6 hours ago, HazletonEagle said:

We are at the part of Trump's presidency where the lefty extremists complain about Trump eliminating terrorists/terrorist regimes. You gotta love it.

We are at the part of Trumps presidency where his cult members, once again, forgive him for breaking another campaign promise.

You clowns cried continuously about helping Ukraine defend themselves from Putin’s terrorist regime, but all of the sudden think it’s ok to put American troops in harms way.

7 hours ago, HazletonEagle said:

Trump won a big part of his base because he doesnt F around. Hes not afraid to stand up to the bullies of the world. While Obama sent big money to terrorists, and Biden didnt know what the hell was happening and armed the Taliban, Trump gets stuff done.

When he says negotiate, or else, he means the "or else" part.

Trump's base was tired of America being stepped on. Seen as weak.

You guys call him Taco. Now youre big mad because he did something.

He had the pissing match with North Korea which was successfully de-escalated through diplomacy. You guys were big mad. He took out Iranian leaders last time he was in office. You guys were big mad. Now hes bombing their nuclear sites. You guys are big mad again. Always being wrong.

I believe Trumps base hates the senseless wars that Democrats allow to happen. Trump kills bad guys. Goes in gets it done, gets out. Theres a difference. Its not called moving goalposts. Its called you guys always needing to be willfully ignorant to try to save face. Because with any common sense, your arguments are DOA damn near 100% of the time. And that is why people hate the left. That is why as unlikeable as Trump is, he didnt push enough republicans away for you guys to win the election. Because you just suck too damn bad.

Hey quick question: when a top 3 enemy out our country invaded an allied country for no reason other than "it feels like it's ours", did you have the same bravado for standing up to bullies or did you **** and whine like a quivering poosay about shipping outdated military tech and providing intelligence to our allies because it's not our fight? Asking for a friend.

The next month or so will be very interesting. Very hard to predict what will happen next. There is a chance that not much happens and things slow down. However, that will probably be a tough path to take for the current Iranian regime who will be under great pressure internally. Should the Iranian regime take action to protect their internal political standing they will risk Trump retaliating and things could spiral. A bit of a tight rope situation in trying to navigate forward. MAGA will no doubt fall in line now but they will not want to see American boots on the ground and they won’t want to see American interests attacked abroad. Trump has a shot at coming out looking good but the risks are very high.

Whatever happens republicans own this. democratic leadership wasn’t informed until after. Another redeeming quality of your dear leader. Sowing more authoritarian and divisiness with much higher stakes now.

@Mlodj

Looks like strategic use of ADSB has its advantages.

1 hour ago, Tnt4philly said:

We are at the part of Trumps presidency where his cult members, once again, forgive him for breaking another campaign promise.

You clowns cried continuously about helping Ukraine defend themselves from Putin’s terrorist regime, but all of the sudden think it’s ok to put American troops in harms way.

I want us to help finish the job in Russia too. Common sense.

33 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:

Hey quick question: when a top 3 enemy out our country invaded an allied country for no reason other than "it feels like it's ours", did you have the same bravado for standing up to bullies or did you **** and whine like a quivering poosay about shipping outdated military tech and providing intelligence to our allies because it's not our fight? Asking for a friend.

You can check all of my posts from the beginning of the Ukraine thread. I'm and I've said many times we should be helping Ukraine. I support Ukraine. Not wanting to is idiotic.

40 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

I want us to help finish the job in Russia too. Common sense.

Fair enough.

59 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

You can check all of my posts from the beginning of the Ukraine thread. I'm and I've said many times we should be helping Ukraine. I support Ukraine. Not wanting to is idiotic.

While I don’t agree and see your positive view of Trump and his entire mafia organization, I do want to commend you on your view about the war in Ukraine. At least one person from the cult that has some common sense on this issue.

LINK

Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff lays out timeline for "Operation Midnight Hammer"

From CNN's Betsy Klein and Haley Britzky

US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine offered a timeline of the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, an effort codenamed "Operation Midnight Hammer.”

Midnight ET: The operation began overnight Friday into Saturday morning, Caine said at a Pentagon news conference. As B-2 bombers launched from the US, some headed west as a decoy while the rest "proceeded quietly to the east with minimal communications throughout the 18-hour flight.”

Around 5 p.m. ET: Caine said a US submarine "launched more than two dozen Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles against key surface infrastructure targets” at the Isfahan nuclear site in Iran.

As the B-2s entered Iranian airspace, the US "employed several deception tactics, including decoys, as the fourth- and fifth-generation aircraft pushed out in front of the strike package at high altitude and high speed, sweeping in front of the package for enemy fighters and surface-to-air missile threats,” Caine said.

He added that upon approach of the Natanz and Fordow facilities, the US employed "high-speed suppression weapons” with fighter aircraft to "ensure safe passage” of the B-2 bombers.

Around 6:40 p.m. ET: The lead B-2 bomber launched two massive "bunker-buster” bombs at Fordow nuclear site, Caine said, and the "remaining bombers then hit their targets.”

Those additional targets were struck, Caine said, "between 6:40 p.m. ET and 7:05 p.m. ET.”

That places the timing of these attacks around 2:10 a.m. local time in Iran on Sunday.

In total, Caine said, 16 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators were dropped.

Flight back to US: The US military then "began its return home,” Caine said, noting that no shots were fired by Iran at the US on the way in or out.

1 hour ago, DrPhilly said:

The next month or so will be very interesting. Very hard to predict what will happen next. There is a chance that not much happens and things slow down. However, that will probably be a tough path to take for the current Iranian regime who will be under great pressure internally. Should the Iranian regime take action to protect their internal political standing they will risk Trump retaliating and things could spiral. A bit of a tight rope situation in trying to navigate forward. MAGA will no doubt fall in line now but they will not want to see American boots on the ground and they won’t want to see American interests attacked abroad. Trump has a shot at coming out looking good but the risks are very high.

It certainly will be very interesting to see how Iran responds, or if they can even respond with harsh military retaliation. I would think that the regime really has nothing to lose at this point and needs to retaliate, if possible, with attacks against us in the region. If they don’t, they will lose their support internally and externally, as it will show how weak they have become. They’re in a no win situation really, but giving in might alienate their "fighters” more than fighting to the possible end.

1 hour ago, HazletonEagle said:

You can check all of my posts from the beginning of the Ukraine thread. I'm and I've said many times we should be helping Ukraine. I support Ukraine. Not wanting to is idiotic.

Even if that's true, it still significantly detracts from your "I voted for him because Trump stands up to bullies" point no? One of his biggest campaign promises was to withdraw from Ukraine. So what you voted for him because even though he gargled Putin's balls, in the future you thought he'd be more likely to stand up against other corrupt regimes? Not buying it sorry.

1 hour ago, DiPros said:

Whatever happens republicans own this. democratic leadership wasn’t informed until after. Another redeeming quality of your dear leader. Sowing more authoritarian and divisiness with much higher stakes now.

The biggest domestic threat we face right now is Bidens open border policy. Their response is very likely already here.

9 hours ago, Bill said:

2 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:

Even if that's true, it still significantly detracts from your "I voted for him because Trump stands up to bullies" point no? One of his biggest campaign promises was to withdraw from Ukraine. So what you voted for him because even though he gargled Putin's balls, in the future you thought he'd be more likely to stand up against other corrupt regimes? Not buying it sorry.

Russia doesn't pose a threat to the US.

Iran and nuclear weapons do.

1 minute ago, lynched1 said:

Russia doesn't pose a threat to the US.

Iran and nuclear weapons do.

Man this is the wrongest post I've seen in CVON in a long time Sloth my boy. Well done. Here's a Baby Ruth.

1 minute ago, DEagle7 said:

Man this is the wrongest post I've seen in CVON in a long time Sloth my boy. Well done. Here's a Baby Ruth.

Remind us all again at what point I'd consider you had a valid opinion?

4 minutes ago, lynched1 said:

Russia doesn't pose a threat to the US.

Iran and nuclear weapons do.

The country that already has nukes and is actively invading other countries is not a threat, but the country that isn't close to developing one is a threat. Awfully early in the morning to already be this drunk, wouldn't ya say?

CNN

Sources: Top dems on intel committees not briefed before strikes.

Any possible connections to the intel not being leaked before the mission?

Things that make you go "hmmmm".

3 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

The country that already has nukes and is actively invading other countries is not a threat, but the country that isn't close to developing one is a threat. Awfully early in the morning to already be this drunk, wouldn't ya say?

Leaning into the wake and bake this morning?

You're soooooo close to getting it