

Just now, Kz! said:

"oh no, republicans don't want mandatory spending included in this package I wanted dems to be able to use taxpayer money for whatever they want this can't be happening bro I'm so sad"

But did they want mandatory spending included in the package, which is why they voted FOR the bill when it had mandatory spending included in the package.... Sooooo try again KZAnne!

Oh man this is great.  KZAnne is so clueless on this issue he now thinks that the Republicans are claiming to want the spending to be classified as mandatory, and not discretionary. 

Too....effing....funny.   Why don't you take a break and turn off the internet for a few hours KZ, I think you need to recharge the batteries.

oh no republicans are now asking for a modicum of fiscal sensibility this means they hate the troops and only dems care we are such good people republicans are so evil oh no.

Just now, Kz! said:

oh no republicans are now asking for a modicum of fiscal sensibility this means they hate the troops and only dems care we are such good people republicans are so evil oh no.

Asking for a modicum of fiscal sensibility by....checks notes...voting for the spending to be classified as mandatory in June.  

1 minute ago, VanHammersly said:

Asking for a modicum of fiscal sensibility by....checks notes...voting for the spending to be classified as mandatory in June.  

oh no this is a huge scandal jon stewart told me to be mad then he talked to posobiec and almost cried and now I feel sad what a scandal oh no

Just now, Kz! said:

oh no this is a huge scandal jon stewart told me to be mad then he talked to posobiec and almost cried and now I feel sad what a scandal oh no

And....back to the Jon Stewart well.  

You should've taken the L and dipped out two pages ago, but by all means, keep going.

Kz's life story, in gif form

6 minutes ago, Kz! said:

oh no republicans are now asking for a modicum of fiscal sensibility this means they hate the troops and only dems care we are such good people republicans are so evil oh no.

Oh, so they had forgotten about fiscal sensibility when they voted for the bill in June, but then remembered about fiscal sensibility a month later?  That’s your justification? 

1 hour ago, Kz! said:

 

 

48 minutes ago, Phillyterp85 said:

Oh, so they had forgotten about fiscal sensibility when they voted for the bill in June, but then remembered about fiscal sensibility a month later? 

What's so hard to understand about that? Why does everyone think there's something else going on here?

Imagine claiming to "support the troops" and being "America first" while mocking Jon Stewart who's efforts helped secure funding for first responders to 9/11, and who's now helping to secure funding for healthcare for vetarans.