July 24, 20214 yr 4 minutes ago, TEW said: It is literally illegal to unmask someone's name and then leak it. Tucker claimed his communications were given by the NSA to a journalist. The NSA just admitted his name was unmasked and that they intercepted his communications. So, yes, it's very consistent with his narrative. Next up -- how did Tucker find out this was happening? Because if, as he says, it came from a journalist who was given the unmasked documents, we have a literal crime. Tucker has those documents, locked safely away in a safe dredged up from the wreck of the Titanic.
July 24, 20214 yr 1 minute ago, Boogyman said: Tucker has those documents, locked safely away in a safe dredged up from the wreck of the Titanic. How exactly do you think he knew the NSA had intercepted his communications and unmasked his name?
July 24, 20214 yr Just now, TEW said: How exactly do you think he knew the NSA had intercepted his communications and unmasked his name? Since it's Tucker I'll assume he made the whole thing up until legit proof if brought forward. He does this all the time, makes allegations and says he has evidence. Teases the story for a while and then moves on to something else.
July 24, 20214 yr 3 minutes ago, Boogyman said: Since it's Tucker I'll assume he made the whole thing up until legit proof if brought forward. He does this all the time, makes allegations and says he has evidence. Teases the story for a while and then moves on to something else. Dude, the NSA admitted they unmasked his name. How would he know that if they hadn't leaked the documents?
July 24, 20214 yr 1 minute ago, TEW said: Dude, the NSA admitted they unmasked his name. How would he know that if they hadn't leaked the documents? I have no idea. But it's Tucker and he is a BS ratings chaser so until I see proof (which he said he has a week ago) I don't believe him. It's pretty simple really. Maybe this time it's legit. But I heard the story of the boy who cried wolf when I was a kid. You should look it up.
July 24, 20214 yr 21 minutes ago, TEW said: Indeed. I see what you did there. You selected certain parts of my comments and omitted the rest. Very Tucker like. But maybe this time you will get to kick that football, Chuck.
July 24, 20214 yr 53 minutes ago, TEW said: It is literally illegal to unmask someone's name and then leak it. Tucker claimed his communications were given by the NSA to a journalist. The NSA just admitted his name was unmasked and that they intercepted his communications. So, yes, it's very consistent with his narrative. Next up -- how did Tucker find out this was happening? Because if, as he says, it came from a journalist who was given the unmasked documents, we have a literal crime. It was a fishing expedition by Tucker. That's the basis of his entire schtick: claim you're being victimized by left wing cabals. He's wrong nearly 100% if the time, so usually he only catches the morons who watch his show and fall for this BS hook, line, and sinker, but he managed to kick up enough dust that they managed to get some kind of investigation. And this investigation appears to have been conducted thoroughly enough that they located the only place his name was even mentioned: by third parties. His claim was that the NSA was actively investigating him in an effort to remove him from the airwaves. This is NOT what happened, so no this is not consistent with his BS story. He wasn't a target of any investigation. Useful idiots will continue to be useful to Tucker, Fox, and co. I guess they can continue to count on your support.
July 24, 20214 yr 54 minutes ago, TEW said: How exactly do you think he knew the NSA had intercepted his communications and unmasked his name? Wait. No. They intercepted communications among others that referenced him and unmasked his name. I didn’t see anywhere where they said they intercepted HIS communications, which is what he stated.
July 24, 20214 yr 3 minutes ago, vikas83 said: Wait. No. They intercepted communications among others that referenced him and unmasked his name. I didn’t see anywhere where they said they intercepted HIS communications, which is what he stated. I intercepted your communication. I regret to inform you that www.indianswithhugecorks.com was banned from the interwebz due to spreading false information.
July 24, 20214 yr So, even after the NSA is busted unmasking him, and Axios printed information about his efforts to interview Putin, that was obtained from the NSA intercepts, we’re still giving the NSA the benefit of the doubt, and claiming it’s Carlson lying about his actual communications being intercepted? Okay.
July 24, 20214 yr 33 minutes ago, vikas83 said: Wait. No. They intercepted communications among others that referenced him and unmasked his name. I didn’t see anywhere where they said they intercepted HIS communications, which is what he stated. Yeah. How did he know they unmasked his name if the unmasked communications weren't leaked?
July 24, 20214 yr 20 minutes ago, The_Omega said: So, even after the NSA is busted unmasking him, and Axios printed information about his efforts to interview Putin, that was obtained from the NSA intercepts, we’re still giving the NSA the benefit of the doubt, and claiming it’s Carlson lying about his actual communications being intercepted? Okay. To be fair it's not like Carlson deserves "the benefit of the doubt" at this point either.
July 24, 20214 yr 54 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: It was a fishing expedition by Tucker. That's the basis of his entire schtick: claim you're being victimized by left wing cabals. He's wrong nearly 100% if the time, so usually he only catches the morons who watch his show and fall for this BS hook, line, and sinker, but he managed to kick up enough dust that they managed to get some kind of investigation. And this investigation appears to have been conducted thoroughly enough that they located the only place his name was even mentioned: by third parties. His claim was that the NSA was actively investigating him in an effort to remove him from the airwaves. This is NOT what happened, so no this is not consistent with his BS story. He wasn't a target of any investigation. Useful idiots will continue to be useful to Tucker, Fox, and co. I guess they can continue to count on your support. No. Useful idiots overlook the fact that his name was unmasked and leaked but claim because they weren't directly spying on him that this is OK. Again, unmasking a name and leaking the documents is illegal. It's a crime. So either you think Tucker made the whole thing up and just got lucky that they happened to have unmasked his name while Axios magically knew what these documents were about, or they unmasked his name and someone leaked the documents and in so doing committed a crime.
July 24, 20214 yr None of this matters anyway. Merrick Garland has already shown that he’s as big a partisan hack as Eric Holder was, so even if illegality is proven beyond doubt, nothing will come of it. As bad as cocaine Mitch sucks, and he does suck, he did the country a huge favor by keeping Garland off of the Supreme Court.
July 24, 20214 yr If only TEW and zuke mustered up this much indignation when their fellow trumpbots stormed the Capitol, leaving 5 dead bodies in their wake, and a national monument desecrated for the first time in two hundred years, all out of fealty to the feckless sore loser they worship so much.
July 24, 20214 yr 2 hours ago, vikas83 said: Wait. No. They intercepted communications among others that referenced him and unmasked his name. I didn’t see anywhere where they said they intercepted HIS communications, which is what he stated. That sort of intellectual honesty disappears when it's decided that integrity is an impediment to political goals.
July 24, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, The_Omega said: None of this matters anyway. Merrick Garland has already shown that he’s as big a partisan hack as Eric Holder was, so even if illegality is proven beyond doubt, nothing will come of it. As bad as cocaine Mitch sucks, and he does suck, he did the country a huge favor by keeping Garland off of the Supreme Court. You have anything to backup that opinion homeboy? Or are you just spouting off baseless partisan nonsense as usual?
July 24, 20214 yr 49 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: If only TEW and zuke mustered up this much indignation when their fellow trumpbots stormed the Capitol, leaving 5 dead bodies in their wake, and a national monument desecrated for the first time in two hundred years, all out of fealty to the feckless sore loser they worship so much. But, the feelings of those aggrieved Jan 6 meanderers are what's really important. Plus I'm sure they had a permit.
July 24, 20214 yr 2 hours ago, TEW said: Yeah. How did he know they unmasked his name if the unmasked communications weren't leaked? I don’t know. He says someone called him and said the NSA leaked it. Ok. Ball’s in Tucker’s court - who is his source?
July 24, 20214 yr Who cares if Tucker Carlson was spied on while trying to contact the Russian government? on a scale of 1 to 10 of things to get upset about this is about a zero.
July 24, 20214 yr 34 minutes ago, vikas83 said: I don’t know. He says someone called him and said the NSA leaked it. Ok. Ball’s in Tucker’s court - who is his source? Tune in to find out!
July 24, 20214 yr 52 minutes ago, vikas83 said: I don’t know. He says someone called him and said the NSA leaked it. Ok. Ball’s in Tucker’s court - who is his source? are you suggesting that the burden of proof is on the accuser? what are you, some kind of victim blamer?
Create an account or sign in to comment