Jump to content

Missing Titanic tourist submersible


Aspiritfall
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

That has to be terrifying... Submersible lost contact about 32 hours ago and has about 92 hours of oxygen... Even if it's floating on the surface they are still bolted inside... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazed this can still happen and amazed a billionaire doesn't just want to own a yacht and Fer hookers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

Amazed this can still happen and amazed a billionaire doesn't just want to own a yacht and Fer hookers.

Yeah it's crazy... Pretty much sounds like if they're not floating on the ocean surface they're as good as gone... Not looking good for them right now 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched a documentary where a group of people set out on a 3 hour tour in the Pacific and went missing for years, but it turned out that they wound up living a quite comfortable life on a deserted tropical island until they were found, so I'm still holding out hope.

  • Haha 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

I watched a documentary where a group of people set out on a 3 hour tour in the Pacific and went missing for years, but it turned out that they wound up living a quite comfortable life on a deserted tropical island until they were found, so I'm still holding out hope.

Mary Ann was hotter than Ginger 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aspiritfall said:

 

That has to be terrifying... Submersible lost contact about 32 hours ago and has about 92 hours of oxygen... Even if it's floating on the surface they are still bolted inside... 

It if is floating and they don't have an emergency EPIRB then we are entering Darwin Award territory

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

I watched a documentary where a group of people set out on a 3 hour tour in the Pacific and went missing for years, but it turned out that they wound up living a quite comfortable life on a deserted tropical island until they were found, so I'm still holding out hope.

I got to see that island where the intro for the show was filmed while in the Bahamas 2 weeks ago. You can see it when heading from Nassau Paradise Island on the way to Blue Lagoon Island. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to what I just heard, they do have several ways to communicate when on the surface. They also have a ton of way to surface in an emergency. These things are supposedly plagued with issues. Random dudes build them and they are jury rigged AF. The one lost is actually controlled with an old gaming controller.  The reporter doing the report was on the one of their five day trips, he stayed on the surface ship. He said the thing was supposed to dive five days in a row but they only made one because of malfunctions. They got lost on the one dive they did make and never found the titanic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully they'll be found alive, but my first thoughts about the situation were that there was an implosion and the sub is likely the size of a crushed beer can. Hopefully I'm wrong on that, but that's what I'm thinking has happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I’m not getting in that rickety thing. 

And they have to pay $200,000 to experience that horror trap? No thanks. People have way too much money to spend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Did they order the submersible on wish.com?

I love seeing the memes of idiots who ordered crap off that site :roll: 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the tech and engineering behind it is ok, I don't necessarily see a major problem with using a game controller as a primary input. The issue I'd see at the outset is that it suggests (based on the general amateurish approach that looks like was taken here) that no mechanical backup of any sort was available. I don't want to claim to be an expert here, but if there was only one way to control the ship - regardless of whether that was via some game controller or not - that was by nature entirely electronic, you've got a helluva single point of failure there.

I would expect some kind of "oh crap" option is available so that if control is lost some sort of mechanical ballast could raise the ship in a pinch. so even if the power goes out, the emergency lever gets the ship to the surface (barring something really dumb like grounding the ship or getting it stuck on something. there's no engineering around utter stupidity at that depth.)

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

If the tech and engineering behind it is ok, I don't necessarily see a major problem with using a game controller as a primary input. The issue I'd see at the outset is that it suggests (based on the general amateurish approach that looks like was taken here) that no mechanical backup of any sort was available. I don't want to claim to be an expert here, but if there was only one way to control the ship - regardless of whether that was via some game controller or not - that was by nature entirely electronic, you've got a helluva single point of failure there.

I would expect some kind of "oh crap" option is available so that if control is lost some sort of mechanical ballast could raise the ship in a pinch. so even if the power goes out, the emergency lever gets the ship to the surface (barring something really dumb like grounding the ship or getting it stuck on something. there's no engineering around utter stupidity at that depth.)

Those were notorious for sticking. The buttons and the analogue sticks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mike030270 said:

Those were notorious for sticking. The buttons and the analogue sticks

I'm sure they had one of these bad boys as a backup for player 2

Mad Catz confirms PS3 3.50 disables some of its controllers - so much for  being officially licensed | GamesRadar+

  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Titanic still adding to its body count over 100 years later is pretty impressive.

  • Haha 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

If the tech and engineering behind it is ok, I don't necessarily see a major problem with using a game controller as a primary input. The issue I'd see at the outset is that it suggests (based on the general amateurish approach that looks like was taken here) that no mechanical backup of any sort was available. I don't want to claim to be an expert here, but if there was only one way to control the ship - regardless of whether that was via some game controller or not - that was by nature entirely electronic, you've got a helluva single point of failure there.

I would expect some kind of "oh crap" option is available so that if control is lost some sort of mechanical ballast could raise the ship in a pinch. so even if the power goes out, the emergency lever gets the ship to the surface (barring something really dumb like grounding the ship or getting it stuck on something. there's no engineering around utter stupidity at that depth.)

The range of motion for the gamepad sticks could also be a concern. Not sure what kind of fine controls are needed for a submersible like this, but I'd assume dual full-sized joysticks would allow for more granular input, but based how limited cabin space was inside that thing, I supposed everything had to be as compact as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

If the tech and engineering behind it is ok, I don't necessarily see a major problem with using a game controller as a primary input. The issue I'd see at the outset is that it suggests (based on the general amateurish approach that looks like was taken here) that no mechanical backup of any sort was available.

I'm sure they have a second controller brand new in box to plug in.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently, the controls are limited to up and down, which seems insane to me. Make a submersible that can't move laterally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Toastrel said:

Apparently, the controls are limited to up and down, which seems insane to me. Make a submersible that can't move laterally.

There's gotta be some sort of rudder for yaw also, right? ...right? :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a tendency when these things go wrong to suggest that it was a half assed company taking risks (like that tweet saying "these are deeply unserious people"), to be clear these guys built a vehicle that can reach 4000 metres depth, there are only a handful of such vehicles in the world, and I mean that literally there are about 5, so if they are snagged down there, they likely need a miracle.

You can't make something that works at that kind of depth without having deep engineering knowledge. People point at the controller, but Reaper drones use basically a very sophisticated flight sim rig for controls, those people aren't stuck down there because they're using a Logitech PC pad.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

There's gotta be some sort of rudder for yaw also, right? ...right? :huh:

There is, it can manoeuver in 4 directions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

The Coast Guard said there was one pilot and four "mission specialists” aboard. "Mission specialists” are people who pay to come along on OceanGate’s expeditions. They take turns operating sonar equipment and performing other tasks in the five-person submersible.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...