5 minutes ago, 20dawk4life said:

To be fair she’s not my daughter and I’d f her. 

You’re implying something really weird here. 

Just now, VanHammersly said:

You’re implying something really weird here. 

I haven’t implied anything other than I’d f Ivanka. 

9 minutes ago, 20dawk4life said:

I haven’t implied anything other than I’d f Ivanka. 

I think you implied you’d f your daughter.

weirdo

 

2 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

I think you implied you’d f your daughter.

weirdo

 

You make weird connections. 

it's ok @Dave Moss... you'll always have Walther Ritz... the Kevin Kolb of EM theory

3 minutes ago, Arthur Jackson said:

it's ok @Dave Moss... you'll always have Walther Ritz... the Kevin Kolb of EM theory

I’ll take it!  Kevin Kolb was a great college QB!!

1 minute ago, Dave Moss said:

I’ll take it!  Kevin Kolb was a great college QB!!

yeah we know 

so was greg ward

6 minutes ago, Arthur Jackson said:

yeah we know 

so was greg ward

So was your mom!

oh wait, that’s right.  She played linebacker

1 minute ago, Dave Moss said:

So was your mom!

oh wait, that’s right.  She played linebacker

you mean tight end 

 

 

 

wait 

 

 

 

"The SDNY could have charged Epstein in 2002, 2003, 2004, or at anytime until today. Yet they did not file charges until the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that previously sealed records involving Jeff Epstein would become public record.Thus they are charging him without implicating anyone else who assisted with his operation.”

You know what happened next. Epstein committed suicide.

13 minutes ago, lynched1 said:

"The SDNY could have charged Epstein in 2002, 2003, 2004, or at anytime until today. Yet they did not file charges until the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that previously sealed records involving Jeff Epstein would become public record.Thus they are charging him without implicating anyone else who assisted with his operation.”

You know what happened next. Epstein committed suicide.

5 years late with this, bro

7 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

5 years late with this, bro

Just a refresher. More than a few here have the attention span of table salt.

Just for the sake of discussion, let's say that Clinton and even Trump (to be fair to both sides), are shown to have been involved sexually with minors but for whatever reason, can't be charged with crimes. Further suppose that there's clear and undisputable evidence that everyone believes and that can't be denied. 

Should they lose their secret service protection and pension? 

19 minutes ago, VaBeach_Eagle said:

Just for the sake of discussion, let's say that Clinton and even Trump (to be fair to both sides), are shown to have been involved sexually with minors but for whatever reason, can't be charged with crimes. Further suppose that there's clear and undisputable evidence that everyone believes and that can't be denied. 

Should they lose their secret service protection and pension? 

Trick question.  It doesn’t matter. 
 

They should be launched into the sun

8 hours ago, VaBeach_Eagle said:

Just for the sake of discussion, let's say that Clinton and even Trump (to be fair to both sides), are shown to have been involved sexually with minors but for whatever reason, can't be charged with crimes. Further suppose that there's clear and undisputable evidence that everyone believes and that can't be denied. 

Should they lose their secret service protection and pension? 

Under those circumstances, yes, the protection should be lost, and their pensions divided and given equally to all football GDT thread starters across eastern Pennsylvania. 

9 hours ago, VaBeach_Eagle said:

Just for the sake of discussion, let's say that Clinton and even Trump (to be fair to both sides), are shown to have been involved sexually with minors but for whatever reason, can't be charged with crimes. Further suppose that there's clear and undisputable evidence that everyone believes and that can't be denied. 

Should they lose their secret service protection and pension? 

They don't remove ss protection because of crimes you can't be charged with. Makes your question sort of strange - how can there be indisputable evidence of a crime that no one can deny, and yet fails to be enough evidence to charge a person.

9 hours ago, VaBeach_Eagle said:

Just for the sake of discussion, let's say that Clinton and even Trump (to be fair to both sides), are shown to have been involved sexually with minors but for whatever reason, can't be charged with crimes. Further suppose that there's clear and undisputable evidence that everyone believes and that can't be denied. 

Should they lose their secret service protection and pension? 

There's no such thing as indisputable evidence that everyone believes.  People believe the Earth is flat.

So this was just the first release. Epstein will release an even bigger load. 

12 hours ago, 20dawk4life said:

You make weird connections. 

well either way, it's safe to say that trump agrees with you. 

12 hours ago, Arthur Jackson said:

you mean tight end 

 

 

 

wait 

 

 

 

I heard she was a wide receiver. 😎

1 hour ago, Toastrel said:

They don't remove ss protection because of crimes you can't be charged with. Makes your question sort of strange - how can there be indisputable evidence of a crime that no one can deny, and yet fails to be enough evidence to charge a person.

Statute of limitations, happened outside US jurisdiction, other country doesn’t care to prosecute. 

13 hours ago, Arthur Jackson said:

you mean tight end 

 

 

 

wait 

 

 

 

 

 

Donnie might not be a pedo, but he sure wants to commit incest. I cannot imagine touching my daughter in this way. Gross turd of a 'man', and nothing of a father.

https://www.tmz.com/2024/01/04/jeffrey-epstein-victim-virginia-giuffre-emails-alan-dershowitz-sell-book-bill-clinton-vanity-fair/

Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre was told to paint famed attorney Alan Dershowitz as a pedophile to make a book about her sex abuse claims more appealing to publishers ... according to newly unsealed court documents.

The docs, obtained by TMZ, include email correspondence between Giuffre and U.K. journalist Sharon Churcher from May 2011 ... Giuffre is telling Churcher she found a ghostwriter to pen her story, and says, "I wanted to put the names of these a**holes, oops I meant to say, pedo's, that J.E. sent me to."