I guess none of you saw the Gettysburg Hearing

1 hour ago, matchew88 said:

I guess none of you saw the Gettysburg Hearing

"Hearing" is a bit of a stretch for what that was.  But we watched Giuliani screech a bunch of baseless conspiracy theories and easily refutable lies at a crowded room full of maskless morons, yes. 

 

This sheet gets really nuts at about 2:30  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gIAtDxyTaM

9 minutes ago, Eaglesfandan said:

This sheet gets really nuts at about 2:30  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gIAtDxyTaM

I'll definitely be donating to that channel. Holy hell are those some scary people.

21 minutes ago, Eaglesfandan said:

This sheet gets really nuts at about 2:30  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gIAtDxyTaM

   

13 hours ago, DEagle7 said:

"Hearing" is a bit of a stretch for what that was.  But we watched Giuliani screech a bunch of baseless conspiracy theories and easily refutable lies at a crowded room full of maskless morons, yes. 

That's weird, because he didnt do most of the talking. And there were a couple of smoking guns there too, including at 55 mins

3 minutes ago, matchew88 said:

That's weird, because he didnt do most of the talking. And there were a couple of smoking guns there too, including at 55 mins

Do tell. What smoking guns?

1 hour ago, matchew88 said:

That's weird, because he didnt do most of the talking. And there were a couple of smoking guns there too, including at 55 mins

Smoking guns that they had no interest in presenting in open court where there are rules. Just slobber them wildly into an open microphone, call it fraud and see what happens. 

It's a pretty tremendous magic trick how all this evidence suddenly disappears when there's a court of law and someone is held accountable to present facts and not the sort of conjecture your crazy uncle posts on facebook.

These guys are a joke. And anybody still listening to them after seeing how they've been exposed as liars time and time again is a sucker. There's one born every minute.

43 minutes ago, Smokesdawg said:

Smoking guns that they had no interest in presenting in open court where there are rules. Just slobber them wildly into an open microphone, call it fraud and see what happens. 

PA Court is democratic, wouldn't give a hearing. The State Congress would. It will go to the Supreme Court

2 hours ago, DrPhilly said:

Do tell. What smoking guns?

You mean, like proving 604k votes for Biden were injected into the voting system remotely, in an impossible speed? Guys, actually watch these things. Actually read the GA case. 

26 minutes ago, matchew88 said:

You mean, like proving 604k votes for Biden were injected into the voting system remotely, in an impossible speed? Guys, actually watch these things. Actually read the GA case. 

Cases need evidence. There is none.

A state with a Trump-supporting Republican governor, a Trump-supporting Secretary of State overseeing the election, and a hand recount have all seen Biden win.

It's embarrassing at this point that after what we've seen of the president's case for fraud that some are still in the denial and bargaining stages.

He lost. 

37 minutes ago, matchew88 said:

You mean, like proving 604k votes for Biden were injected into the voting system remotely, in an impossible speed? Guys, actually watch these things. Actually read the GA case. 

I’ve watched this and lots of other similar pressers, etc. All they have is theory. Get back to me when they actually have a gun that is smoking instead of a cartoon about one. 

2 hours ago, matchew88 said:

PA Court is democratic, wouldn't give a hearing. The State Congress would. It will go to the Supreme Court

Elections have consequences since PA Supreme Court is elected.  
So why didn’t they present it to the Federal judge in Williamsport who is a member of the federalist society that ultimately got appealed to the third circuit court of appeals where a trump appointee wrote the opinion?  I’m still not seeing your logic.... 

And even if they commit judicial malpractice and overturn PA voters... Biden still has 286. 

8 minutes ago, Smokesdawg said:

Elections have consequences since PA Supreme Court is elected.  
So why didn’t they present it to the Federal judge in Williamsport who is a member of the federalist society that ultimately got appealed to the third circuit court of appeals where a trump appointee wrote the opinion?  I’m still not seeing your logic.... 

And even if they commit judicial malpractice and overturn PA voters... Biden still has 286. 

It’s impossible to win a case without evidence.

i figured that even Trumpbots knew this.

 

6 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

It’s impossible to win a case without evidence.

i figured that even Trumpbots knew this.

 

They do.  They are just confused as to what the word "evidence" means.

2 hours ago, matchew88 said:

You mean, like proving 604k votes for Biden were injected into the voting system remotely, in an impossible speed? Guys, actually watch these things. Actually read the GA case. 

You people are so gullible it hurts. They proved F all, which is why they can't bring any of this BS to court. Just absolutely embarrassing that anyone is falling for this.

6 hours ago, matchew88 said:

That's weird, because he didnt do most of the talking. And there were a couple of smoking guns there too, including at 55 mins

we got a live one here, guys

 

4 hours ago, DEagle7 said:

You people are so gullible it hurts. They proved F all, which is why they can't bring any of this BS to court. Just absolutely embarrassing that anyone is falling for this.

Instead of seeing with your own eyes, you're still looking for clues to tell you quickly. It's kind of lazy. This hearing is an initial process anyways. So when the cyber security expert holds up the voting trend graph by candidate, it will be granted the attention of the higher court. 

Perhaps you could take advantage of our lazy thinking with a bet of some sort...

6 minutes ago, Ugluk said:

Perhaps you could take advantage of our lazy thinking with a bet of some sort...

Hell I'll put $50 bucks up via paypal and bet anyone in here who thinks Trump will be president on February 1st 2021.

27 minutes ago, matchew88 said:

 

Instead of seeing with your own eyes, you're still looking for clues to tell you quickly. It's kind of lazy. This hearing is an initial process anyways. So when the cyber security expert holds up the voting trend graph by candidate, it will be granted the attention of the higher court. 

12 minutes ago, Ugluk said:

Perhaps you could take advantage of our lazy thinking with a bet of some sort...

 

6 minutes ago, SPIDER-MAN said:

Hell I'll put $50 bucks up via paypal and bet anyone in here who thinks Trump will be president on February 1st 2021.

I'd say it's ethically questionable to take money from the mentally ill

29 minutes ago, matchew88 said:

Instead of seeing with your own eyes, you're still looking for clues to tell you quickly. It's kind of lazy. This hearing is an initial process anyways. So when the cyber security expert holds up the voting trend graph by candidate, it will be granted the attention of the higher court. 

I watched the stupid conference.  The burden of proof is on them and yet they presented none.  And no this isn't an "initial part of the process",  Most court cases don't start with a batsheet crazy town hall where one side's screeches conspiracy theories at the camera and present zero hard evidence.  Not to mention the election has been over for a month now with Trump losing dozens of court cases already for this BS.

Trump lost.  He received less votes and less electoral votes.  He's whining of fraud cause he's an egotistical conman who wants to save face and grift as much money as possible from his dumbest supporters on his way out the door. Hard stop.