February 9, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, GreenReaper said: Biden broke the law with the documents No he didn't Quote We conclude that no criminal charges are warranted in this matter.
February 9, 20241 yr 32 minutes ago, Gannan said: Right now there are 4-5 Candidates running. All of them except for Biden are repeating Putin's talking points. That should tell you something. Dean Phillips isn't a Putin stooge. The rest are though (aside from Biden of course).
February 9, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, GreenReaper said: Does it? Does Biden's horrible withdrawal from Afghanistan disqualify him from being a legitimate candidate for POTUS? Does his lack of action on the border crisis disqualify him? Biden now is the one with the most power and he does not intervene on the border, in fact he makes it easier for illegals to enter. Does that fact that trump let 5000 Taliban prisoners go free disqualify him from being POTUS? Does the fact that trump blocked the Afghan Government from his negotiations with the Taliban disqualify him from being POTUS? Do you know that we have a "separation of powers” in the US and that the POTUS does not pass laws?
February 9, 20241 yr 3 hours ago, GreenReaper said: That's rich, Biden broke the law with the documents yet you don't care because your side won. He clearly was involved in business with his son but that is also defended. I don't see you calling for him to be arrested, impeached, etc. He took the classified documents back in 2017 when he shouldn't even have had them. So, you either care about the law or you only care about the law when it comes to prosecuting the guys you don't like. Why can't they both be prosecuted and treated equally. Oh, because one is an old drooling fool he gets a pass? Trump absolutely should have done something on January 6th but he didn't. He also said to peacefully and patriotically protest. Breaking into the capital is not what I consider peaceful. Trump should have conceded and thanked the crowd for their support and told them to go home. We'll see how the courts feel about his actions in the upcoming year(s) depending on what he gets charged with. Should he be removed from the ballot before being convicted? Should states have a say on who is or isn't on the ballot? Biden did NOT break the law with documents. This is the difference between the Trump case and the Biden case: Trump knowingly took the documents, and even after he was caught the government spent 18 months trying to get them back and he refused. Only then did the government resort to indicting him. Hur literally points this out in page 185 of his document: "to prove a violation of Section 793(e) we would need to show that Mr. Biden knowingly retained national defense information and failed to deliver it to an appropriate government official, and that he knew this conduct was unlawful" Trump acknowledged he willingly and knowingly took them, claimed they were his, and refused to return them. Trump broke the law. Biden did not, no matter how much you try to twist it. There is no equivalence.
February 9, 20241 yr 10 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: Biden did NOT break the law with documents. This is the difference between the Trump case and the Biden case: Trump knowingly took the documents, and even after he was caught the government spent 18 months trying to get them back and he refused. Only then did the government resort to indicting him. Hur literally points this out in page 185 of his document: "to prove a violation of Section 793(e) we would need to show that Mr. Biden knowingly retained national defense information and failed to deliver it to an appropriate government official, and that he knew this conduct was unlawful" Trump acknowledged he willingly and knowingly took them, claimed they were his, and refused to return them. Trump broke the law. Biden did not, no matter how much you try to twist it. There is no equivalence. Give him a break, it tough being "not a Trump supporter, but..." these days.
February 9, 20241 yr 3 hours ago, GreenReaper said: No but my eyes don't matter. For example, when Clinton obstructed justice and destroyed evidence, that was not legal in my eyes, but it was in others. When they made the fake dossier it wasn't legal in my eyes. When Biden clearly is involved with his son's business it is not legal in my eyes. Biden or Trump having classified documents are also not legal in my eyes. But again, it's not my eyes that matter. What I see is one side not even having charges considered for whatever reason (too old and forgetful, likeable old guy, etc.) and the other being charged. The law should be the law no matter who the guilty party is, just apply it equally. You do not know the law. Biden is not "clearly" involved in Hunter's business - despite all the investigations by the House they have come up with nothing to link Joe to Hunter. "having classified documents" is also not illegal unless you knowingly and willfully removed them, and only one of these two old codgers did that - therefore only one is a criminal. It's fortunate that "your eyes" do not matter, because you do not know how to apply the law. Hur's report is literally the sort of document that would be called a partisan hit piece by MAGA world had it been written about Trump. The way that Trump and Biden's cases have been handled would have had republicans howling had the shoe been on the other foot. A special counsel appointed not only by a Republican, but by Trump himself was appointed to investigate Biden, while Trump also was given a Republican appointee. Trump was given eighteen months to return classified documents, and he still refused, while Biden opened up his home and himself to scrutiny. Arguing that the acts committed by these two men are remotely equivalent is ef'ing ridiculous.
February 9, 20241 yr 4 hours ago, Kz! said: Important to remember that Biden was openly supportive of Summer of Floyd riots and his VP pick literally posted links to bail funds for violent arsonists in Minneapolis. lying, as usual. these are his actual words: Quote The country is crying out for leadership. Leadership that can unite us. Leadership that can bring us together. Leadership that can recognize the pain and deep grief of communities that have had a knee on their neck for too long. But there is no place for violence. No place for looting or destroying property or burning churches, or destroying businesses — many of them built by people of color who for the first time were beginning to realize their dreams and build wealth for their families. Nor is it acceptable for our police — sworn to protect and serve all people — to escalate tensions or resort to excessive violence. We need to distinguish between legitimate peaceful protest — and opportunistic violent destruction. Show me where he's "supportive of floyd riots" you dumb b|tch.
February 9, 20241 yr 9 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: It's easy to dunk on someone who consistently allows their emotions to take charge. Plus I hear he's really short, so even easier.
February 9, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, VanHammersly said: Dean Phillips isn't a Putin stooge. The rest are though (aside from Biden of course). He wont be on the ballot. I was referring to Trump, Cornell West, RFK JR, and Jill Stein. All 4 of them are assets of the Kremlin.
February 9, 20241 yr 15 minutes ago, Gannan said: He wont be on the ballot. I was referring to Trump, Cornell West, RFK JR, and Jill Stein. All 4 of them are assets of the Kremlin. Funny thing is that's one seriously eclectic group
February 9, 20241 yr 20 minutes ago, Arthur Jackson said: Funny thing is that's one seriously eclectic group They should all start a polka band or something
February 9, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, Boogyman said: They should all start a polka band or something Cornell on bass bank it
February 10, 20241 yr "If the country we invaded no longer had the means to fight back, the war would be over in weeks.” Dumbest cult in the history of mankind.
February 10, 20241 yr 8 hours ago, Kz! said: Don't mess with the 🐐 I have to imagine you didn't actually watch this interview. Otherwise you wouldn't be bragging about it. This was pathetic.
February 10, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, VanHammersly said: "If the country we invaded no longer had the means to fight back, the war would be over in weeks.” Dumbest cult in the history of mankind. Gee… if only there were a historical event with similarities we could reference back to. Some time long ago when a foreign country spread propaganda into the United States with intentions to keep America out of the war. We could use that historical reference to review the outcome to see if that nation had bad intentions… Welp. I can’t think of anything. Guess we’ll never know what would be the right thing to do…
February 11, 20241 yr On 2/9/2024 at 5:01 PM, Gannan said: He wont be on the ballot. I was referring to Trump, Cornell West, RFK JR, and Jill Stein. All 4 of them are assets of the Kremlin. Do you see any assets of the Kremlin in the room with you right now?
February 11, 20241 yr 4 minutes ago, Procus said: Do you see any assets of the Kremlin in the room with you right now?
February 11, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, Tnt4philly said: Of course you neglect to point out the context - that our NATO allies who are the beneficiaries of the largess of the U.S. have been deadbeats for years and sticking the U.S. Taxpayers will the bills for funding the treaty obligations for THEIR defense. What's your suggestion on how to get European NATO members to honor their funding obligations?
February 11, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, Procus said: Of course you neglect to point out the context - that our NATO allies who are the beneficiaries of the largess of the U.S. have been deadbeats for years and sticking the U.S. Taxpayers will the bills for funding the treaty obligations for THEIR defense. What's your suggestion on how to get European NATO members to honor their funding obligations? Long gone are the days of Reagan worshipping hard liners, the modern day GQP are a bunch of limp-wristed, Miller Lite drinking, pansies who cheer on a moron that sides with our enemies over our allies. You losers deserve a tax-payer funded one-way ticket to Moscow to live out the rest of your days under the dictatorship you've always wanted.
February 11, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, we_gotta_believe said: Long gone are the days of Reagan worshipping hard liners, the modern day GQP are a bunch of limp-wristed, Miller Lite drinking, pansies who cheer on a moron that sides with our enemies over our allies. You losers deserve a tax-payer funded one-way ticket to Moscow to live out the rest of your days under the dictatorship you've always wanted. Your preference is to be under the thumb of a globalist dictatorship that wants our country and its citizens out of the picture. Wait until the U.S. Dollar is no longer the world's reserve currency and your net worth and lifestyle plummet, and your personal safety is in danger in your own backyard. That is what you support, knowingly or not.
February 11, 20241 yr 16 minutes ago, Procus said: Your preference is to be under the thumb of a globalist dictatorship that wants our country and its citizens out of the picture. Wait until the U.S. Dollar is no longer the world's reserve currency and your net worth and lifestyle plummet, and your personal safety is in danger in your own backyard. That is what you support, knowingly or not. No, Secretariat, my preference is to have a president that doesn't encourage our enemies to attack our allies. I feel like that should be a pretty easy thing to understand, but 3 years of shoveling down fistfuls of horse dewormer might be affecting your ability to follow a simple conversation and stay tethered to reality.
February 11, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, Tnt4philly said: Trumpbots: "Biden will start WW3” Trump: "I will start WW3” Trumpbots: "I like how he says what’s on his mind”
Create an account or sign in to comment