March 1, 20241 yr No legitimate business purpose': Trump sued by Truth Social business partners Initially, Trump's stake was 78 million shares, valued at roughly $3.5 billion. UAV's stake in the company amounted to seven million shares valued at approximately $339 million. However, the lawsuit alleges Trump then engaged in a "dilution scheme" to increase the number of total shares to one billion, which they said had "no legitimate business purpose." UAV accused Trump of possibly scheming to distribute the additional shares among himself and his family, while significantly decreasing their stake in the company to less than 1%. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/no-legitimate-business-purpose-trump-sued-by-truth-social-business-partners/ar-BB1j7hc6?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=1c8ef852c1ab4d639f7add55ab1bc56a&ei=21
March 1, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, DaEagles4Life said: No legitimate business purpose': Trump sued by Truth Social business partners Initially, Trump's stake was 78 million shares, valued at roughly $3.5 billion. UAV's stake in the company amounted to seven million shares valued at approximately $339 million. However, the lawsuit alleges Trump then engaged in a "dilution scheme" to increase the number of total shares to one billion, which they said had "no legitimate business purpose." UAV accused Trump of possibly scheming to distribute the additional shares among himself and his family, while significantly decreasing their stake in the company to less than 1%. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/no-legitimate-business-purpose-trump-sued-by-truth-social-business-partners/ar-BB1j7hc6?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=1c8ef852c1ab4d639f7add55ab1bc56a&ei=21 Sounds like someone's a big fan of Zuckerberg and the social network
March 1, 20241 yr 4 hours ago, Next_Up said: I'm not clear. Do you mean "you are" hyphenated as "you're" like I am a piece of s*** or do you mean that I somehow possess a piece of s*** as you wrote. Just so we are clear 😉 Go see WGB. He'll help you out and cares more than I do ****head. 🤌
March 1, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, Mike030270 said: Lol Yeah I don't these guys are understanding their target demo at all. Instead of multi color high tops, they need to be selling a pair of snazzy all-white new balance walking shoes with a gold maga inscription.
March 1, 20241 yr 22 hours ago, Toastrel said: I hope they at least washed it first, or someone is gonna be bringing syphilis home.
March 2, 20241 yr 4 hours ago, we_gotta_believe said: Yeah I don't these guys are understanding their target demo at all. Instead of multi color high tops, they need to be selling a pair of snazzy all-white new balance walking shoes with a gold maga inscription. They’d make more money selling customized Harley’s and doing the financing. With your average MAGAt, there’s no way they’d give out a loan with less than 15% interest.
March 4, 20241 yr Republican Donald Trump's String of Gaffes Over Weekend Raises Eyebrows Ron Filipkowski, a Trump critic and the editor-in-chief of the independent news network MeidasTouch, posted a video on X, formerly Twitter, that compiled 32 incidents in both speeches in which, Filipkowski said, the Republican "mispronounced words, got confused, mixed up names, forgot names, and babbled insane nonsense." The video shows Trump appearing to slur his words and misspeak on several occasions, including by mispronouncing Venezuela and calling Argentina a "great guy."
March 4, 20241 yr LOL Ok Keith....or it was so bad that we saw a very rare 9-0 ruling for a reason. There is lots to hit him on but we can't get to the point where state legislates vote to remove candidates from the ballot cause both sides will start doing it and chaos will ensue.
March 4, 20241 yr 11 minutes ago, Diehardfan said: LOL Ok Keith....or it was so bad that we saw a very rare 9-0 ruling for a reason. There is lots to hit him on but we can't get to the point where state legislates vote to remove candidates from the ballot cause both sides will start doing it and chaos will ensue. olbermann = garbage
March 4, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, Dave Moss said: Put Keith Olbermann on the Supreme Court!!! Make him King
March 4, 20241 yr 3 hours ago, Diehardfan said: LOL Ok Keith....or it was so bad that we saw a very rare 9-0 ruling for a reason. There is lots to hit him on but we can't get to the point where state legislates vote to remove candidates from the ballot cause both sides will start doing it and chaos will ensue. What about when he runs for a 3rd term if he wins?
March 4, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, Dave Moss said: Put Keith Olbermann on the Supreme Court!!! I'm not a Walsh fan, but yeah. I get where he was going, but not his best day of posting.
Create an account or sign in to comment