August 11, 20214 yr Shell and Exxon’s secret 1980s climate change warnings Newly found documents from the 1980s show that fossil fuel companies privately predicted the global damage that would be caused by their products. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/sep/19/shell-and-exxons-secret-1980s-climate-change-warnings Exxon and Shell are in on the Globe Warning Hoax just like the Dr.'s and mask industry are in on the COVID Hoax today. WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!!
August 11, 20214 yr 21 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said: Short cluless engineer over compensates…yawn We know for sure that degree wasn't in English. But yea tell us more about your degree in studying insects during a discussion about climate science. That's definitely not over-compensating.
August 11, 20214 yr Funny to see you picking up the torch for hunt’s insect stupidity. But sadly predictable for your desperation to be relevant in the discussion.
August 11, 20214 yr 6 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said: Funny to see you picking up the torch for hunt’s insect stupidity. But sadly predictable for your desperation to be relevant in the discussion. So, like, when a grasshopper breaks its leg, do you splint it or amputate? I'm just curious.
August 11, 20214 yr Eat it of course your realize my phd has nothing to do with insects right? I never understood that bug thing from hunt but eventually realized it was him being a moron/illiterate and thinking i studied entomology. Lmao… breaking news. I did not, dummies.
August 11, 20214 yr So amputate, then? That's too bad. 2 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said: Eat it of course your realize my phd has nothing to do with insects right? I never understood that bug thing from hunt but eventually realized it was him being a moron/illiterate and thinking i studied entomology. Lmao… breaking news. I did not, dummies. Also, lol
August 11, 20214 yr 16 hours ago, ToastJenkins said: I meant the human induced theory obviously humans are absolutely contributing to it. to what amount is the only thing in question. personally, i still think this is a dumb debate by all, just work on limiting if not completely eliminating when possible the levels of pollution we pour into the water and air. our carbon footprint would take care of itself. of course we all know d.c. wont make it that simple because then they couldn't find a way to keep at us at each other's necks while profiting from both creating the pollution and the clean up.
August 11, 20214 yr It seems simple to me. We know carbon increases temps. And we know humans generate a LOT of carbon emissions. You don't need a PHD to put 2 and 2 together.
August 11, 20214 yr Just now, Boogyman said: It seems simple to me. We know carbon increases temps. And we know humans generate a LOT of carbon emissions. You don't need a PHD to put 2 and 2 together. what we generate compared to natural events is always going to bring this simple thought process to a shouting match. again, its silly to me. clear water, clear air. that's it. that's all we need to focus on. /debate
August 11, 20214 yr 3 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said: what we generate compared to natural events is always going to bring this simple thought process to a shouting match. again, its silly to me. clear water, clear air. that's it. that's all we need to focus on. /debate That's true. Thwse natural events have always happened and always will. Humans (in comparison with the age of the Earth) have only just started to add to that. It's a matter of how much "extra" it takes to reach a ripping point.
August 11, 20214 yr 8 minutes ago, Boogyman said: That's true. Thwse natural events have always happened and always will. Humans (in comparison with the age of the Earth) have only just started to add to that. It's a matter of how much "extra" it takes to reach a ripping point. so focusing on clear water and clear air should do the trick. instead of having useless debates about big suv's vs hybrids.
August 11, 20214 yr 6 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said: so focusing on clear water and clear air should do the trick. instead of having useless debates about big suv's vs hybrids. Maybe. I am definitely pro clean water and clean air.
August 11, 20214 yr https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Full_Report.pdf The IPCC report is not a Joke. It is the consensus of a majority of the world's scientists. It's also the consensus of the Scientists who actually do the field work in testing the Climate. Fact is, Carbon is one chemical in the Atmosphere that traps heat. That has been discovered in 1859 by John Tyndall. Obviously, the more Carbon that is released in the atmosphere will have an impact on global surface temperature. The carbon levels have been measured and found to be increasing. Surface temperature has been measured and found to be increasing. Not to mention that current findings can be compared to temperature from 1,000 years ago. Ice Cores show a nice history of that. The Real Joke is those Scientists who have no evidence that the IPCC report is wrong and have not done the actual research themselves to dispute any scientists particular findings or are the able to contradict the report based on scientific research.
August 11, 20214 yr On 8/8/2021 at 4:34 PM, ToastJenkins said: False Global warming can be a nebulous term and people get hung up on exactly what the meaning is when used in conversation... so just so I'm sure I am understanding you... are you saying it's false that there's data showing global temperatures warming and/or false that there is data showing there are novel changes occurring in global climate systems that will have irreversible impacts on the planet and its ability to sustain life as we know it?
February 21, 20223 yr 10 minutes ago, Kz! said: Not only are they horrible communists, they're also pedophiles. https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-wef-tweet/fact-check-the-world-economic-forum-did-not-tweet-in-support-of-lowering-the-age-of-consent-to-13-idUSL2N2OB1HM
February 21, 20223 yr 6 minutes ago, mayanh8 said: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-wef-tweet/fact-check-the-world-economic-forum-did-not-tweet-in-support-of-lowering-the-age-of-consent-to-13-idUSL2N2OB1HM I'm not sure what's more pathetic, making up things like this or falling for them.
February 21, 20223 yr 6 minutes ago, Paul852 said: I'm not sure what's more pathetic, making up things like this or falling for them. Definitely falling for it.
February 21, 20223 yr I guess this belongs here as well as anywhere else. This comes as no surprise to anyone who’s honest about governments.
Create an account or sign in to comment