NOTW Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 I hate this argument for a couple reasons. First, you can think an action is wrong that doesn't mean you have to be responsible for it. The parents who choose (their bodies, their choice) to have sex without protection are responsible. Not anyone else. You can be against animal abuse or murder but that doesn't mean you have to have a dog. You can be against drunk driving but doesn't mean you have to give free rides to drunks. Against looting doesn't mean you have to give them your stuff instead. Against robbing banks, doesn't mean you have to give the robber your money to pay their bills. People are responsible for their own actions and choices. Second, there ARE a lot of people who foster and adopt. I worked for a non-profit foster and adoption agency. I have many friends and family who adopt and are foster parents. There are waiting lists for babies to the point that many adopt from other countries. I do agree on older kids it's sad that more don't foster or adopt them but even so there are charities and programs for them as well. Look at charities and volunteers that serve children's needs from medical care, shelters for families, foster and adoption, counseling, education, etc. "Don't give a ish about them?" That's a lazy ignorant narrative and a distraction from irresponsible people getting pregnant and wanting to get rid of the baby. That's on THEM. Where I can agree are things like cutting programs or "not caring about kids in cages at the border" type situations. But to make blanket statements that pro-life people don't care about kids is incredibly ignorant and lazy. 8 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now