April 3, 20232 yr 17 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said: His schtick is making poor arguments that are easily refuted then blaming it on "not being part of the clique". Which is ridiculous because we barely tolerate one another here. We spend most of the time here telling each other how dumb and wrong they are. I think he's wrong. The fact you all have tolerated me for as long as you have is testament to this group's inclusivity. Also... John Snow's hot little fire-crotch Wildling girlfriend had better hair than John Snow.
April 3, 20232 yr TUBTHOUGHTS 3: THE CURD IS THE WORD Why do they call it cottage cheese? Is it made of little houses? tubthoughts
April 3, 20232 yr 9 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: He could literally walk out on 5th avenue, hang Mike pence on live tv and he wouldn't lose a single voter. A few here would turn themselves into pretzels defending it as well.
April 3, 20232 yr 8 minutes ago, Tweek said: He could literally walk out on 5th avenue, hang Mike pence on live tv and he wouldn't lose a single voter. A few here would turn themselves into pretzels defending it as well. At first I thought that maybe if he was caught buggering children that would make his followers turn on him, but I don't think that's a redline for them either.
April 3, 20232 yr 23 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Sarah coming in hot with the beetlejuice gif three days later! It's nice to see Zuke mock Trump for once.
April 3, 20232 yr So the indicated POS is now at Trump Tower. Can't wait for tomorrow, when get to read the indictment.
April 3, 20232 yr 59 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said: So the indicated POS is now at Trump Tower. Can't wait for tomorrow, when get to read the indicatment. Fixed
April 4, 20232 yr Fox news is really slurping the Donny knob. This arrest, is an arrest of all of us. No one is safe. If a former president can have his lawyer pay hush money to a porn star, while hiding the source of money and claiming it as a business expense, all of us could be indicted for paying hush money and trying to hide the source. Outrageous.
April 4, 20232 yr We shouldn't allow taxpayer funded attorneys general to engage in political witch hunts of former presidents. But not every investigation of former presidents are witch hunts. The crime that Trump is being indicted for in New York City is one that is prosecuted somewhat regularly. Justice is never applied universally because they're just aren't enough resources in the criminal justice system. But when there are credible reports of business records being falsified by someone with that level of influence and authority, the attorney general would be derelict in their duty not to investigate. And if that investigation yield enough evidence to convince a grand jury to indict a former president, then it's incumbent upon the attorney general to seek the indictment. So while it may be accurate to say that this crime is not always prosecuted, it's absolutely true to say that when the knowledge and evidence is as well known as it is for Trump that it absolutely is. This is the cost of becoming so high profile, and being so bad at trying to cover one's tracks for political gain.
April 4, 20232 yr 1 minute ago, JohnSnowsHair said: We shouldn't allow taxpayer funded attorneys general to engage in political witch hunts of former presidents. But not every investigation of former presidents are witch hunts. The crime that Trump is being indicted for in New York City is one that is prosecuted somewhat regularly. Justice is never applied universally because they're just aren't enough resources in the criminal justice system. But when there are credible reports of business records being falsified by someone with that level of influence and authority, the attorney general would be derelict in their duty not to investigate. And if that investigation yield enough evidence to convince a grand jury to indict a former president, then it's incumbent upon the attorney general to seek the indictment. So while it may be accurate to say that this crime is not always prosecuted, it's absolutely true to say that when the knowledge and evidence is as well known as it is for Trump that it absolutely is. This is the cost of becoming so high profile, and being so bad at trying to cover one's tracks for political gain. He could also just not be a serial fraudster. One can do honest work.
April 4, 20232 yr 24 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Yeah, if they engage in criminal conduct and their is evidence of the crime and witnesses, then go for it. However, a manufactured case, without evidence, won't fly. But the GOP is all about spite. The Dems did this, so we must do it to them. A bunch of 5 yr. olds.
April 4, 20232 yr 11 hours ago, mr_hunt said: unhinged lunatic... yeah, because in Trump's world, the leaking of info, is a more serious crime, then what Trump will be charged with. Attacking the DA's wife. Sick. I hope the Judge addresses this stuff today.
Create an account or sign in to comment