Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The Eagles Message Board

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

***Official*** E!A!G!L!E!S! EAGLES! Ongoing PBP Thread

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, downundermike said:

Yes, we were.

In CVON we often don’t see eye to eye but in TATE we toe the same line in regards to the cap. You understand the numbers and nuances as well. 

  • Replies 8.3k
  • Views 300.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

11 minutes ago, paco said:

In CVON we often don’t see eye to eye but in TATE we toe the same line in regards to the cap. You understand the numbers and nuances as well. 

CVON and seeing eye to eye are impossible

6 minutes ago, downundermike said:

CVON and seeing eye to eye are impossible

No, your impossible! *
 

 

*Grammar modified for CVONism

3 minutes ago, paco said:

No, your impossible! *
 

 

*Grammar modified for CVONism

 You're modification is approved

 

Question, and I'll use Bradberry as my example:  so for the next five seasons, we're on the hook to Bradberry for $1,243,000 per season while we're only getting him on the field for one. 

How would the cap hits on those future years work if we were to extend Bradberry on this deal or if we were to offer him a new contract in the offseason?   I assume that if we were to extend him on this deal, we would just simply factor in those future cap hits into the calculations. 

But if we were to offer him a new contract, would there be in effect a scenario where a player is impacting our cap twice?  Would we be paying him the voidable years on this deal, while also paying him separately on his new deal? 
 

Just watch and smile 

 

2 minutes ago, OCEaglefan said:

Just watch and smile 

 

Plus the 88 yarder from Vick to open the Monday Night Massacre. 

Of all of Chip’s sins. That was the worst 

On 5/20/2022 at 10:33 AM, hukdonfoniks said:

Question, and I'll use Bradberry as my example:  so for the next five seasons, we're on the hook to Bradberry for $1,243,000 per season while we're only getting him on the field for one. 

How would the cap hits on those future years work if we were to extend Bradberry on this deal or if we were to offer him a new contract in the offseason?   I assume that if we were to extend him on this deal, we would just simply factor in those future cap hits into the calculations. 

But if we were to offer him a new contract, would there be in effect a scenario where a player is impacting our cap twice?  Would we be paying him the voidable years on this deal, while also paying him separately on his new deal? 
 

If they extend him they stay spread out.  They only roll up when the contract ends. 

smRYjCr.jpg

RhT6W61.jpg

oMzKDp8.jpg

Number of super bowls:

OBJ - 1

Tua - 0 

 

congrats @Mat ! 

1 minute ago, BFit said:

 

congrats @Mat ! 

I had an Uber driver over the weekend who was born in Ghana - super friendly guy.  Just a random observation.  

‘’I had an Uber driver from Ghana’’ is the new ‘’I have a black friend….’’.

Wait a second... why isn't this bigger news (here)

 

Did he get married or just propose?  Either way, pretty cool

13 hours ago, BFit said:

 

congrats @Mat ! 

I have no idea what this means but I approve!

3 minutes ago, Mat said:

I have no idea what this means but I approve!

Fletcher Cox is coming to your country to bang your mom. 

4 minutes ago, paco said:

Fletcher Cox is coming to your country to bang your mom. 

My mom or my girlfriend? I think Delonte West was the mother f'er before crack

1 minute ago, Mat said:

My mom or my girlfriend? I think Delonte West was the mother f'er before crack

Well, as a kiwi, what’s the difference?

20 minutes ago, paco said:

Well, as a kiwi, what’s the difference?

Let me go ask her, she is in the paddock out back

ESPN+ Who had the best offseason 

phi.png&h=110&w=110

2. Philadelphia Eagles

What went right: Blessed with cap space and draft assets after trading Carson Wentz and moving down in the 2021 draft, general manager Howie Roseman showed off this offseason. The Eagles signed star edge rusher Haason Reddickto a three-year, $45 million contract, brought back Derek Barnett on a reasonable deal and convinced Fletcher Cox to take a pay cut. When the Giants were unable to find a trade partner for James Bradberry, Philadelphia swooped and signed the talented cornerback to a one-year, $7.3 million deal, giving the team its best duo at cornerback on paper since the days of the Dream Team. Veterans Kyzir White and Anthony Harrisare in the building on modest one-year deals.

That would be enough to have a great time, but the Eagles extracted a 2023 first-rounder from the Saints for moving down from No. 19 to No. 101 in the 2022 draft, a pick that could land higher than most people expect if the Saints crater post-Sean Payton. On draft day, they moved up ahead of the Ravens to draft Jordan Davis, then used their other first-round pick to trade for Titans superstar A.J. Brown, giving them a dynamic one-two receiving punch between Brown and DeVonta Smith. They even landed draft faller Nakobe Dean in the third round, which was good value even given concerns about Dean's medical report.

As it stands, the Eagles addressed significant weaknesses at cornerback and receiver. They pushed one of their first-round picks into the future and opened up the possibility of a more valuable first-rounder, giving them more flexibility if they want to do something aggressive at quarterback next offseason. Jason Kelce came back for another year. Outside of not using their top picks to land a quarterback such as Russell Wilson, it's difficult to poke many holes in what they did this offseason.

What went wrong: Getting Harris to come back on a one-year, $2.5 million deal was nice, but the Eagles are still thin at safety. I don't think there's much there behind Dallas Goedert, who has played one complete season in four years as a pro. There's just not much to dislike here.

What they could have done differently:Trading for Brown has some risk. He has already undergone double knee surgery, wasn't playing a full complement of snaps in Tennessee and will be making nearly $25 million per season over the next few years after you account for both his new deal with the Eagles (which comes in just over $19.1 million per year over the next three seasons) and the surplus value of the first-round pick the Eagles sent to Tennessee.

The Titans, in a messier cap situation, preferred to trade Brown and use the draft pick to select Treylon Burks, who profiled similarly to Brown before the draft. The Eagles haven't exactly covered themselves in glory drafting wide receivers over the past decade, but we might look back and prefer Tennessee's side of this challenge trade.

What's next: There's room to add another safety to compete for starting work in Philadelphia. Jaquiski Tartt is still unsigned after his ignominious drop in the NFC Championship Game, but he was a solid safety when healthy for the 49ers. Safeties should also pop up during training camp, and the Eagles should be actively pursuing one to compete with Harris and K'Von Wallace.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.