Just now, EagleJoe8 said:

They needed to win.

What would have changed if they lost?

Will there be a 6th walk off game in a row?! 

1 minute ago, pisceschica said:

No the saints would’ve taken their spot if they lost. 

I stand corrected

Just now, NJWolverEagle11 said:

What would have changed if they lost?

Like Pisces said, the Saints would have been in instead.

56 minutes ago, 20dawk4life said:

Where’s the bar? 

The Greyhound off of N Figueroa st 

1 minute ago, EagleJoe8 said:

Like Pisces said, the Saints would have been in instead.

👌

Wow. If they lose this challenge they have no more timeouts.

Mcvay is challenging fumble. 
No timeouts if they lose and no challenges left 

What a terrible challenge. That was not even close 🤣

Rams lose the challenge! 

That was worse than the first one to challenge. 

1 minute ago, pisceschica said:

What a terrible challenge. That was not even close 🤣

McVay is a strange coach. He’s both good and bad 

LMAO

How do you drop that int?! 
 

This is why I don’t trust stafford; keeping both teams in the game 

Tartt drops an easy INT. 

2 minutes ago, toolg said:

Tartt drops an easy INT. 

Reagor’d

Loss of about 4 on 3rd and 3 

Tied at 17.

22 minutes ago, LacesOut said:

C'mon 9ers!! Hold onto this lead!!

Aaaaaaannnndd nevermind.

McVey is dump as. Has all world talent on both sides but continues to choke in the biggest games under pressure 

Apparently Ramsey can't catch either

Rams starting with good field position 

Clutch play by Kupp

Kupp. If rams score a td I don’t think Jimmy g can lead them to a td 

TMW.

Is Kupp untouchable? Would love him in Philly