July 19, 20223 yr So, between BWI, LAX, and the plane ride today, my "Trump for Prison" t-shirt has been a hit with both young and old alike. Maybe there's hope yet for America...
July 20, 20223 yr On 7/19/2022 at 12:04 PM, vikas83 said: Two New York state residents were charged with illegally using funds from Chinese and Singaporean investors to donate $600,000 to then-President Donald Trump's re-election campaign in 2017, U.S. prosecutors said on Monday. The scheme was part of an effort by Sherry Li and Lianbo Wang to showcase political connections as they sought funds to build a China-themed park in upstate New York, prosecutors said, adding that they raised $27 million in investment, but never completed the project. ------------------------ Grifters gotta grift
July 21, 20223 yr Truth Social Users Are Fuming Over ‘Censorship’ on Trump’s Platform Claims of "censorship” are flying on Donald Trump’s alternative social media platform, Truth Social. The main point of contention among users is that Trump’s site continues to apply "sensitive content” notices obscuring some posts, including a popular anti-Biden meme that mocks the president over increasing inflation rates. "This content may not be suitable for all audiences,” the notice states. That content warning has also covered up a popular graphic depicting Jesus Christ and a quote from the Bible with a gray filter, leaving users fuming. "Truth Social loves censorship,” one user wrote, whose bio on the site included the hashtag "NoMoreRINOs.”
July 22, 20223 yr Author Quote Former President Donald Trump went on a massive tirade late Thursday night after the House select committee on the Jan 6th riot concluded their latest public hearing, with Trump ending his night by trashing Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) as a "disloyal sleaze bag!" wow...he sounds mad.
July 22, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, Alpha_TATEr said: at this point, you have to be a sea cumber to still support this POS. Probably enough sea cucumbers in the country to get him elected in 24 unfortunately
July 22, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, Jsvand12 said: Probably enough sea cucumbers in the country to get him elected in 24 unfortunately not sure about that any longer. more & more trumpers i know are putting up desantis in '24 signs. he's trump without the trump.
July 22, 20223 yr Just now, Alpha_TATEr said: not sure about that any longer. more & more trumpers i know are putting up desantis in '24 signs. he's trump without the trump. Problem is there won’t be a primary and he’s going to be the GOP candidate
July 22, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, Alpha_TATEr said: not sure about that any longer. more & more trumpers i know are putting up desantis in '24 signs. he's trump without the trump. zero point zero chance DeSantis beats out Trump in a primary, assuming they even have them Just now, Jsvand12 said: Problem is there won’t be a primary and he’s going to be the GOP candidate beat me to it
July 22, 20223 yr at that point the gop should just start campaigning as the fascist party and stop the charade.
July 22, 20223 yr More and more republicans in elected positions are calling for a primary. Who knows, maybe they will even get one. The problem s if they run a whole clown car full of candidates, Trump will win again. The only was someone beats him is if republicans line up behind one anti-Trump candidate (probably DeSantis).
July 22, 20223 yr 5 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said: at that point the gop should just start campaigning as the fascist party and stop the charade. at that point?
July 22, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, Gannan said: More and more republicans in elected positions are calling for a primary. Who knows, maybe they will even get one. The problem s if they run a whole clown car full of candidates, Trump will win again. The only was someone beats him is if republicans line up behind one anti-Trump candidate (probably DeSantis). Amazing right? Trump is the only way the GOP loses the next presidential election but that’s the exact direction they are going to go
July 22, 20223 yr 5 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: at that point? you know that was a little tongue and cheek. the only reason i haven't switched to an independent is so i can vote against this dope in a primary. because you know, I'm not a sea cucumber.
July 22, 20223 yr Author 24 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said: at this point, you have to be a sea cumber to still support this POS. those sea cucumbers really do exist. i mean, there's a segment of the population that only watches fox news & hasn't been following the jan 6 hearings at all...or think it's all a partisan witch hunt. they genuinely believe that the 2020 election was stolen from cheeto and that dems are evil & trying to destroy our country. those folks are voting trump no matter what.
July 22, 20223 yr Just now, Alpha_TATEr said: you know that was a little tongue and cheek. the only reason i haven't switched to an independent is so i can vote against this dope in a primary. because you know, I'm not a sea cucumber. Elections without open primaries are still weird to me. Just let everyone vote for whoever they want to vote for without having to jump through hoops.
July 22, 20223 yr Author 1 minute ago, jsdarkstar said: Yesterday, is hard word for the Criminal to say. LOL. someone with a lot more editing talent & time on their hands than me needs to splice together cheeto singing the beatles' song yesterday. i will laugh.
July 22, 20223 yr Just now, mr_hunt said: someone with a lot more editing talent & time on their hands than me needs to splice together cheeto singing the beatles' song yesterday. i will laugh. I hope some one does it. Also a Josh Hawley video
July 22, 20223 yr 3 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: those sea cucumbers really do exist. i mean, there's a segment of the population that only watches fox news & hasn't been following the jan 6 hearings at all...or think it's all a partisan witch hunt. they genuinely believe that the 2020 election was stolen from cheeto and that dems are evil & trying to destroy our country. those folks are voting trump no matter what. oh no doubt there will be a certain portion that can never be reached with reason and logic. the dems should reach out in a gesture of peace and offer them unlimited reynolds aluminum foil.
July 22, 20223 yr 2 hours ago, mr_hunt said: yesterday....yesterday...that's a hard word for me. Y words, V words...those are tough words to say guys.
July 22, 20223 yr Quote Trump signed an executive order, "Creating Schedule F in the Excepted Service,” in October 2020, which established a new employment category for federal employees. It received wide media coverage for a short period, then was largely forgotten in the mayhem and aftermath of Jan. 6 — and quickly was rescinded by President Biden. Sources close to Trump say that if he were elected to a second term, he would immediately reimpose it. Tens of thousands of civil servants who serve in roles deemed to have some influence over policy would be reassigned as "Schedule F” employees. Upon reassignment, they would lose their employment protections. New presidents typically get to replace more than 4,000 so-called "political” appointees to oversee the running of their administrations. But below this rotating layer of political appointees sits a mass of government workers who enjoy strong employment protections — and typically continue their service from one administration to the next, regardless of the president’s party affiliation. An initial estimate by the Trump official who came up with Schedule F found it could apply to as many as 50,000 federal workers — a fraction of a workforce of more than 2 million, but a segment with a profound role in shaping American life. Trump, in theory, could fire tens of thousands of career government officials with no recourse for appeals. He could replace them with people he believes are more loyal to him and to his "America First” agenda. Even if Trump did not deploy Schedule F to this extent, the very fact that such power exists could create a significant chilling effect on government employees. It would effectively upend the modern civil service, triggering a shock wave across the bureaucracy. The next president might then move to gut those pro-Trump ranks — and face the question of whether to replace them with her or his own loyalists, or revert to a traditional bureaucracy.
Create an account or sign in to comment