Jump to content

Eagles' Avonte Maddox out indefinitely with torn pec, per report; potential trade targets to help Philly's 'D'


time2rock
 Share

Recommended Posts

Eagles' Avonte Maddox out indefinitely with torn pec, per report; potential trade targets to help Philly's 'D'

The slot corner, who has struggled to stay healthy, will undergo surgery

Cody Benjamin
 
 
19 hrs ago
 
image.png.9ace8a77f38c6e1abff202059441ce61.png

The Eagles were without starting cornerback James Bradberry when they edged the Vikings in Week 2. Now they're set to be without fellow starter Avonte Maddox for additional games, and perhaps the rest of the 2023 season. Maddox is set to undergo surgery for a torn pectoral suffered against Minnesota, per NFL Media, and will be sidelined indefinitely as a result.

The sixth-year veteran, who's manned the Eagles' slot cornerback job for much of his career, reportedly had an MRI and sought additional medical opinions before electing for surgery. He's a lock to be moved to injured reserve (IR), where he'll be guaranteed at least a four-game absence. Typically, pec tears require anywhere from four to six months to heal after surgery, as CBS News reported.

Maddox has been productive when healthy, logging 31 career pass deflections at the nickel spot. But injuries have plagued him for years, as he's yet to play a full NFL season and has also finished multiple seasons on IR. He's the second vet in the Eagles secondary to suffer a potential season-ending injury this year, after special teamer Zech McPhearson tore his Achilles in the preseason.

With Maddox out and Bradberry still recovering from a concussion, it's possible the Eagles will turn to the trade market to explore emergency help in the defensive backfield. 

Here are three possible targets:

image.png.480008632f15959377c2bbc2cf940081.png

Baker is expensive (due $17.9 million in 2023) but could be cut without much penalty in 2024, and he wanted out of Arizona as recently as the spring, before the Cardinals moved some money around to placate the All-Pro. While his listed position is safety, he's more of a chess piece who plays bigger than he looks. At 0-2, Arizona could soon be motivated to sell, and at 27, Baker -- who just sat out Week 2 -- could still project as a longer-term addition for Eagles general manager Howie Roseman.

image.png.657eed4509584ea33c813fee891b45f8.png

Eagles fans have probably already had their fair share of Mills, who spent the first five years of his career as a confident but merely passable starting corner/safety. But you could do a lot worse scouring for last-minute secondary reinforcements. Relegated to more of a reserve role behind Kyle Dugger, Jabrill Peppers and rookie Christian Gonzalez in New England, Mills still adores Philly, is on a very affordable deal that only runs through 2023 and has experience at almost every spot in the secondary.

image.png.c9eb42289e04d6b27f27d6354923c4f8.png

The former Browns veteran drew high praise from new Texans coach DeMeco Ryans after a busy Week 1, touting both speed and physicality out of the slot. But at 27, on a one-year deal for a rebuilding club, he shouldn't be off limits for an in-season move if Houston covets additional draft capital. One of PFF's highest-graded slot cover men early in 2023, Thomas could conceivably replace Maddox while allowing Bradberry to remain on the outside once healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, UK_EaglesFan89 said:

Budda Baker would be great but he’s not exactly a replacement for Maddox. And I’m not sure Mills would be either? And Mills on the outside is just a big no no.

Agreed, even though Mills is now a veteran. But on affordable contract Mills would be excellent safety depth. Doesn‘t solve the slot situation but well worth it anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Infam said:

Agreed, even though Mills is now a veteran. But on affordable contract Mills would be excellent safety depth. Doesn‘t solve the slot situation but well worth it anyways.

I mean yeah I agree that he’s be good S depth but then do we really need that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...