June 30, 20232 yr 16 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said: She didn't have a vote in the ruling. That's recusal. It's not complicated. for someone who is trying to troll it is.
June 30, 20232 yr 3 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said: Did she impact the Harvard decision? No. That's recusal. The reason you recuse is a conflict of interest that may impact your judgement. She wasn't party to the judgement. There's she recused. Writing an opinion about it after the fact is irrelevant. Fair enough, she recused herself from voting in the Harvard case. She also should have declined to be on the formal dissenting opinion that includes the Harvard case imho. At minimum, the opinion should make clear that her inclusion only reflects upon the UNC case.
June 30, 20232 yr 3 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: Fair enough, she recused herself from voting in the Harvard case. She also should have declined to be on the formal dissenting opinion that includes the Harvard case imho. At minimum, the opinion should make clear that her inclusion only reflects upon the UNC case. i think that's a bit of nitpicking .i think her opinion can be whatever she voices as long as she had no bearing on the decision.
June 30, 20232 yr 1 minute ago, Alpha_TATEr said: i think that's a bit of nitpicking .i think her opinion can be whatever she voices as long as she had no bearing on the decision. Ok, I agree her opinion can be whatever she wants and she can voice it. What I disagree with is her doing it in the formal dissenting opinion.
June 30, 20232 yr 6 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: Ok, I agree her opinion can be whatever she wants and she can voice it. What I disagree with is her doing it in the formal dissenting opinion. we can agree to disagree on that. let me say though, i'm not a big expert on the supreme court so i may be niave in thinking there's no issue with it. i am glad that she did recuse herself unlike some other sc judges have on issues.
June 30, 20232 yr 1 minute ago, vikas83 said: Court strikes down Biden's student loan forgiveness. Good.
June 30, 20232 yr 17 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said: we can agree to disagree on that. let me say though, i'm not a big expert on the supreme court so i may be niave in thinking there's no issue with it. i am glad that she did recuse herself unlike some other sc judges have on issues. Yep, we can disagree on that single point. We agree with the rest.
June 30, 20232 yr 11 hours ago, NOTW said: These replies though There are countless twitter threads about how she is really a trans woman, and that the baby eating liberal cabal who rigs all the elections is pushing the trans agenda in order to pave the way for her to be the first trans president. If you read through twitter these are NOT conspiracy theories to those discussing it, its total fact. Im surprised the insanity hasn't made its way here through the usual right wing twitter dorks who post that kind of nonsense here.
June 30, 20232 yr 4 minutes ago, Gannan said: There are countless twitter threads about how she is really a trans woman, and that the baby eating liberal cabal who rigs all the elections is pushing the trans agenda in order to pave the way for her to be the first trans president. If you read through twitter these are NOT conspiracy theories to those discussing it, its total fact. Im surprised the insanity hasn't made its way here through the usual right wing twitter dorks who post that kind of nonsense here. I think most of those looney tunes (I think MR CYN was the birther moron?) gave up after being laughed at daily. Even Kz and lynched seem to have lost steam (low energy, no stamina, sad) leaving only a rube from the dumbest state in the country left to defend Dear Leader. Hate to see it.
June 30, 20232 yr 15 minutes ago, vikas83 said: Court strikes down Biden's student loan forgiveness. Good. It's actually bull crap. I've posted this before, once the SC (and everyone else) said it was ok for Trump to divert congressionally appropriated funds for his wall, then all bets were off. Biden should literally cut the pentagon budget to pay for this just to make a point (or at least threaten to). This SC is just a political extension of the republican party and its total nonsense making a mockery of our entire system. Im not saying I'm for the Biden loan forgiveness plan. Im saying its bull crap that Trump can do whatever the hell he wants, and a president from the other side can't. It's laughable. These are unelected politicians appointed for life carrying out the wishes of their party. Nothing more.
June 30, 20232 yr 8 minutes ago, Gannan said: It's actually bull crap. I've posted this before, once the SC (and everyone else) said it was ok for Trump to divert congressionally appropriated funds for his wall, then all bets were off. Biden should literally cut the pentagon budget to pay for this just to make a point (or at least threaten to). This SC is just a political extension of the republican party and its total nonsense making a mockery of our entire system. Im not saying I'm for the Biden loan forgiveness plan. Im saying its bull crap that Trump can do whatever the hell he wants, and a president from the other side can't. It's laughable. These are unelected politicians appointed for life carrying out the wishes of their party. Nothing more. A flaw in the system that needs to be corrected. Trump shouldn't have had all the power thru executive decision that he had and neither should Biden. Also, it goes further back then these last two POTUS.
June 30, 20232 yr Govt would get rid of this act if they cared but they don't Student loans first became nondischargeable in bankruptcy in 1976 as part of § 439A Higher Education Act of 1976.
June 30, 20232 yr 12 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: A flaw in the system that needs to be corrected. Trump shouldn't have had all the power thru executive decision that he had and neither should Biden. Also, it goes further back then these last two POTUS. Should Trump get back into office this SC will let him spend money on whatever flights of fancy he wants and we all know it. Nothing is being corrected. The SC is merely making the law of the land to read "Republican presidents have unlimited power to spend how they see fit. Democratic presidents do not"
June 30, 20232 yr 3 minutes ago, Gannan said: Should Trump get back into office this SC will let him spend money on whatever flights of fancy he wants and we all know it. Nothing is being corrected. The SC is merely making the law of the land to read "Republican presidents have unlimited power to spend how they see fit. Democratic presidents do not" Right and the tables would turn if the Dems "owned" the court. It needs to be corrected.
June 30, 20232 yr 32 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: I think most of those looney tunes (I think MR CYN was the birther moron?) gave up after being laughed at daily. Even Kz and lynched seem to have lost steam (low energy, no stamina, sad) leaving only a rube from the dumbest state in the country left to defend Dear Leader. Hate to see it. Aww look at you, did you impress your friends with this post? Sorry I continually embarrass you so much. Of course I have no idea what youre talking about with respect to Michelle Obama, but you do you.
June 30, 20232 yr 30 minutes ago, Gannan said: It's actually bull crap. I've posted this before, once the SC (and everyone else) said it was ok for Trump to divert congressionally appropriated funds for his wall, then all bets were off. Biden should literally cut the pentagon budget to pay for this just to make a point (or at least threaten to). This SC is just a political extension of the republican party and its total nonsense making a mockery of our entire system. Im not saying I'm for the Biden loan forgiveness plan. Im saying its bull crap that Trump can do whatever the hell he wants, and a president from the other side can't. It's laughable. These are unelected politicians appointed for life carrying out the wishes of their party. Nothing more. Lol wow so triggered by a guy who's been out of office for 3 years. Very libertarian post. So how much do you owe in student loan debt?
June 30, 20232 yr 22 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: A flaw in the system that needs to be corrected. Trump shouldn't have had all the power thru executive decision that he had and neither should Biden. Also, it goes further back then these last two POTUS. Yeah the last sentence is the key one. I acknowledge there's no power on earth strong enough to prevent TDS, but Obama expanded executive power far more than any other POTUS and you all probably cheered him on when he did it because Obama was so cool.
June 30, 20232 yr 5 minutes ago, Mike31mt said: Aww look at you, did you impress your friends with this post? Sorry I continually embarrass you so much. Of course I have no idea what youre talking about with respect to Michelle Obama, but you do you. Sucks that all your trumpbot friends left you to fend for yourself. It's ok bud, we'll still gladly mock you for being the toothless moron that you are if you're that starved for attention.
June 30, 20232 yr 43 minutes ago, Gannan said: There are countless twitter threads about how she is really a trans woman, and that the baby eating liberal cabal who rigs all the elections is pushing the trans agenda in order to pave the way for her to be the first trans president. If you read through twitter these are NOT conspiracy theories to those discussing it, its total fact. Im surprised the insanity hasn't made its way here through the usual right wing twitter dorks who post that kind of nonsense here. I've seen stuff like that in social media comments, I thought it was just a dumb joke but then there are people who believe it and have "evidence."
June 30, 20232 yr Just now, we_gotta_believe said: Sucks that all your trumpbot friends left you to fend for yourself. It's ok bud, we'll still gladly mock you for being the toothless moron that you are if you're that starved for attention. Left me to myself to defend what??? Are you making up you own conversations again?
June 30, 20232 yr 1 minute ago, Mike31mt said: Left me to myself to defend what??? He's pretending like he doesn't defend trump at every turn again
Create an account or sign in to comment