July 7, 20214 yr Good God... https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-hitler-comment-john-kelly_n_60e54831e4b04238fb588116
July 7, 20214 yr 3 minutes ago, vikas83 said: Good God... https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-hitler-comment-john-kelly_n_60e54831e4b04238fb588116 The uneducated mind of a raving, lunatic, and white supremacist.
July 7, 20214 yr 36 minutes ago, vikas83 said: Good God... https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-hitler-comment-john-kelly_n_60e54831e4b04238fb588116
July 7, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, vikas83 said: Good God... https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-hitler-comment-john-kelly_n_60e54831e4b04238fb588116 Somewhere, Kz's wondering if it's too late to vote for Trump again in the 2020 election.
July 7, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, vikas83 said: Good God... https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-hitler-comment-john-kelly_n_60e54831e4b04238fb588116 Is this worse than someone knowing Hitler was a painter in his early days?
July 7, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, vikas83 said: Very stable genius... So he's going class action, huh? You know Trump has a track record in court: Quote Between the lines: Trump has often sued people in the course of his career, but rarely actually followed through in terms of winning a judgment or even taking cases to trial. But he will make some lawyers richer!
July 7, 20214 yr 4 minutes ago, vikas83 said: Just breathtakingly stupid People should be forced to pay for the time/money wasted on these things.
July 7, 20214 yr 8 minutes ago, Paul852 said: People should be forced to pay for the time/money wasted on these things. Sadly, tort reform never happens because the trial lawyers' lobby owns the Democratic party.
July 7, 20214 yr 2 hours ago, jsdarkstar said: The uneducated mind of a raving, lunatic, and white supremacist. So much about this is quintessential orange moron. Once again the overt praising of a white supremacist (fine people on both sides), the contrarian hot take of telling a 5-star general that one of the most reviled and despicable humans in history actually did a lot of good things, the dementia induced confusion of WW1 with WW2. It's everything trumpbots voted for and will gladly do it again.
July 7, 20214 yr 19 minutes ago, vikas83 said: Just breathtakingly stupid Unbelievable. These people walk around, can read and write and possibly dress themselves.
July 7, 20214 yr 46 minutes ago, toolg said: So he's going class action, huh? You know Trump has a track record in court: But he will make some lawyers richer! Only if they ask to be paid in full up front.
July 7, 20214 yr 50 minutes ago, toolg said: But he will make some lawyers richer! Unless that lawyers first name starts with Rudy and last name begins with Giuliani.
July 7, 20214 yr I can't stop laughing Quote 11. Defendants deplatformed Plaintiff at the behest of, with cooperation from, and the approval of, Democrat lawmakers. Quote 56. Democrat legislators in Congress feared Plaintiff’s skilled use of social media as a threat to their own re-election efforts. These legislators exerted overt coercion, using both words and actions, upon Defendants to have Defendants censor the views and content with which Members of Congress disagreed with, of both the Plaintiff and the Putative Class Members. Trump is the one who demanded 230 be repealed, but... Quote 60. Below are just some examples of Democrat legislators threatening new regulations, antitrust breakup, and removal of Section 230 immunity for Defendants and other social media platforms if Facebook did not censor views and content with which these Members of Congress disagreed, including the views and content of Plaintiff and the Putative Class Members: Quote 64. With this coercion directed at Defendants by repeatedly requiring their appearance at hearings, and reinforcing their potential to impose regulations, and strip them of 230 immunity, Democrat legislators intended to force Defendants into permanently banning Plaintiff’s access to his Facebook account, his followers, and the public at large. The ancillary benefit was to deny the public access to Plaintiff’s content and views. Quote 65. The message conveyed by Democrat legislators to Defendants was clear: use the authority of Section 230 to ban Plaintiff and those Putative Class Members who posted content and views contrary to these legislators preferred points of view or lose the competitive protections of Section 230 and tens of billions of dollars of market share altogether. Donald Trump -- champion of civil discourse: Quote 67. With Plaintiff removed from Facebook, it is considerably more difficult for Plaintiff to act as head of the Republican Party, campaign for Republican candidates, fundraise, and lay the groundwork for his own potential campaign run for the 2024 Republican Party nomination for President of the United States. 68. Likewise, with Plaintiff now removed from Facebook and other social media platforms, it has ended balanced, direct public discussions between competing political views on national and local issues. Admitting you agreed to the TOS. Bold strategy: Quote 83. Neither Plaintiff nor Putative Class Members were free to decline the speech restrictions imposed by Facebook in its TOS if they wished to use the Facebook platform. Use of its platform was expressly conditioned on agreeing to these restrictions, or User access was denied Fauci and the CDC control Facebook!!! Quote 101. Another example of Defendants working directly with government actors to censor free speech was when Plaintiff and Putative Class Members supported the view that hydroxychloroquine might be an effective, preventative option to protect against the coronavirus. 102. Plaintiff and Putative Class Members’ posts about hydroxychloroquine were censored by Facebook, as only the narrative crafted by Dr. Fauci, NIAID, and the CDC was allowed on Facebook regarding best practices for treating the novel COVID-19. Defendant Zuckerberg has admitted to this in his House Anti-trust Hearing testimony on July 29, 2020. "So we do take that down,” Zuckerberg told a House panel, treading on hydroxychloroquine. "It has not been proven to cure COVID,” Zuckerberg told Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI). "Some of the data suggests that it might be harmful to people,” although medical professionals openly disagreed with Zuckerberg’s conclusion, and it has been approved for other ailments like malaria for decades. 103. Plaintiff also expressed the view on Facebook that COVID-19 originated in the Wuhan laboratory in China and would specifically refer to it as the "China virus.” 104. Subsequently, Facebook Users posting comments discussing the Wuhan laboratory in China as the origin of COVID-19 or referring to COVID-19 as the "China virus” were similarly censored (flagged, shadow banned, etc.)
July 7, 20214 yr These are his lawyers. Seem legit: https://www.ibolaw.com/ https://vargasgonzalez.com/
July 7, 20214 yr 1 minute ago, vikas83 said: These are his lawyers. Seem legit: https://www.ibolaw.com/ https://vargasgonzalez.com/ That first link is so close to "I BLOW"
July 7, 20214 yr 14 minutes ago, vikas83 said: Plaintiff’s skilled use of social media Liddle' bit of a stretch there.
July 7, 20214 yr I mean, the basic argument is that the 1st Amendment should apply to Facebook and Twitter, because they communicated with the government. This lawsuit will be thrown out by a competent judge. It just might not reach one in the Southern District of Florida, but it will at the Circuit Court. It's whack job conspiracies in a legal brief.
July 7, 20214 yr I don't think Trump's victim mentality works with the Court system, but it works with voters and they'll give him money. That's why this lawsuit is a winning strategy for him.
July 7, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, vikas83 said: Just breathtakingly stupid 1 hour ago, Dave Moss said: Depends on your definition of #winning. After four years we know that Trump's definition of winning only extends to the edge of his personal space.
Create an account or sign in to comment