July 24, 20205 yr 3 minutes ago, The Norseman said: you'll have to excuse me while i restock my armageddon pantry and buy more ammo Don’t forget TP.
July 24, 20205 yr 4 hours ago, DEagle7 said: EagleVA: Turkey Hill Post of the Century. The EMB has peaked. Everybody pack it in.
July 24, 20205 yr 4 hours ago, DrPhilly said: Post of the decade. This post requires us to consider closing the boards down and declaring the peak reached. Maybe all time.
July 24, 20205 yr 4 hours ago, DEagle7 said: So you're telling me he doesn't believe in like the one fun conspiracy theory out there? This Fing guy... Aliens are something way to many people actually do believe in. He would never pick a conspiracy theory that alot of people actually believe in. Then he wouldn't be smarter then everyone else so he picks the ones with the least possible chance ever of being true. So he can say he is smacking us silly with his incredible insight. He does it with everything on this whole damn board.
July 25, 20205 yr 4 hours ago, NOTW said: One thing we know for sure. Forget science. All you need is Yeah, Interstellar could have done without that.
July 25, 20205 yr 2 hours ago, paco said: Yeah, Interstellar could have done without Anne Hathaway. FYP. She was by far the worst part of that movie. I just watched it again the other night - best part was clearly the score - am I right @dawkins4prez?
July 25, 20205 yr 5 hours ago, The_Omega said: I, for one, would like to welcome our new alien overlords. If I get an invite you can be my +1. Da hell with my wife.
July 25, 20205 yr My first two questions: "Who really killed Kennedy?" "Who really killed Epstein and why did the Clintons do it?"
July 25, 20205 yr So....we rescheduling the storming of Area 51 again? 1 hour ago, Eaglesfandan said: My first two questions: "Who really killed Kennedy?" "Who really killed Epstein and why did the Clintons do it?" Way to waste your first two wishes! You only get 3 you know and the other one can’t be for more wishes. 😂
July 25, 20205 yr Just now, matchew88 said: That link has articles About Trump nostradamus predictions lol I never said Eagle VA's sites were totally legit.
July 25, 20205 yr 1 hour ago, Eaglesfandan said: Alien cube ship bigger than Earth..... - So now the Borg are real...gotta love 2020.
July 27, 20205 yr Just caught up on this thread.... On 7/25/2020 at 12:04 PM, M.C. said: that's weird, because I just posted this: 56 minutes ago, paco said: Can I ask a really, really dumb question? Octopus are supposedly extremely intelligent. On various nature programs and articles I've seen/read makes it seem like they think vs just react on instinct. (them using tools, them adapting to being around people, etc). When you are down there and just seeing them, do they ever strike you as such or do they act like an average fish? I was just curious because I didn't know if its just snippets of extraordinary acts or if they behave differently, like you see every day with dolphins. I'm honestly intrigued how an octopus can be so damn intelligent. Very few species with a similar brain mass show this high an IQ. Maybe a Magpie? Edit: FTR, I don't buy that article https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14668 https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/octopus-genome-reveals-secrets-to-complex-intelligence/ https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/08/octopus-genome-surprises-and-teases
July 28, 20205 yr UPDATE, NEW NY TIMES ARTICLE....clarifying that this information is not based on "beliefs" but on facts and that the technology they recovered isn't from "China", "Russia" or anywhere else on the planet.... Do We Believe in U.F.O.s? That’s the Wrong Question Reporting on the Pentagon program that’s investigating unidentified flying objects is not about belief. It’s about a vigilant search for facts. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/28/insider/UFO-reporting.html By Ralph Blumenthal and Leslie Kean July 28, 2020, 5:00 a.m. ET Times Insider explains who we are and what we do, and delivers behind-the-scenes insights into how our journalism comes together. We were part of The New York Times’s team (with the Washington correspondent Helene Cooper) that broke the story of the Pentagon’s long-secret unit investigating unidentified flying objects, the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, in December 2017. Since then, we have reported on Navy pilots’ close encounters with U.F.O.s, and last week, on the current revamped program, the Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force and its official briefings — ongoing for more than a decade — for intelligence officials, aerospace executives and Congressional staff on reported U.F.O. crashes and retrieved materials. We’re often asked by well-meaning associates and readers, "Do you believe in U.F.O.s?” The question sets us aback as being inappropriately personal. Times reporters are particularly averse to revealing opinions that could imply possible reporting bias. But in this case we have no problem responding, "No, we don’t believe in U.F.O.s.” As we see it, their existence, or nonexistence, is not a matter of belief. We admire what the great anthropologist Margaret Mead said when asked long ago whether she believed in U.F.O.s. She called it "a silly question,” writing in Redbook in 1974: "Belief has to do with matters of faith; it has nothing to do with the kind of knowledge that is based on scientific inquiry. … Do people believe in the sun or the moon, or the changing seasons, or the chairs they’re sitting on? When we want to understand something strange, something previously unknown to anyone, we have to begin with an entirely different set of questions. What is it? How does it work?” That’s what the Pentagon U.F.O. program has been focusing on, making it eminently newsworthy. And to be clear: U.F.O.s don’t mean aliens. Unidentified means we don’t know what they are, only that they demonstrate capabilities that do not appear to be possible through currently available technology. In our reporting, we’ve focused on how the Department of Defense, the Office of Naval Intelligence and members of two Senate committees are engaged with this topic. Current officials are now concerned about the potential threat represented by the very real, advanced technological objects: how close they can come to our fighter jets, sometimes causing a near miss, and the risk that our adversaries may acquire the technology demonstrated by the objects before we do. So if U.F.O.s are no longer a matter of belief, what are they and how do they do what they do? And if technology has been retrieved from downed objects, what better way to try to understand how they work? Our previous stories were relatively easy to document with Department of Defense videos of U.F.O.s and pilot eyewitness accounts backed up by Navy hazard reports of close encounters with small speeding objects. But our latest article provided a more daunting set of challenges, since we dealt with the possible existence of retrieved materials from U.F.O.s. Going from data on a distant object in the sky to the possession of a retrieved one on the ground makes a leap that many find hard to accept and that clearly demands extraordinary evidence. Numerous associates of the Pentagon program, with high security clearances and decades of involvement with official U.F.O. investigations, told us they were convinced such crashes have occurred, based on their access to classified information. But the retrieved materials themselves, and any data about them, are completely off-limits to anyone without clearances and a need to know. We were provided a series of unclassified slides showing that the program took this seriously enough to include it in numerous briefings. One slide says one of the program’s tasks was to "arrange for access to data/reports/materials from crash retrievals of A.A.V.’s,” or advanced aerospace vehicles. Our sources told us that "A.A.V.” does not refer to vehicles made in any country — not Russian or Chinese — but is used to mean technology in the realm of the truly unexplained. They also assure us that their briefings are based on facts, not belief.
July 28, 20205 yr On 7/24/2020 at 2:18 PM, paco said: I'm pretty sure this is how we got thermoses that keep hot drinks hot and cold drinks cold those damn things dont work. i put chicken noodle soup in one and a Popsicle for dessert and instead of having hot soup and a cold Popsicle, i had luke warm strawberry chicken noodle soup
July 29, 20205 yr On 7/24/2020 at 3:28 PM, NOTW said: Selfish a-holes. Or...! 2020 is necessary to bring about the best year ever in 2021! Or at least it will seem like the best
Create an account or sign in to comment