17 minutes ago, downundermike said:

Once you add Brooks and all the dummy void stuff for guys like Nelson, Eagles soar back into first place with $51,890,633 in dead cap for 2022.  Good job cap guy.

 

 

 

3 hours ago, Godfather said:

Time to get rid of Brooks

 

2 hours ago, NOTW said:

 

 

 dead cap and retired has-been

On 1/16/2022 at 8:45 PM, opa-opa said:

I want someone to ask Siriani who his #1 QB for next year and see what he says.

He would praise Jalen, but I doubt he commits to anything and neither will Roseman. With that being the case I highly doubt it will be anyone but Hurts. 
 

Edit: I found this tweet and it’s more than I thought he would say. Not the typical evaluating every position type of comment. This sounds like he and the organization are content with Hurts. 

1 hour ago, EazyEaglez said:

He would praise Jalen, but I doubt he commits to anything and neither will Roseman. With that being the case I highly doubt it will be anyone but Hurts. 
 

Edit: I found this tweet and it’s more than I thought he would say. Not the typical evaluating every position type of comment. This sounds like he and the organization are content with Hurts. 

No matter what anyone thinks about Hurts, the good news if they are sold on him - at least for 2022 - is the potential to use this year's draft picks on other positions. 

8 hours ago, NOTW said:

 

 

Why would Brooks retiring add to the Eagles cap hell?  Isn't that on him?  Or does that automatically trigger a delayed bonus of some kind?

19 minutes ago, Philthy Jawn said:

Why would Brooks retiring add to the Eagles cap hell?  Isn't that on him?  Or does that automatically trigger a delayed bonus of some kind?

I was just showing Godfather that Brooks retired. See the 2022 cap topic for details.

47 minutes ago, Philthy Jawn said:

Why would Brooks retiring add to the Eagles cap hell?  Isn't that on him?  Or does that automatically trigger a delayed bonus of some kind?

Doesn't add to cap hell - clears room on the cap relative to what he would have been if he was on the roster. It increases the dead cap though which is how many cap dollars are being spent on players not on the team at all. His guaranteed money (which is spread for the life of the contract) still needs to be paid and gets accelerated to this year for cap purposes. Essentially treats him the same way as if he was cu.

Press conference today.  Siri on WRs and should they get a free agent:  Smith is a "true #1," likes Watkins (mentioned him before Reagor).  Called Watkins the #2 wideout, said he can be one of the best #2 wideouts in the NFL someday based on what he's seen in the NFL.

And then Jalen Reagor: we want more production, has skill and talent, like him in that #3 position.  What we're considering a #3 receiver, we want to see him make plays.  Then mentioned Ward as a leader.  Then talked about the blocking element from JJAW, "the Enforcer" in the run game.  He's pleased with the group, since they ran so much you're not going to have the same stats from WRs.

12 hours ago, NOTW said:

Press conference today.  Siri on WRs and should they get a free agent:  Smith is a "true #1," likes Watkins (mentioned him before Reagor).  Called Watkins the #2 wideout, said he can be one of the best #2 wideouts in the NFL someday based on what he's seen in the NFL.

And then Jalen Reagor: we want more production, has skill and talent, like him in that #3 position.  What we're considering a #3 receiver, we want to see him make plays.  Then mentioned Ward as a leader.  Then talked about the blocking element from JJAW, "the Enforcer" in the run game.  He's pleased with the group, since they ran so much you're not going to have the same stats from WRs.

Maybe he’s at least learned that Smith should be the one catching the screens instead of blocking for them. 😂

On 1/17/2022 at 1:20 AM, Random Reglar said:

For all the whining about Jalen Hurts,  who took the Eagles from a 4 win to a 9 win team,  who has taken the Eagles to the playoffs 100% of the time.

This really isn't all that impressive when you look at the injuries the team had last year.  At one point the only 1st stringers starting on offense were the QB and the center.  It looks even less impressive when you realize that we only beat one team with a winning record this year and that was probably because they were starting their 3rd string QB.  Yes, they out performed expectations, but lets try to be a little realistic about why that happened.

Sitting on fence for hurts but this would be a pipe dream 

1. Trade 2nd or Hopefully 3rd for ridley (read couple of articles that 2nd would do it). Ridley probably would come for our health support and hurts and Smith 

2. Read an article for dolphins suggesting trading sanders for devante Parker. Contract aside not bad probably 

3. Load up on D with 2 firsts and trade the 3rd first for next year's first and some

4. Hopefully Gannon gets hired and we can pick an experienced D Coordinator. Quinn changed the girls pretty quick so there is a chance if we get fangio or Zimmer (don't know if they would want it though)

5. Let Barnett a penalty waiting to happen walk

6. Cut JJAW

7. Draft Ariza in 5th and cut siposs

8. Another dart would be at say Gallup or A Rob in free agency 

9. Raegor should be put on competition in camp. If doesn't perform, cut him

10. Mike Clay can go if we find someone good. We never did anything on special teams.

 

On 1/16/2022 at 4:18 PM, UK_EaglesFan89 said:

This is going to be a long but interesting off season. 

I have no idea where this team goes from here. 

The D lacks top end talent. The QB is not good enough. They have 3 first round picks but not in great spots. So yeah not a great outlook. 

LMAO........it's never enough is it?  

3 first round picks and you're whining about "spots"??  WTF?  That's just ridiculous........they have a sh-- load of draft picks, they'll have plenty of salary cap room for some signings and even have trade assets.

They have a young, developing QB, a strong offensive line with depth, a stable of talented running backs.  I realize QB development around here is too hard a concept for most posters to grasp. But a new "project QB" is the last thing they need.

Defensively, they need talent, which they are in a prime position to add multiple pieces.

But it's never enough is it?  Not a great out look??  no idea where the team goes from here?? 

I think your problem is you can't see positives EVER.

On 1/17/2022 at 2:24 AM, UK_EaglesFan89 said:

See you know what... I don't get why Howie will not use a first on a LB. I know Dallas lost yesterday but look at their LBs, look at the impact Parsons had. I mean that team had a good record and had a chance at a higher seeding. Look at White against us yesterday. A good LB can absolutely transform a defense. 

It seems like "the Eagles don't selects LBs early" is a good enough reason for everyone to accept that BS.

LBs are typically the heart and soul of a defense, no LBs/no defense as far as I'm concerned......and I'm not speaking of drag down tacklers, give me some hitters!!

On 1/20/2022 at 9:02 AM, birdman#12 said:

 

3 first round picks and you're whining about "spots"??  WTF?  That's just ridiculous........they have a sh-- load of draft picks, they'll have plenty of salary cap room for some signings and even have trade assets.

 

I do agree having 3 1st rd picks is something to feel extremely positive about ... the only reason to be a bit skeptical is due to Howie's drafting background where he has had much more success with players taken in the first half of round 1 during his tenure as GM vs hitting on ZERO picks with players taken in the 2nd half (which is where all of our picks are).  I get it picking earlier usually leads to more success but he has not hit on a single player taken in round 1 later than 14.  But just have to hope he continues to learn lessons from past mistakes (Reagor being the most recent) and will stick to the board set by the scouts rather than go by his own guy when making picks and perhaps we'll have better luck.  

2 hours ago, EagleVA said:

It seems like "the Eagles don't selects LBs early" is a good enough reason for everyone to accept that BS.

LBs are typically the heart and soul of a defense, no LBs/no defense as far as I'm concerned......and I'm not speaking of drag down tacklers, give me some hitters!!

I don't think people accept that BS I just think we know Howie doesn't value the position. 

2 hours ago, time2rock said:

I do agree having 3 1st rd picks is something to feel extremely positive about ... the only reason to be a bit skeptical is due to Howie's drafting background where he has had much more success with players taken in the first half of round 1 during his tenure as GM vs hitting on ZERO picks with players taken in the 2nd half (which is where all of our picks are).  I get it picking earlier usually leads to more success but he has not hit on a single player taken in round 1 later than 14.  But just have to hope he continues to learn lessons from past mistakes (Reagor being the most recent) and will stick to the board set by the scouts rather than go by his own guy when making picks and perhaps we'll have better luck.  

I say this every offseason.  People say more picks is great, or trading back to collect extra picks...but Howie doesn't draft well most of the time.  Every team hits on players sometimes of course.  But in the 1st round, he does well in the higher half because it's easier to stick to the board, take the more "obvious" choice and not reach.  Look at his drafts since he took over after Reid left:

Picks in the top 15:

Lane Johnson
Carson Wentz
Derek Barnett
DeVonta Smith

Picks after 15:

Marcus Smith
Andre Dillard
Jalen Reagor

2 hours ago, time2rock said:

But just have to hope [Howie …] will stick to the board set by the scouts rather than go by his own guy when making picks and perhaps we'll have better luck.  

What I don’t understand is what makes you so sure that Howie has not stuck to the board set by the scouts rather than go with his own guy (whatever that means) in the past.  I mean, absolutely, Howie is responsible for the picks that are ultimately made because he hires the scouts and he runs the draft process and needs to be held accountable, but for all we know, Howie bows to the scouts over his own instincts and that’s when he makes mistakes.  I feel very confident none of us on this board have any idea which is the case.

14 minutes ago, BayAreaLennie said:

What I don’t understand is what makes you so sure that Howie has not stuck to the board set by the scouts rather than go with his own guy (whatever that means) in the past.  I mean, absolutely, Howie is responsible for the picks that are ultimately made because he hires the scouts and he runs the draft process and needs to be held accountable, but for all we know, Howie bows to the scouts over his own instincts and that’s when he makes mistakes.  I feel very confident none of us on this board have any idea which is the case.

There were reports/rumors as recently as 2 years ago that the scouts were strongly suggesting Jefferson and he went with Reagor.

https://fansided.com/2021/04/04/eagles-howie-roseman-overruled-scouts-draft/

 There have been similar reports/rumors in the past … I’m sure if you were really interested you’d be able to find them. 

1 hour ago, NOTW said:

I say this every offseason.  People say more picks is great, or trading back to collect extra picks...but Howie doesn't draft well most of the time.  Every team hits on players sometimes of course.  But in the 1st round, he does well in the higher half because it's easier to stick to the board, take the more "obvious" choice and not reach.  Look at his drafts since he took over after Reid left:

Picks in the top 15:

Lane Johnson
Carson Wentz
Derek Barnett
DeVonta Smith

Picks after 15:

Marcus Smith
Andre Dillard
Jalen Reagor

Honestly, the only pick in the Top 15 that I give a thumbs up to is Lane Johnson.

On 1/17/2022 at 8:28 AM, brkmsn said:

This team lacks player leadership. 

Speaking of player leadership, I think showing Cox the door would help in that area, he's a highly regarded vet that gives pretty much zero effort, that's a boatload of negative leadership.

1 hour ago, NOTW said:

I say this every offseason.  People say more picks is great, or trading back to collect extra picks...but Howie doesn't draft well most of the time.  Every team hits on players sometimes of course.  But in the 1st round, he does well in the higher half because it's easier to stick to the board, take the more "obvious" choice and not reach.  Look at his drafts since he took over after Reid left:

Picks in the top 15:

Lane Johnson
Carson Wentz
Derek Barnett
DeVonta Smith

Picks after 15:

Marcus Smith
Andre Dillard
Jalen Reagor

Missing Cox and Graham in top 15 as well as Agholor and the fireman from after 15.  

45 minutes ago, time2rock said:

Missing Cox and Graham in top 15 as well as Agholor and the fireman from after 15.  

Cox, Graham and Watkins were picked by Reid, Agholor by Chip in the year he had sole control.

38 minutes ago, NOTW said:

Cox, Graham and Watkins were picked by Reid, Agholor by Chip in the year he had sole control.

I recall Cox being a Washburn hand picked player but was only mentioning players picked in round 1 since Howie was promoted to GM and assumed control of the draft (2010).  

1 hour ago, time2rock said:

I recall Cox being a Washburn hand picked player but was only mentioning players picked in round 1 since Howie was promoted to GM and assumed control of the draft (2010).  

No he was given an exec title in 2010 but Reid was still VP of Player Personnel and controlled the draft.

3 hours ago, EagleVA said:

Speaking of player leadership, I think showing Cox the door would help in that area, he's a highly regarded vet that gives pretty much zero effort, that's a boatload of negative leadership.

https://memes.getyarn.io/yarn-clip/f2814e8a-0390-4a22-a864-0d6d36680178