July 27, 20232 yr 1 hour ago, Boogyman said: Oh. It's getting more difficult to remember what they are all for. That's his game. Move directly on to the next piece of sheet event/scenario/issue. They all blur.
July 27, 20232 yr 2 hours ago, vikas83 said: NY is also the Stormy Daniels case, which is a violation of NY election law. Now I gotta print an addendum. This is exactly my point.
July 27, 20232 yr 22 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: Its totes legal for me to have them under the presidential records act, so naturally i tried to destroy all evidence of having them
July 27, 20232 yr Trump wanted to delete the Server, Hillary Clinton style. There are new witnesses, more video of all of Mara Lago, more text messages and e-mails. Destroying evidence is the ultimate form of Obstruction. They have the document the Criminal Defendant was showing off at Bedminster. He's now charged with that. The evidence is overwhelming, beyond any doubt, and The Criminal Defendant has no defense.
July 28, 20232 yr 2 hours ago, Boogyman said: Now I gotta print an addendum. This is exactly my point. Hope you don't run out of laminate.
July 28, 20232 yr Trump did nothing wrong… …and that’s why he was trying to delete surveillance videos at Mar-a-Lago!!
July 28, 20232 yr Ex-Trump lawyer says evidence against him ‘overwhelming’ in Mar-a-Lago case Ty Cobb, who represented Trump in Mueller investigation, says classified documents case is ‘tight’ after new charges filed https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jul/28/trump-lawyer-charges-1000-years-mar-a-lago Quote On Thursday, he told CNN: "It’s very difficult to imagine how Trump said that his lawyers met with Jack Smith today to explain to him that he hadn’t done anything wrong [Trump’s claim in the election subversion case], on the same day that Jack Smith produces this evidence of overwhelming evidence of additional wrongdoing. "So this is this is, I think, par for the course.” Cobb also said he was sure Trump had been advised by his own lawyers "not to destroy, move [documents] or obstruct this grand jury subpoena in any way. "So this is Trump going not just behind the back of the prosecutors, this is Trump going behind the back of his own lawyers and dealing with two people” – Nauta and De Oliveira – "who are extremely loyal”. Going down like Lewinski.
August 4, 20232 yr The judge warned Trump both not to commit any crimes, and not to tamper with jury or witnesses. Totally normal.
August 4, 20232 yr Trump indicted for three separate crimes this year and the Georgia case will likely be a fourth time. Lmao
August 8, 20232 yr On 8/4/2023 at 6:51 AM, Toastrel said: The judge warned Trump both not to commit any crimes, and not to tamper with jury or witnesses. Totally normal. Jack Smith has already accused Trump lawyers of trying case in the media. Both sides will dispute protective order in court this week, by Friday latest.
August 8, 20232 yr Trump was asked to pick a date from a week long range given - he chose a date some days later. So the judge set the hearing for one of the days the prosecution said it was available, and dewshburry need not attend.
August 9, 20232 yr Jack Smith continues to investigage the Criminal Defendant's Fund Raising. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/08/08/jack-smith-donald-trump-pac-00110279 Fraud is a serious crime. Just ask Steve Bannon.
August 9, 20232 yr Special counsel got a search warrant for Twitter to turn over info on Trump's account, documents say Special counsel Jack Smith's team obtained a search warrant in January for records related to former President Donald Trump's Twitter account, and a judge levied a $350,000 fine on the company for missing the deadline to comply, according to court documents released Wednesday. The details were included in a ruling from the federal appeals court in Washington over a legal battle surrounding the warrant that has played out under seal and behind closed doors for months. The appeals court rejected Twitter's claim that it should not have been held in contempt or sanctioned. X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, sent an automated reply to a request for comment, saying it would respond soon. Prosecutors investigating efforts to overturn the 2020 election results obtained the search warrant on Jan. 17 directing Twitter to produce information on Trump's account after a court "found probable cause to search the account for evidence of criminal offenses,” according to the ruling. The government also obtained a nondisclosure agreement that had prohibited Twitter from disclosing the search warrant, the filing says. The court found that disclosing the warrant could risk that Trump could jeopardize the ongoing investigation by giving him "an opportunity to destroy evidence, change patterns of behavior" or notify his allies, the filing says.
August 11, 20232 yr The Protective Order Hearing is today!!! Will the Judge release the documents or protect them. I was for releasing them and making them public, but was then soon reminded how the Criminal Defendant would weaponize them and attack the witnesses, threatening their security, like the DA in Georgia who is now protected by US Marshalls because of his threats and the Maga cults propensity for political violence.
Create an account or sign in to comment