Jump to content

Featured Replies

Just now, Arthur Jackson said:

So Israel should stop right now, right?

Israel should be working in good faith to conclude a ceasefire agreement.

  • Replies 8.6k
  • Views 173.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • I'm here, thanks VaBeach. I appreciate all the EMB members that support us in these days, I does matter. The members that support the other side… I'm speechless.  

  • Propaganda? Or hard truths terrorist sympathizers don't want to hear?

Posted Images

45 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

We all know that you don't understand what the term means by now so you don't have to remind us.

Remember when Trump said he knew more about war than his generals?  That’s what you sound like in this thread.

Just now, EaglesRocker97 said:

Israel should be working in good faith to conclude a ceasefire agreement.

I like that (I do)

then what?

  • Author
1 minute ago, Dave Moss said:

Remember when Trump said he knew more about war than his generals?  That’s what you sound like in this thread.

I don't think there are more than two posters in here who agree with you.  You are simply misguided on this topic.

2 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

I don't think there are more than two posters in here who agree with you.  You are simply misguided on this topic.

A bunch of guys who work in finance, or IT, or engineering don’t agree with me?  You don’t say….

But Eagles Rocker, who teaches high school history does….  Very interesting.

4 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

A bunch of guys who work in finance, or IT, or engineering don’t agree with me?  You don’t say….

But Eagles Rocker, who teaches high school history does….  Very interesting.

I'm an exotic dancer

1 minute ago, Arthur Jackson said:

I'm an exotic dancer

Where at?

23 minutes ago, Arthur Jackson said:

So Israel should stop right now, right?

 

4 hours ago, EaglesRocker97 said:

Yeah, more dismissiveness when pinned down.

 

4 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

Where at?

Freelance.

I did the bowling alley circuit for a while but lately I'm making my best margins working old lady quilting clubs. Never would have thought. 

  • Author
4 minutes ago, Arthur Jackson said:

Freelance.

I did the bowling alley circuit for a while but lately I'm making my best margins working old lady quilting clubs. Never would have thought. 

Guess gay bowling just ain’t what it used to be. 

  • Author
19 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

A bunch of guys who work in finance, or IT, or engineering don’t agree with me?  You don’t say….

But Eagles Rocker, who teaches high school history does….  Very interesting.

Revenge of the Nerds. Get with the program history wokester. 

5 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

Guess gay bowling just ain’t what it used to be. 

fun fact: you know bowling pins aren't allowed on airplanes?

4 minutes ago, Arthur Jackson said:

fun fact: you know bowling pins aren't allowed on airplanes?

What about candlepins?

20 minutes ago, Arthur Jackson said:

Freelance.

I did the bowling alley circuit for a while but lately I'm making my best margins working old lady quilting clubs. Never would have thought. 

Let me guess - barn animals are somehow involved 

6 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

What about candlepins?

 

4 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

Let me guess - barn animals are somehow involved 

now you're just being ridiculous 

40 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

A bunch of guys who work in finance, or IT, or engineering don’t agree with me?  You don’t say….

But Eagles Rocker, who teaches high school history does….  Very interesting.

So careers that require critical thinking vs reading from the lesson plan is your flex? 
 

:lol: 

  • Author
4 minutes ago, paco said:

So careers that require critical thinking vs reading from the lesson plan is your flex? 
 

:lol: 

Your bleached bung hole is likely more impressive

4 hours ago, EaglesRocker97 said:

I think that Israel has more than nullified their capacity to do so right now. If you think the only solution to that is by wiping out the entire Palestinian population, then that really is no solution at all.

Well considering the Gaza Strip has an annual population growth rate of 2% per year, with a current population of 2.1 million.   And estimates so far, even going by the inflated Hamas numbers stand at around 35,000 deaths in 7 months.  If this rate of death were to continue perpetually, then the entire population of Gaza would be wiped out in about 90-100 years.   Israel must really suck at this whole genocide thing. 

12 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

Your bleached bung hole is likely more impressive

did he show you? it's show us your bunghole wednesday

Just now, Phillyterp85 said:

Well considering the Gaza Strip has an annual population growth rate of 2% per year, with a current population of 2.1 million.   And estimates so far, even going by the inflated Hamas numbers stand at around 35,000 deaths in 7 months.  If this rate of death were to continue perpetually, then the entire population of Gaza would be wiped out in about 90-100 years.   Israel must really suck at this whole genocide thing. 

The genocide of Native Americans in NA continued for like 300 years so I guess the British / U.S. weren’t great at it either by your standards.

1 hour ago, EaglesRocker97 said:

That is just not true.

 

https://lieber.westpoint.edu/proportionality-international-humanitarian-law-principle-rule/

 

Well, this is doing a pretty poor job of it. There is zero chance of eliminating Hamas with this kind of approach. When you wreak large-scale destruction on an entire population and its ability to subsist while providing no hope for a better life in the future, it will only radicalize more of them while undermining your alliances.

Please tell me the proper approach to eliminating a military organization in an urban setting that entrenches itself within civilian infrastructure.

4 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

The genocide of Native Americans in NA continued for like 300 years so I guess the British / U.S. weren’t great at it either by your standards.

LOLOLOL last I checked 300 years ago there were no planes, helicopters, tanks and cars to quickly transport military personnel from one location to another. Last I checked 300 years ago there were no bombs, missiles, drones, automatic weapons etc that could inflict massive damage in a short period.   Last I checked native Americans didn’t live in an area that comprised 141 square miles. 

And last I checked, the Native American population declined steeply from 1500 to 1800.   Meanwhile, the population in the Gaza Strip has done nothing but grow, from about 120,000 people in 1950 to 2.1 million people today and has one of the highest growth rates in the world. 
You are correct, there is certainly a segment of people in this discussion who don’t understand what the term genocide means.

1 hour ago, EaglesRocker97 said:

That is just not true.

 

https://lieber.westpoint.edu/proportionality-international-humanitarian-law-principle-rule/

 

Well, this is doing a pretty poor job of it. There is zero chance of eliminating Hamas with this kind of approach. When you wreak large-scale destruction on an entire population and its ability to subsist while providing no hope for a better life in the future, it will only radicalize more of them while undermining your alliances.

Also, I’d like you explain how this war has been disproportionate using the descriptions in the link you provided. 

31 minutes ago, Phillyterp85 said:

LOLOLOL last I checked 300 years ago there were no planes, helicopters, tanks and cars to quickly transport military personnel from one location to another. Last I checked 300 years ago there were no bombs, missiles, drones, automatic weapons etc that could inflict massive damage in a short period.   Last I checked native Americans didn’t live in an area that comprised 141 square miles. 

And last I checked, the Native American population declined steeply from 1500 to 1800.   Meanwhile, the population in the Gaza Strip has done nothing but grow, from about 120,000 people in 1950 to 2.1 million people today and has one of the highest growth rates in the world. 
You are correct, there is certainly a segment of people in this discussion who don’t understand what the term genocide means.

You seem to think a genocide has to happen in a certain amount of time.  It doesn’t.

15 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

You seem to think a genocide has to happen in a certain amount of time.  It doesn’t.

I certainly do not think that.  If I did, then I would think that native Americans weren’t the victims of genocide.

You seem to think a genocide can happen while simultaneously the victims of said genocide have one of the highest population growth rates in the world.  That leaves two potential possibilities: 1) the perpetrators of said genocide, despite their vast military and technological advantage must really suck at being genociders, or 2) there actually isn’t anything closely resembling a genocide happening.

Create an account or sign in to comment