July 31, 20241 yr 8 minutes ago, Paul852 said: Harris. Next question. Could you please elaborate what policies of hers are better for the country and what you have seen from her that leads you to believe she will oversee a competent administration.
July 31, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, Procus said: Could you please elaborate what policies of hers are better for the country and what you have seen from her that leads you to believe she will oversee a competent administration. You listen to her rally?
July 31, 20241 yr Just now, Paul852 said: You listen to her rally? I did not. What did she say specifically that encouraged you?
July 31, 20241 yr Just now, Procus said: I did not. What did she say specifically that encouraged you? Anti project 2025, pro middle class, pro women's rights, pro child/school programs. Pretty much everything the Republican party isn't. Oh, and also she's not Donald Trump. But you already knew that part.
July 31, 20241 yr 8 minutes ago, Paul852 said: Anti project 2025, pro middle class, pro women's rights, pro child/school programs. Pretty much everything the Republican party isn't. Oh, and also she's not Donald Trump. But you already knew that part. That's pretty generalized stuff. I'm surprised as a voting taxpayer you aren't curious what the details are behind that. And per the prior question, what is it about her that makes you believe she will oversee a competent administration?
July 31, 20241 yr Just now, Procus said: That's pretty generalized stuff. I'm surprised as a voting taxpayer you aren't curious what the details are behind that. And per the prior question, what is it about her that makes you believe she will oversee a competent administration? You are not a serious person.
July 31, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, Procus said: That's pretty generalized stuff. I'm surprised as a voting taxpayer you aren't curious what the details are behind that. And per the prior question, what is it about her that makes you believe she will oversee a competent administration?
July 31, 20241 yr 28 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: c'mon diaper donnie...tell us why. That's right...keep expanding that pool of voters, Don.
July 31, 20241 yr 12 hours ago, Procus said: That's pretty generalized stuff. I'm surprised as a voting taxpayer you aren't curious what the details are behind that. And per the prior question, what is it about her that makes you believe she will oversee a competent administration? Kamala did not talk about cognitive tests, the "real stories" of Hannibal Lecter, nuking hurricanes, raking forests, drinking bleach or putting the light on the lungs, Revolutionary War airports, the need of legal immunity for committing felonies, or anything like that. So she is already better than the opposition.
July 31, 20241 yr 12 hours ago, Procus said: I did not. What did she say specifically that encouraged you? go do your own research, ya lazy F. or, just keep making yourself look like the pile of hot garbage you are. the decision is yours. after-all, this is america. freedom of choice etc etc.
July 31, 20241 yr 13 hours ago, Procus said: That post epitomizes what is happening today in politics. Demonize the opponent. Here's a newsflash - most of those people who rise to the top in the political arena are scumbags and sharks. You can say plenty of bad things about both Trump and Harris. Ask yourself this - whose policies are better for the country and who is more likely to oversee a competent administration? Who is more likely to leave office when their term is up?
July 31, 20241 yr 6 minutes ago, Gannan said: Who is more likely to leave office when their term is up? He said "who's more likely to oversee a competent administration"? Good god. Half of Trump's former administration have publicly spoken AGAINST him, and the other half are indicted for various grifts. These weirdos act like we can't read news reports.
July 31, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, Lloyd said: He said "who's more likely to oversee a competent administration"? Good god. Half of Trump's former administration have publicly spoken AGAINST him, and the other half are indicted for various grifts. These weirdos act like we can't read news reports. I'm not sure her record of keeping folks in her staff is all that great, if you can read the news reports.
July 31, 20241 yr 5 minutes ago, GreenReaper said: I'm not sure her record of keeping folks in her staff is all that great, if you can read the news reports. Trump's presidency saw an 85% turnover rate. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/and-then-there-were-ten-with-85-turnover-across-president-trumps-a-team-who-remains/
July 31, 20241 yr 14 hours ago, Procus said: Could you please elaborate what policies of hers are better for the country and what you have seen from her that leads you to believe she will oversee a competent administration. I think a lot of it is in the tremendous way she took charge of the border crisis when called upon. Also, the fact that she is now trying to make people believe her new stance on fracking, the border, mandatory gun buy back programs, etc. She's done a full 180 on things she used to feel strong about and people are eating it up. She should also be praised for how well she was able to cover up Biden's actual mental state over the last 3.5 years, she was very convincing relaying his ability to do the job and energy and vigor in which he did it. One point of concern could be that she stated how she couldn't even keep up with Biden's energy, and most people see how energetic the guy is. I don't know how you vote for someone with less energy and vigor than Joe but that's what we'll be asked to do.
July 31, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, SPIDER-MAN said: Trump's presidency saw an 85% turnover rate. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/and-then-there-were-ten-with-85-turnover-across-president-trumps-a-team-who-remains/ Yeah, so they both suck with people, that's been established already.
July 31, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, GreenReaper said: Yeah, so they both suck with people, that's been established already. but, but, kamala
July 31, 20241 yr 17 minutes ago, GreenReaper said: I'm not sure her record of keeping folks in her staff is all that great, if you can read the news reports. Has she ever had any of her former staff members call her "a threat to democracy", "unfit to be president", "a person who admires autocrats and murderous dictators", and "has nothing but contempt for our democratic institutions, our Constitution, and the rule of law.” or that if she were elected it would be "the end of democracy"?
July 31, 20241 yr 12 minutes ago, GreenReaper said: Yeah, so they both suck with people, that's been established already. You know what else has been established? Trump's criminal record and history of rape. Very. Well. Established.
July 31, 20241 yr 4 hours ago, mr_hunt said: c'mon diaper donnie...tell us why. "We can't believe we got so lucky". Would Russia REALLY say that? Oh, wait .....
July 31, 20241 yr 23 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: Has she ever had any of her former staff members call her "a threat to democracy", "unfit to be president", "a person who admires autocrats and murderous dictators", and "has nothing but contempt for our democratic institutions, our Constitution, and the rule of law.” or that if she were elected it would be "the end of democracy"? Also, did she encourage her supporters to hang any of her employees? Asking for no reason.
July 31, 20241 yr 14 minutes ago, vikas83 said: Also, did she encourage her supporters to hang any of her employees? Asking for no reason. well, she did start grifting the country with non-stop with BS merchandise. oh wait. no she didn't.
July 31, 20241 yr 8 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said: well, she did start grifting the country with non-stop with BS merchandise. oh wait. no she didn't. Surely she called veterans suckers and losers because they sacrificed for their country when "there was nothing in it for them"? No? Damn, I gotta google this Harris broad.
Create an account or sign in to comment