May 8, 20241 yr 10 minutes ago, Procus said: Honey - Biden has long been known as an inept and corrupt politician. There is plenty of evidence of his corruption. I posted it. You don't understand what evidence is. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's not evidence. Guys, Procus just broke it wide open!!!
May 8, 20241 yr 14 minutes ago, Procus said: Honey - Biden has long been known as an inept and corrupt politician. There is plenty of evidence of his corruption. I posted it. You don't understand what evidence is. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's not evidence. opinions are not evidence. there's no financial records that indicate any level of corruption. even the "eyewitnesses" are unable to make a connection to Joe. nothing was ever discussed that remotely resembles a quid-pro-quo. even Comey has given up. you refuse to understand that nothing even approaches the threshold for considering an impeachment or any sort of charges. the government would be laughed out of court if they tried to bring a case with what you shared. you have nothing. get over it.
May 8, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: opinions are not evidence. there's no financial records that indicate any level of corruption. even the "eyewitnesses" are unable to make a connection to Joe. nothing was ever discussed that remotely resembles a quid-pro-quo. even Comey has given up. you refuse to understand that nothing even approaches the threshold for considering an impeachment or any sort of charges. the government would be laughed out of court if they tried to bring a case with what you shared. you have nothing. get over it. No way the "lawyer" understands such a profound statement lmao.
May 8, 20241 yr 19 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: opinions are not evidence. there's no financial records that indicate any level of corruption. even the "eyewitnesses" are unable to make a connection to Joe. nothing was ever discussed that remotely resembles a quid-pro-quo. even Comey has given up. you refuse to understand that nothing even approaches the threshold for considering an impeachment or any sort of charges. the government would be laughed out of court if they tried to bring a case with what you shared. you have nothing. get over it. Opinions by non-experts are covered under FRE 701 - look it up. I cited other evidence. Testimony is evidence. Witness recollections and statements constitute evidence. There is plenty of evidence. You may believe there is not enough evidence to convict in a court of law. Depends on the court and how the record is developed. But there is PLENTY of evidence. https://reason.com/2023/09/18/theres-plenty-of-evidence-of-corruption-around-biden/ There's Plenty of Evidence of Corruption Around Biden
May 8, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, Boogyman said: No way the "lawyer" understands such a profound statement lmao. Why don't you give us a dissertation on what the FRE allows into the record and does not allow into the record. We're all ears professor
May 8, 20241 yr Just now, Procus said: Opinions by non-experts are covered under FRE 701 - look it up. I cited other evidence. Testimony is evidence. Witness recollections and statements constitute evidence. There is plenty of evidence. You may believe there is not enough evidence to convict in a court of law. Depends on the court and how the record is developed. But there is PLENTY of evidence.
May 8, 20241 yr Just now, Procus said: Why don't you give us a dissertation on what the FRE allows into the record and does not allow into the record. We're all ears professor I don't need to do all that to know your feelings don't apply, Slappy.
May 8, 20241 yr 4 minutes ago, Procus said: Opinions by non-experts are covered under FRE 701 - look it up. I cited other evidence. Testimony is evidence. Witness recollections and statements constitute evidence. There is plenty of evidence. You may believe there is not enough evidence to convict in a court of law. Depends on the court and how the record is developed. But there is PLENTY of evidence. Uh, yeah I know that witnesses claiming things can be considered "evidence" But if you summed up the entirety of what has been "uncovered," it amounts to a few people who have worked with Hunter (many of whom have felt burned by Hunter over one deal or another, undercutting motives for testifying) having an opinion that Joe was somehow a beneficiary. That's it. There are no business agreements, bank records, or paper trails that lead to Joe receiving a capital benefit. There isn't even enough evidence to consider convening a grand jury. The only court that would even let a case proceed would need to have the judge and jury hand picked by the Trump-owned RNC.
May 8, 20241 yr 19 minutes ago, Boogyman said: No way the "lawyer" understands such a profound statement lmao. Procus is a "lawyer" in the same way that WV Mike is an "engineer".
May 9, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, we_gotta_believe said: Procus is a "lawyer" in the same way that WV Mike is an "engineer". Remember that time it was impossible to become a millionaire over the course of a 50 year career only making 80k?
May 9, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, Paul852 said: Remember that time it was impossible to become a millionaire over the course of a 50 year career only making 80k? Congress
May 9, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, Procus said: But there is PLENTY of evidence. You clearly do not understand the meaning of that word.
May 9, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, Paul852 said: You clearly do not understand the meaning of that word. Well then educate all of us as to what constitutes evidence. Go for it Paul!
May 9, 20241 yr 38 minutes ago, Procus said: Well then educate all of us as to what constitutes evidence. Go for it Paul! You want me to repeat what has already gone through one ear and out the other?
May 9, 20241 yr 15 minutes ago, Paul852 said: You want me to repeat what has already gone through one ear and out the other? Whatever floats your boat - or, you can simply admit that you really don't know what the word evidence means
May 9, 20241 yr 8 minutes ago, Procus said: Whatever floats your boat - or, you can simply admit that you really don't know what the word evidence means Why don't you post another Fox New article?
May 9, 20241 yr Maybe they got the wrong network..... Its a whole different court case listening to the big three networks
May 9, 20241 yr 3 hours ago, Procus said: Opinions by non-experts are covered under FRE 701 - look it up. I cited other evidence. Testimony is evidence. Witness recollections and statements constitute evidence. There is plenty of evidence. You may believe there is not enough evidence to convict in a court of law. Depends on the court and how the record is developed. But there is PLENTY of evidence. https://reason.com/2023/09/18/theres-plenty-of-evidence-of-corruption-around-biden/ There's Plenty of Evidence of Corruption Around Biden
May 9, 20241 yr 34 minutes ago, Paul852 said: Why don't you post another Fox New article? Why don't you just tell us what evidence is since you claim to know
May 9, 20241 yr You would think the combination of all this evidence and there being plenty of people who want to take down Joe Biden that he’d have 90+ indictments right now so ALL this evidence could be presented. How many indictments are there against Joe Biden?
May 9, 20241 yr 11 hours ago, Procus said: Why don't you just tell us what evidence is since you claim to know
May 9, 20241 yr 11 hours ago, Procus said: Why don't you just tell us what evidence is since you claim to know evidence is something that actually leads to an indictment and hopefully a conviction. how's all that evidence coming along? did i miss a batch of indictments against the bidens? you have any pics or video of biden being booked and processed? you find any more of hunter's deek pics that you & MTG are so obsessed over ? were all of those embarrassing moments for comer & jordan just a big SNL skit? c'mon oh enlightened one, educate us all. this should be good.
Create an account or sign in to comment