time2rock Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 For the love of God ... BRING UP HOWARD and split bulk of carries between he and Gainwell (with a little Scott sprinkled in). Seems like a no brainer strategy ... but not with this damn coaching staff. 7
LacesOut Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 13 minutes ago, time2rock said: For the love of God ... BRING UP HOWARD and split bulk of carries between he and Gainwell (with a little Scott sprinkled in). Seems like a no brainer strategy ... but not with this damn coaching staff. Stop being rational and posting quality football stuff!! Now the Coaches have a real reason to never run the ball, since their #1 RB is not in the lineup. Ugh. 1 2
eggs Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 18 minutes ago, time2rock said: For the love of God ... BRING UP HOWARD and split bulk of carries between he and Gainwell (with a little Scott sprinkled in). Seems like a no brainer strategy ... but not with this damn coaching staff. Yes
Penn7980 Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 18 minutes ago, time2rock said: For the love of God ... BRING UP HOWARD and split bulk of carries between he and Gainwell (with a little Scott sprinkled in). Seems like a no brainer strategy ... but not with this damn coaching staff. Howard is on the PS protection list for the Lions game. May very well be called up. There is no other better option on the roster right now.
Hawkeye Posted October 29, 2021 Author Posted October 29, 2021 2 hours ago, time2rock said: For the love of God ... BRING UP HOWARD and split bulk of carries between he and Gainwell (with a little Scott sprinkled in). Seems like a no brainer strategy ... but not with this damn coaching staff. It really is baffling. IMO Howard should have been active for much of the season already. If they had him to run between the tackles, perhaps they wouldn't drop into the shotgun from the one inch line. 2
Hawkeye Posted October 29, 2021 Author Posted October 29, 2021 Maybe they actually came to their senses. 3
20dawk4life Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 Still gonna have the same amount of touches
time2rock Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 23 minutes ago, Hawkeye said: It really is baffling. IMO Howard should have been active for much of the season already. If they had him to run between the tackles, perhaps they wouldn't drop into the shotgun from the one inch line. Indeed. They have it reversed … Howard should have been on the active roster and Scott on the practice squad. 1
birdman#12 Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 If Sirianni was what he was advertised as, Sanders, Gainwell, Howard and Scott should have had plenty of work to go around. When he put Howard on the PS and only went with 3 RBs, I was like WTF? 1
nipples Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 Howard is cooked. Don’t know why anyone is banging the table for him. They’d be just as well off to grab a back off the street or some a guy from someone else’s PS. 2
Hawkeye Posted October 29, 2021 Author Posted October 29, 2021 1 hour ago, time2rock said: Indeed. They have it reversed … Howard should have been on the active roster and Scott on the practice squad. I sort of forgot about Howard until recently. A good article by Ruben Frank lays out the case for rolling with him for at least a while. Yes, he was hurt a couple of years ago but he's supposedly healthy now and ready to go. https://www.nbcsports.com/philadelphia/eagles/miles-sanders-out-eagles-nick-sirianni-must-turn-jordan-howard 1
Bwestbrook36 Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 3 hours ago, time2rock said: For the love of God ... BRING UP HOWARD and split bulk of carries between he and Gainwell (with a little Scott sprinkled in). Seems like a no brainer strategy ... but not with this damn coaching staff. If they didn't want to give miles carries they sure as hell aren't going to give Howard any
Bwestbrook36 Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 1 hour ago, time2rock said: Indeed. They have it reversed … Howard should have been on the active roster and Scott on the practice squad. You know what's coming with Howard though. He offers zero versatility
Portyansky Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 4 hours ago, time2rock said: For the love of God ... BRING UP HOWARD and split bulk of carries between he and Gainwell (with a little Scott sprinkled in). Seems like a no brainer strategy ... but not with this damn coaching staff. What is this carries you speak of? 1
flyerdog Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 2 hours ago, Hawkeye said: It really is baffling. IMO Howard should have been active for much of the season already. If they had him to run between the tackles, perhaps they wouldn't drop into the shotgun from the one inch line. but that requires that you ACTUALLY run the ball...
UK_EaglesFan89 Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 38 minutes ago, Portyansky said: Can't even trade him now. Absolute joke. The lack of structure and direction within this organisation right now is frightening.
EagleMatt Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 Who? Only active rb on this roster is Hurtz 1
RememberTheKoy Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 Every year Sanders gets limited touches and every year he gets injured. He's a playmaker but would be wise for the Eagles to try to trade him for something this offseason.
Big___Al Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 OK, I know this is common, but I have a problem with it: "The #Eagles are placing RB Miles Sanders (ankle) on Injured Reserve, source said. Out 3 games, but should be back soon upon eligibility." What does it mean, "ankle??" He lost an ankle... broke an ankle... twisted an ankle... suffered a snake bite on his ankle??? How 'bout a little more info?
VaBeach_Eagle Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 So in other words, we won't lose any production from him. He'll still get the same amount of carries... 2
EagleMatt Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 26 minutes ago, Big___Al said: OK, I know this is common, but I have a problem with it: "The #Eagles are placing RB Miles Sanders (ankle) on Injured Reserve, source said. Out 3 games, but should be back soon upon eligibility." What does it mean, "ankle??" He lost an ankle... broke an ankle... twisted an ankle... suffered a snake bite on his ankle??? How 'bout a little more info? Hurt due to ankle something something. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now