July 24, 20214 yr 35 minutes ago, Dave Moss said: Who cares if Tucker Carlson was spied on while trying to contact the Russian government? on a scale of 1 to 10 of things to get upset about this is about a zero. What we should care about is that his name was unmasked and then communications leaked leaked. Because that is illegal.
July 24, 20214 yr Just now, TEW said: What we should care about is that his name was unmasked and then communications leaked leaked. Because that is illegal. Agree. But we need…what’s it called…actual evidence that his name and the contents were leaked. He claimed it was leaked to numerous reporters, so this shouldn’t be hard to prove if it happened.
July 24, 20214 yr OMG. Looks like a stubbed toe that got angry and sprouted a face. 3 minutes ago, TEW said: What we should care about is that his name was unmasked and then communications leaked leaked. Because that is illegal. They were not his communications. The real issue is why are people that the NSA are monitoring talking about him ??
July 24, 20214 yr 7 minutes ago, vikas83 said: Agree. But we need…what’s it called…actual evidence that his name and the contents were leaked. He claimed it was leaked to numerous reporters, so this shouldn’t be hard to prove if it happened. I mean, Axios reported what the communications were about... How did they know?
July 24, 20214 yr 15 minutes ago, downundermike said: They were not his communications. The real issue is why are people that the NSA are monitoring talking about him ?? They were his communications, delivered via someone the NSA was spying on. Which is fine. And no, there is no issue about them talking about Tucker. He was trying to set up an interview. Zero issue, at all, with this. All perfectly legal and normal.
July 24, 20214 yr 31 minutes ago, TEW said: I mean, Axios reported what the communications were about... How did they know? Because…the Russians leaked that Tucker tried to interview Putin, knowing that their communications were monitored? And knowing Bow Tie Benedict Arnold would use it to so discord? Just as plausible as the NSA leaking it. More plausible in fact. Carlson claimed HIS communications were being monitored and leaked by the NSA. Now the reporting is that the first part of that statement was false. So yeah…I’m not buying the second part given it’s coming from a proven liar.
July 24, 20214 yr Oh look. Axios reported that their sources were talking about communications with "US based Kremlin intermediaries.” https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.axios.com/tucker-carlson-putin-interview-surveillance-c9952d7c-33d7-45e9-be68-2ba4c3817f98.html "Tucker Carlson was talking to U.S.-based Kremlin intermediaries about setting up an interview with Vladimir Putin shortly before the Fox News host accused the National Security Agency of spying on him, sources familiar with the conversations tell Axios.” But wait - there’s more! ” Axios has not confirmed whether any communications from Carlson have been intercepted, and if so, why.” Yeah. Why read things when wild, irresponsible speculation is so much fun.
July 25, 20214 yr 46 minutes ago, TEW said: I mean, Axios reported what the communications were about... How did they know? We should find out when Tucker discloses the evidence he has. Should be any day now, right?
July 25, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, TEW said: What we should care about is that his name was unmasked and then communications leaked leaked. Because that is illegal. Yeah, driving over the speed limit is illegal too.
July 25, 20214 yr 35 minutes ago, vikas83 said: Because…the Russians leaked that Tucker tried to interview Putin, knowing that their communications were monitored? And knowing Bow Tie Benedict Arnold would use it to so discord? Just as plausible as the NSA leaking it. More plausible in fact. Carlson claimed HIS communications were being monitored and leaked by the NSA. Now the reporting is that the first part of that statement was false. So yeah…I’m not buying the second part given it’s coming from a proven liar. No, it's not. Axios being the unwitting tool of a Russian psy-op is not more plausible than the very simple explanation that a US source handed them the info like they've been doing to journalists for years now. Come on dude. Anyway, Carlson claimed that a journalist friend of his received his communications in unmasked documents. That they were intercepted through a third party is inconsequential to any potential illegality of the unmask/leak. 29 minutes ago, vikas83 said: Oh look. Axios reported that their sources were talking about communications with "US based Kremlin intermediaries.” https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.axios.com/tucker-carlson-putin-interview-surveillance-c9952d7c-33d7-45e9-be68-2ba4c3817f98.html "Tucker Carlson was talking to U.S.-based Kremlin intermediaries about setting up an interview with Vladimir Putin shortly before the Fox News host accused the National Security Agency of spying on him, sources familiar with the conversations tell Axios.” But wait - there’s more! ” Axios has not confirmed whether any communications from Carlson have been intercepted, and if so, why.” Yeah. Why read things when wild, irresponsible speculation is so much fun. You're not showing me anything I don't already know. It's not exactly wild speculation at this point. The NSA has admitted it unmasked his name. Now we need to find out why, and if the documents were leaked. And I wonder why Tucker asked Swalwell for the interview? I bet it has nothing to do with his position on the Intelligence committee. He would certainly never leak such documents -- he's such an upstanding guy and all, and definitely handles these sorts of things very well. Just ask Christine Fang...
July 25, 20214 yr 32 minutes ago, Dave Moss said: Yeah, driving over the speed limit is illegal too. Leaking unmasked documents comes with a prison sentence measured in years. Driving over the speed limit comes with a fine. But yeah, totally a great comparison!
July 25, 20214 yr The Truth Man Confronts Tucker Carlson At Montana Store: 'You Are The Worst Human Being' "You are the worst human being known to mankind. I want you to know that,”
July 25, 20214 yr Wasn’t the Lincoln Project recently exposed for covering up for one of their founders who is a pedophile? Says a lot about people who still read them and consider them worthy sources.
July 25, 20214 yr 1 minute ago, The_Omega said: Wasn’t the Lincoln Project recently exposed for covering up for one of their founders who is a pedophile? Says a lot about people who still read them and consider them worthy sources.
July 25, 20214 yr 32 minutes ago, TEW said: No, it's not. Axios being the unwitting tool of a Russian psy-op is not more plausible than the very simple explanation that a US source handed them the info like they've been doing to journalists for years now. Come on dude. Anyway, Carlson claimed that a journalist friend of his received his communications in unmasked documents. That they were intercepted through a third party is inconsequential to any potential illegality of the unmask/leak. You're not showing me anything I don't already know. It's not exactly wild speculation at this point. The NSA has admitted it unmasked his name. Now we need to find out why, and if the documents were leaked. And I wonder why Tucker asked Swalwell for the interview? I bet it has nothing to do with his position on the Intelligence committee. He would certainly never leak such documents -- he's such an upstanding guy and all, and definitely handles these sorts of things very well. Just ask Christine Fang... Slow down on the scotch.
July 25, 20214 yr 34 minutes ago, TEW said: No, it's not. Axios being the unwitting tool of a Russian psy-op is not more plausible than the very simple explanation that a US source handed them the info like they've been doing to journalists for years now. Come on dude. Anyway, Carlson claimed that a journalist friend of his received his communications in unmasked documents. That they were intercepted through a third party is inconsequential to any potential illegality of the unmask/leak. You're not showing me anything I don't already know. It's not exactly wild speculation at this point. The NSA has admitted it unmasked his name. Now we need to find out why, and if the documents were leaked. And I wonder why Tucker asked Swalwell for the interview? I bet it has nothing to do with his position on the Intelligence committee. He would certainly never leak such documents -- he's such an upstanding guy and all, and definitely handles these sorts of things very well. Just ask Christine Fang... Carlson having a friend might be the most unbelievable part about this entire thing.
July 25, 20214 yr 2 minutes ago, Paul852 said: Carlson having a friend might be the most unbelievable part about this entire thing. I'm starting to understand why TEW is so enraged about all this. He must see himself in the joyous human being that is Tucker Carlson.
July 25, 20214 yr 42 minutes ago, TEW said: Anyway, Carlson claimed that a journalist friend of his received his communications in unmasked documents. That they were intercepted through a third party is inconsequential to any potential illegality of the unmask/leak. Yeah, that's what Carlson does. Makes claims and has zero evidence to back it up. He's a pathetic, scum bag, propagandist of the worst kind.
July 25, 20214 yr 49 minutes ago, The_Omega said: Wasn’t the Lincoln Project recently exposed for covering up for one of their founders who is a pedophile? Says a lot about people who still read them and consider them worthy sources. Isn’t there a sitting Republican rep that is a pedophile ??
July 25, 20214 yr 1 minute ago, downundermike said: Isn’t there a sitting Republican rep that is a pedophile ?? Gym Jordan covered up pedophile assault at OSU. He knew about it and did nothing. Joe Paterno at least reported it to his boss and was still forced out because he didn't do more. Gym Jordan is human scum who belongs in Prison. He should be cast down with the Sodomites and passed around like a sex doll. Until his bung hole feels like he was f'ed by a train. That's what he deserves.
July 25, 20214 yr 9 hours ago, TEW said: No, it's not. Axios being the unwitting tool of a Russian psy-op is not more plausible than the very simple explanation that a US source handed them the info like they've been doing to journalists for years now. Come on dude. Anyway, Carlson claimed that a journalist friend of his received his communications in unmasked documents. That they were intercepted through a third party is inconsequential to any potential illegality of the unmask/leak. You're not showing me anything I don't already know. It's not exactly wild speculation at this point. The NSA has admitted it unmasked his name. Now we need to find out why, and if the documents were leaked. And I wonder why Tucker asked Swalwell for the interview? I bet it has nothing to do with his position on the Intelligence committee. He would certainly never leak such documents -- he's such an upstanding guy and all, and definitely handles these sorts of things very well. Just ask Christine Fang... Well Tuckers next show is tomorrow, right? He will probably show us all this evidence he has then and this will all be cleared up.
July 25, 20214 yr 11 hours ago, Dave Moss said: He’s literally a former employee of the CIA. You just can’t make this up.
Create an account or sign in to comment