Tuesday at 05:54 PM1 day 4 minutes ago, Phillyterp85 said:Perfidy sounds like a made up word. Like when they were creating words, and were in the 5th straight month of working 12 hour shifts, at the end of a long day, and trying to come up with the word for disguising a military plane, someone just went "oh ffs just call it perfidy so we can get the heck out of here and go home"
Tuesday at 07:27 PM1 day 1 hour ago, Phillyterp85 said:Perfidy sounds like a made up word. Like when they were creating words, and were in the 5th straight month of working 12 hour shifts, at the end of a long day, and trying to come up with the word for disguising a military plane, someone just went "oh ffs just call it perfidy so we can get the heck out of here and go home"I'm sure the Viceroy of Venezuela will confirm that it was indeed not perfidy
Tuesday at 08:34 PM1 day Listening to Rand Paul totally demolish the WH bullsheet when it comes to Venezuela. Totally wipes all their arguments off the map. This is on the Joe Rogan podcast dropped on YouTube today.On another topic he "both sides" the issues with the federal deficit and debt.
Tuesday at 09:27 PM1 day 49 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:Listening to Rand Paul totally demolish the WH bullsheet when it comes to Venezuela. Totally wipes all their arguments off the map. This is on the Joe Rogan podcast dropped on YouTube today.On another topic he "both sides" the issues with the federal deficit and debt.A Libertarian both sidesing Trump's economic policies should tell you all you need to know about Paul. Congrats on being consistent on your stance of non-intervention. You're still a sniveling cuck that has enabled this shitshow.
Tuesday at 09:42 PM1 day 14 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:A Libertarian both sidesing Trump's economic policies should tell you all you need to know about Paul. Congrats on being consistent on your stance of non-intervention. You're still a sniveling cuck that has enabled this shitshow.He wasn't both siding Trump's economic policies. He was both siding the overall problems we have with the deficit and how it got to where it is at this point.
Tuesday at 09:48 PM1 day 5 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:He wasn't both siding Trump's economic policies. He was both siding the overall problems we have with the deficit and how it got to where it is at this point.Reasonable stance by itself. But the dude has voted with Trump like 95% of the time. If you're truly against expansion of federal government, explosion of the deficit, and foreign intervention, that does not jive.
Tuesday at 09:52 PM1 day 2 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:Reasonable stance by itself. But the dude has voted with Trump like 95% of the time. If you're truly against expansion of federal government, explosion of the deficit, and foreign intervention, that does not jive.I'm just telling you what he said today. I'm not defending his record. In any case, at least it wasn't a total deek suck of Trump or MAGA.
Tuesday at 10:20 PM1 day 12 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:I'm just telling you what he said today. I'm not defending his record. In any case, at least it wasn't a total deek suck of Trump or MAGA.My frustration isn't directed at you. I'm just so fed up with these a-holes grandstanding on their principles while voting consistently for self preservation. Rand is just one of many (on both sides. Both sides).
Tuesday at 10:24 PM1 day 34 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:Reasonable stance by itself. But the dude has voted with Trump like 95% of the time. If you're truly against expansion of federal government, explosion of the deficit, and foreign intervention, that does not jive.Yeah he was very different in the first term. Scaramucci made a good point that many of these guys see themselves as the 48th president and posturing as such. I think that definitely applies to Paul. Doesn't mean what he's saying is wrong, it's just personally motivated.
Tuesday at 10:26 PM1 day 4 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:My frustration isn't directed at you. I'm just so fed up with these a-holes grandstanding on their principles while voting consistently for self preservation. Rand is just one of many (on both sides. Both sides).Oh I didn't think you were directing it at me. I hear what your saying and I agree. Additionally, there is some value in him going on Rogan and sheeting on Trump.
Tuesday at 11:21 PM1 day 53 minutes ago, Gannan said:Yeah he was very different in the first term. Scaramucci made a good point that many of these guys see themselves as the 48th president and posturing as such. I think that definitely applies to Paul. Doesn't mean what he's saying is wrong, it's just personally motivated.Any R that actually has a shot at the office is going know to play it cool until ‘32. Everyone else is delusional. Unless of course the DNC puts up the dumbest candidate.So 50/50 really.
Tuesday at 11:32 PM1 day 10 minutes ago, Bill said:Any R that actually has a shot at the office is going know to play it cool until ‘32. Everyone else is delusional.Unless of course the DNC puts up the dumbest candidate.So 50/50 really.Didn’t you predict Kamala getting over 320 electoral votes
Create an account or sign in to comment