August 19, 20223 yr 2 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said: She ran a better campaign than Biden. She had a better track record in primaries than Biden. She had bigger crowds and more appearances than Biden. Yeah, one was running in 2016 and the other in 2020. Meanwhile Trump held rallies like normal including one that killed Herman Cain.
August 19, 20223 yr 2 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said: She ran a better campaign than Biden. She had a better track record in primaries than Biden. She had bigger crowds and more appearances than Biden. Yet one set the record for largest percentage turn out in history, set the record for most votes in history, and the other lost. Wait, so while the countries population was at its highest ever, and right in the middle of a global pandemic, and with one of if not the most polarizing incumbent POTUS in our country tries history, you are telling me we had the most voter turnout ever?!?!? That is absolutely shocking, huh? How could that be? Makes no sense, huh? And then you are saying, that in the election with the most voters ever, the guy won also had the most votes a candidate has ever received? Those numbers just don't add up for you, do they?
August 19, 20223 yr 3 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said: A really old dude who smoked and had stage 4 cancer died... wow. shocked. The high voter turnout for the last election is really suspicious to you, isn't it?
August 19, 20223 yr 5 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said: It's funny how much you agree, and believe this government lol You're right, it's a much safer bet to trust the paragon of honesty and integrity that is Donald Trump. He's never steered me wrong before.
August 19, 20223 yr 21 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said: She ran a better campaign than Biden. She had a better track record in primaries than Biden. She had bigger crowds and more appearances than Biden. Yet one set the record for largest percentage turn out in history, set the record for most votes in history, and the other lost. She literally ignored Michigan and WI and didn't campaign there. Epic fail.
August 19, 20223 yr 21 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said: She ran a better campaign than Biden. She had a better track record in primaries than Biden. She had bigger crowds and more appearances than Biden. Yet one set the record for largest percentage turn out in history, set the record for most votes in history, and the other lost. Bacarty having a legit learning disability just proven. This is what stupid looks like when it gets desperate.
August 19, 20223 yr 28 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Ok so one thing I don't get is... if Fetterman wins in PA, that seat flips to blue, but where's the other seat flipping to red that would keep the result a 50/50 split? Or would the dems then have a 51/49 seat advantage with a Fetterman win, and Warnock holding on in GA? Reps had a tough road to begin with and it's only gotten tougher. Obviously, Fetterman's in a great place. But also Johnson's down quite a bit to Barnes in Wisconsin. Vance seems to be holding firm with a pretty small lead in Ohio, so that might be one place where an R can hold. NC looks about dead even. Even FL looks surprisingly tight. But all of those are R Incumbents (or an R stepping down). If one of NC/FL goes blue, that gives Dems a 3 seat advantage, and I don't see anyway the Republicans can make that up. In states with an incumbent Dem, Nevada looks like a healthy Dem lead (although I know polling's always spotty in Nev) and Kelly's polling well in AZ. And then of course there's Warnock here, which is the tightest of these races, but all the polling has Warnock with at least a slight lead. And even if Hershel's dumba** wins, I think the best case scenario for the right is that the Senate stays exactly the way it is now, with Harris casting the deciding vote. But it looks like the likeliest scenario is the Dems picking up either 2 or 3 seats.
August 19, 20223 yr 24 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said: She ran a better campaign than Biden. She had a better track record in primaries than Biden. She had bigger crowds and more appearances than Biden. Yet one set the record for largest percentage turn out in history, set the record for most votes in history, and the other lost. Bigger crowds! Hilary was a strong candidate was not the take I was expecting to read this morning.
August 19, 20223 yr 3 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said: This is the problem with "you people" I didnt bring up Trump, I didnt say trust Trump, I didnt say he was honest or had integrity. The problem with you people, and about 48% of this country is it's all of nothing. 1 thing doesnt mean the other. Not trusting the government, doesnt mean i'm a trumpster. thinking the government, both parties are scumbags doesnt mean I love trump. It actually has nothing to do with Trump. The Government was EXTREMELY corrupt well before Trump and will be way after we all die. "Crowd size!" Lmao
August 19, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, Bacarty2 said: This is the problem with "you people" I didnt bring up Trump, I didnt say trust Trump, I didnt say he was honest or had integrity. The problem with you people, and about 48% of this country is it's all of nothing. 1 thing doesnt mean the other. Not trusting the government, doesnt mean i'm a trumpster. thinking the government, both parties are scumbags doesnt mean I love trump. It actually has nothing to do with Trump. The Government was EXTREMELY corrupt well before Trump and will be way after we all die. Oh my apologies, for a minute I thought you were talking about the 2020 election. Otherwise it would've been really weird to bring up the guy you claim Biden lost to.
August 19, 20223 yr 3 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: Reps had a tough road to begin with and it's only gotten tougher. Obviously, Fetterman's in a great place. But also Johnson's down quite a bit to Barnes in Wisconsin. Vance seems to be holding firm with a pretty small lead in Ohio, so that might be one place where an R can hold. NC looks about dead even. Even FL looks surprisingly tight. But all of those are R Incumbents (or an R stepping down). If one of NC/FL goes blue, that gives Dems a 3 seat advantage, and I don't see anyway the Republicans can make that up. In states with an incumbent Dem, Nevada looks like a healthy Dem lead (although I know polling's always spotty in Nev) and Kelly's polling well in AZ. And then of course there's Warnock here, which is the tightest of these races, but all the polling has Warnock with at least a slight lead. And even if Hershel's dumba** wins, I think the best case scenario for the right is that the Senate stays exactly the way it is now, with Harris casting the deciding vote. But it looks like the likeliest scenario is the Dems picking up either 2 or 3 seats. Ok so then it's accurate to say if Fetterman and Warnock win, and all else remains as is, it's a 51/49 split?
August 19, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, Bacarty2 said: My point exactly. This has nothing to do with Trump and you've brought him up 3 times. It was a comparison between D-nominees. So when discussing how a candidate has performed in a general election, you should definitely never bring up who they ran against. Got it, now. Thanks for clarifying.
August 19, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, Bacarty2 said: My point exactly. This has nothing to do with Trump and you've brought him up 3 times. It was a comparison between D-nominees. Trump in no way is having or will have any impact on the 2022 midterms? Odd take, but ok.
August 19, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, we_gotta_believe said: Ok so then it's accurate to say if Fetterman and Warnock win, and all else remains as is, it's a 51/49 split? Yeah, but I'd put money on Dems adding 1 more, either Wisconsin, Ohio or NC.
August 19, 20223 yr Just now, VanHammersly said: Yeah, but I'd put money on Dems adding 1 more, either Wisconsin, Ohio or NC. Don't hold your breath Ohio or Florida. They're lost causes.
August 19, 20223 yr Just now, we_gotta_believe said: Don't hold your breath Ohio or Florida. They're lost causes. Yeah, I have a really tough time seeing Rubio going down. In most states attacking the FBI for doing their job and investigating a traitor would probably hurt him, but this is Florida we're talking about. Plus, he's an incumbent. Ohio's different since it's an open seat, but obviously it's been really red for the past few cycles. With a candidate like Vance though, you never know. Still, NC or, more likely, WI are the most likely pick ups. And just one of them and it puts you at 52-48, which is the number they need to hit to work around Manchin and Sinema.
August 19, 20223 yr 27 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said: Hilary on Michigan... "In Michigan, where polls showed us ahead but not by as much as we’d like, we had nearly 140 more staff on the ground than (President) Obama did in 2012, and spent 166 percent more on television,” Clinton writes. "I visited seven times during the general election. By the way, I dont think President potato went any where but his basement, and I'm fairly sure he couldnt find Michigan on a map.
August 19, 20223 yr 26 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: Bigger crowds! Hilary was a strong candidate was not the take I was expecting to read this morning. Biden Derangement Syndrome is so bad republicans are wishing we had president Hillary! More of this please!!!!!!!
August 19, 20223 yr 2 minutes ago, Gannan said: Biden Derangement Syndrome is so bad republicans are wishing we had president Hillary! More of this please!!!!!!!
August 19, 20223 yr 56 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said: She ran a better campaign than Biden. She had a better track record in primaries than Biden. She had bigger crowds and more appearances than Biden. Yet one set the record for largest percentage turn out in history, set the record for most votes in history, and the other lost.
August 19, 20223 yr 1 hour ago, Bacarty2 said: She ran a better campaign than Biden. She had a better track record in primaries than Biden. She had bigger crowds and more appearances than Biden. Yet one set the record for largest percentage turn out in history, set the record for most votes in history, and the other lost. One ran against a current President who loads of people including nearly all of the swing vote had hated for four years. It is really very very simple.
August 19, 20223 yr 5 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: One ran against a current President who loads of people including nearly all of the swing vote had hated for four years. It is really very very simple. And it is pretty much a fact that if voting was mandatory, Democrats would win.
August 19, 20223 yr 9 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: These I believe. I’m skeptical of Demings over Rubio though.
August 19, 20223 yr Author 1 hour ago, VanHammersly said: Reps had a tough road to begin with and it's only gotten tougher. Obviously, Fetterman's in a great place. But also Johnson's down quite a bit to Barnes in Wisconsin. Vance seems to be holding firm with a pretty small lead in Ohio, so that might be one place where an R can hold. NC looks about dead even. Even FL looks surprisingly tight. But all of those are R Incumbents (or an R stepping down). If one of NC/FL goes blue, that gives Dems a 3 seat advantage, and I don't see anyway the Republicans can make that up. In states with an incumbent Dem, Nevada looks like a healthy Dem lead (although I know polling's always spotty in Nev) and Kelly's polling well in AZ. And then of course there's Warnock here, which is the tightest of these races, but all the polling has Warnock with at least a slight lead. And even if Hershel's dumba** wins, I think the best case scenario for the right is that the Senate stays exactly the way it is now, with Harris casting the deciding vote. But it looks like the likeliest scenario is the Dems picking up either 2 or 3 seats. Which is crazy considering the advantage Republicans typically have in the Senate. Just how it breaks for this election. If Biden has a strong second half of his term and things are good economically (big if) wonder how 2024 shapes up. Still a long way to go.
Create an account or sign in to comment