18 minutes ago, mr_hunt said:

they love it!

 

dude rattles off a bunch of non-white countries & insinuates they have impure blood & magas be like... 

I have "Final Solution" on my Trump 2024 bingo card. Its only a matter of time before it pops out during one of his rants. 

4 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said:

This opinion opens the door for a further challenge on the 14th Amendement. They didn't fully decide the issue.

The Minnesota Supreme Court declined to become the first in history to use Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to prevent someone from running for the presidency. The court dodged the central question of the lawsuit — does Trump’s role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol disqualify him from the presidency — by ruling that state law allows parties to put whomever they want on the primary ballot.

"There is no state statute that prohibits a major political party from placing on the presidential nomination primary ballot, or sending delegates to the national convention supporting, a candidate who is ineligible to hold office,” Chief Justice Natalie Hudson ruled.

This all sets up his run for a 3rd term should he win. 

Free Speech For the People appealed last week’s ruling by the state court of appeals to the Michigan Supreme Court that the Republican Party can place whomever they want on the ballot for its presidential primary, regardless of whether they’re qualified for the office or not.

The move potentially places the future of Trump’s candidacy before yet another state supreme court. The Minnesota Supreme Court already kept Trump on the ballot, likewise saying the courts can’t strike candidates from the primary ballot and inviting the plaintiffs to try again in the general election. The Colorado Supreme Court is due to rule on an appeal of a Denver judge’s ruling that although Trump did "engage in insurrection” in the Jan 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, Section 3 of the 14th Amendment’s ban on insurrectionists in office doesn’t apply to the presidency.

It’s possible one of the cases will end up at the U.S. Supreme Court, which has never ruled on Section 3. The provision was added to the Constitution after the Civil War to prevent former confederates from returning to their positions in government.

Dozens of lawsuits have been filed this year seeking to end Trump’s presidential candidacy. 

In other News, Trump's Brief is due today to the Supreme Court regarding his Immunity challenge. This has been some week for him, legally speaking.

 

3 hours ago, toolg said:

Does it bother you when Trump evokes the words of Hitler to curry favor among his supporters?

Bother him? It's exactly what he wants to hear.

Feels nice but I am concerned that the Colo action is just going to end up being a positive one for Trump.

5 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

Feels nice but I am concerned that the Colo action is just going to end up being a positive one for Trump.

Dr Philly is officially beyond parody...

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/colorado-hands-trump-political-gift-ballot-rcna130578

Here is a take on the topic

While I'm here...

 

 

 

The decision by the Colorado Supreme Court to disqualify Donald Trump from the state’s 2024 primary ballot under the 14th Amendment is a contentious one. While some argue that it was necessary due to his role in the January 6 insurrection, others view it as problematic. Here are a few reasons why this action might be considered unfavorable:

1. Disenfranchisement: By removing Trump from the ballot, it could disenfranchise voters who support him. Republican and unaffiliated voters may feel their voices are stifled if they cannot vote for a candidate they believe in.

2. Precedent: This ruling sets a precedent that could impact future elections. If a candidate can be disqualified based on past actions, it raises questions about the fairness of the electoral process.

3. Partisan Perception: Some argue that this decision appears partisan. The fact that the Colorado Secretary of State, a Democrat, has the authority to allow or disallow Trump’s name on the ballot may be seen as biased.

Ultimately, the debate centers around balancing accountability for actions with the democratic principle of allowing voters to choose from a full range of candidates.

2 minutes ago, mr_hunt said:

the democratic principle of allowing voters to choose from a full range of candidates.

The range including both treasonous criminals and non-criminals alike

Yes, but indictments don't equal criminal convictions, so this is playing right into his realm of reality. 

this clown is out of material.   

 

 

and of course he's trying to take credit for the stock market.   

 

 

ALWAYS PROJECTION LOL

EXCLUSIVE: A missing laptop could be key to prosecuting Trump. This rural Georgia county only recently admitted that it exists The device may contain evidence about the infamous breach of Coffee County’s election system.

4 hours ago, DrPhilly said:

Feels nice but I am concerned that the Colo action is just going to end up being a positive one for Trump.

They're creating a martyr.  The question "what next?" is what should be concerning.

3 hours ago, lynched1 said:

They're creating a martyr.  The question "what next?" is what should be concerning.

No it shouldn’t.  He is a POS that tried to overturn the will of the people.  He is a traitor to our country.  Absolute garbage.  The worst of the worst.  The antichrist.  Sad that dipshits like you don’t see it.  You, and people like you, are what is wrong with our country.  Sad.

What really surprises me is how many people I'm hearing say "Let the voters decide".  The voters did decide.  81M of them voted against Trump, to get rid of Trump.  Biden isn't that magnetic that he garnered the largest vote count of any presidential nominee in history because of his marketability; it was an historic rebuke of the worst President in US history.  They did decide, and Trump said "Find me 11,780 votes", and tried to send fake electors to every swing state to steal the election from the voters.

Take a vote right now of the Republicans in Congress and ask them directly -- do you accept the results of the 2020 election as valid and recognize Joe Biden as President?  See how many of them don't raise their hands.  Republicans have no interest in letting the voters decide, unless the electoral college falls their way.  If they don't win, it's not legitimate to them.  

1 hour ago, Alphagrand said:

What really surprises me is how many people I'm hearing say "Let the voters decide".  The voters did decide.  81M of them voted against Trump, to get rid of Trump.  Biden isn't that magnetic that he garnered the largest vote count of any presidential nominee in history because of his marketability; it was an historic rebuke of the worst President in US history.  They did decide, and Trump said "Find me 11,780 votes", and tried to send fake electors to every swing state to steal the election from the voters.

Take a vote right now of the Republicans in Congress and ask them directly -- do you accept the results of the 2020 election as valid and recognize Joe Biden as President?  See how many of them don't raise their hands.  Republicans have no interest in letting the voters decide, unless the electoral college falls their way.  If they don't win, it's not legitimate to them.  

As kids you played games and wound up with little turds like this. 'If I don't win I'll ruin the game for everyone.' It was pathetic then, and still is today.

35 minutes ago, Toastrel said:

As kids you played games and wound up with little turds like this. 'If I don't win I'll ruin the game for everyone.' It was pathetic then, and still is today.

Yep and sometimes they needed their arse kicked twice before they stopped. 

2 hours ago, Alphagrand said:

What really surprises me is how many people I'm hearing say "Let the voters decide".  The voters did decide.  81M of them voted against Trump, to get rid of Trump.  Biden isn't that magnetic that he garnered the largest vote count of any presidential nominee in history because of his marketability; it was an historic rebuke of the worst President in US history.  They did decide, and Trump said "Find me 11,780 votes", and tried to send fake electors to every swing state to steal the election from the voters.

Take a vote right now of the Republicans in Congress and ask them directly -- do you accept the results of the 2020 election as valid and recognize Joe Biden as President?  See how many of them don't raise their hands.  Republicans have no interest in letting the voters decide, unless the electoral college falls their way.  If they don't win, it's not legitimate to them.  

Sad thing is it is going to be a rematch of, now, the 2 worst presidents in history.  I'd say may the best man win but there really isn't a best so it becomes may the 2nd worst man win.

1 minute ago, GreenReaper said:

Sad thing is it is going to be a rematch of, now, the 2 worst presidents in history.  I'd say may the best man win but there really isn't a best so it becomes may the 2nd worst man win.

Easy choice. How do you like your US Constitution? Shredded or used for TP?

17 minutes ago, GreenReaper said:

Sad thing is it is going to be a rematch of, now, the 2 worst presidents in history.  I'd say may the best man win but there really isn't a best so it becomes may the 2nd worst man win.

I think it's getting to a point where Biden has to seriously consider getting out of the way.  Even though polling 11 months out is hardly an exact science, Biden is largely unpopular and doesn't energize Democratic voters at this point.  He will be 82 years old by Inauguration Day January 2025; that's just too damn old, regardless of whether I think he's done a good job or not. 

It's pretty ridiculous that someone who should be disqualified and imprisoned for corruption is running even or ahead of him in the polls.