Jump to content

Featured Replies

All of them are FBI agents. Except the ones who went to prison...the ones Trump pardoned and called patriots...like the camp Aushwitz guy (who Procus seems to have no issue with despite being Jewish). And those people only committed crimes because the FBI agent (pictured above) forced them to!

Do I have the Trumptard's ridiculous narrative on this correct?

  • Replies 13k
  • Views 229.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

5 minutes ago, Gannan said:

All of them are FBI agents. Except the ones who went to prison...the ones Trump pardoned and called patriots...like the camp Aushwitz guy (who Procus seems to have no issue with despite being Jewish). And those people only committed crimes because the FBI agent (pictured above) forced them to!

Do I have the Trumptard's ridiculous narrative on this correct?

Totally.

They only insurrected because plainclothes FBI agents were standing behind MPD officers without proper masks for riot control.

I figure if I transition. LOL.

sorry if already posted

G1zb4afXcAA2uME?format=jpg&name=900x900

This may explain why he wants to win one..

G10N-y2WIAE78w-?format=jpg&name=small

G1z051Yb0AMmF15?format=jpg&name=small

4 hours ago, Diehardfan said:

Right so nothing he does will be good only bad in the TDS eyes so this is a tribal thing all around.

His bad has outweighed his good on a crazy magnitude

On 9/26/2025 at 9:09 PM, Mike030270 said:

I miss the old board when everything football related wasn't in that blog thread. It's not even a blog thread anymore. I've tried to revive ATNFL subforum with no success but I digress

There arent nearly the same amount of posters anymore. We can realistically probably consolidate in to much fewer subsections although theres no real need to do so. Its kinda pointless to post in a bunch of different areas.

17 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

His bad has outweighed his good on a crazy magnitude

Ok, that's fine. But there is tribalism from people who feel the way you do and those of us on the other. People can't point fingers about us not coming over to the middle when your side isn't budging either, and I'm not asking anyone to. I've pointed out times where I've disagreed with him, but I view the left as being just as crazy and just as much of a threat to our country.

Things are so bad a Romney type isn't going to fix it. We need a bulldozer one way or another to get through the media bias and to stand up to the swamp in the GOP. I view them the same way I do the Utah GOP full of corruption only out for special interests. You will not agree. I'm not asking you two, but that is where we are. Trump is a tool albeit an imperfect one and in more ways than one.

At this point outside of something major happening I'm not going to be around here much. I look forward to talking about stuff I agree with you on vs fighting in here.

9 hours ago, Diehardfan said:

Quite simply put you are an expat who is wrong about everything yet claims to be right. My side won for a reason. Every swing state. Go cry more. This lawlessness is going to stop though and there isn't crap you can do about it.

I'll tell you what though I will take a step away from here for a while though because talking to crazy TDS folks does get old.

I like the guy. He's intelligent, well spoken, and overall, a gentleman.

That being said, he also lacks self awareness as so many on the left do. They don't realize how extreme their political positions are and often misinterpret themselves to be centrists - which they clearly are not.

6 minutes ago, Procus said:

I like the guy. He's intelligent, well spoken, and overall, a gentleman.

That being said, he also lacks self awareness as so many on the left do. They don't realize how extreme their political positions are and often misinterpret themselves to be centrists - which they clearly are not.

I was told Doc was a lady. Either way likeable like you said.

IMG_2755.jpeg

3 hours ago, Procus said:

I like the guy. He's intelligent, well spoken, and overall, a gentleman.

That being said, he also lacks self awareness as so many on the left do. They don't realize how extreme their political positions are and often misinterpret themselves to be centrists - which they clearly are not.

Yeah well I’m not on the left. I’ve voted more Repub than Dem over the years. I’m classic 100% right leaning centrist with a couple views that align left, e.g. abortion rights. I’d say it is you and the rest of MAGA that lack the awareness out there on the tip of the horseshoe.

Please do provide two or three examples of where my positions are extreme. I won't be holding my breath.

A columnist for a leading conservative news website explicitly called for "violence” and "blood in the streets” on Friday.

Geoffrey Ingersoll, editor-at-large of the Daily Caller, made his bloodthirsty demand in a lengthy column published on the site under the headline, "Enough Is Enough… I Choose VIOLENCE!” It spoke about striking a "fat [B]lack woman,” and using ex-convicts to inflict pain.

The column in the Caller, which was founded by Tucker Carlson and is now part-owned by Donald Trump Jr.’s business partner Omeed Malik, was also promoted to subscribers of its "State of the Day” newsletter.

Ingersoll’s call for violence came after Donald Trump and JD Vance claimed that it was the "radical left” that was responsible for growing political violence—a claim greeted with skepticism but which they have doubled down on.

Ingersoll, formerly editor-in-chief of the site and, like Vance, a one-time Marine public affairs writer, made clear that he was calling for "drubbings,” "cudgels,” and "extra-legal acts of violence”—even though the site later appended an editor’s note claiming his essay referred to "hypothetical instances of self-defense.”

But Ingersoll in fact wrote, "Today, I choose violence. Literally. I know calls for violence are generally frowned upon. The issue is… I simply don’t care."

In case readers were in doubt, it went on to say, "Is this a call for violence? Yes. Explicitly it is,” before suggesting that "conservatives” could not rely on police or prosecutors so should "bring security with you that’s dying to dole out drubbings.”

"So some activist takes the sign next to your table at a public debate…?” he wrote. "She gets instantly clotheslined. I don’t care if police are present. Do it anyway. In fact, be wildly disproportionate.”

@Diehardfan Here is the editor-at-large from a site you often quote specifically calling for violence. You can take your "this is all on the left" BS and shove it up your ass.

Screenshot 2025-09-28 at 10.09.22.png

@Diehardfan From Patel's mouth himself on Fox News website

"Agents were sent into a crowd control mission after the riot was declared by Metro Police – something that goes against FBI standards," Patel told Fox News Digital. "This was the failure of a corrupt leadership that lied to Congress and to the American people about what really happened."

See sheet post sheet - Just another example in a long litany of debunked sheet that you post in here almost daily. You should probably play 18 after the game today or go for a very long hike.

3 hours ago, DrPhilly said:

@Diehardfan Here is the editor-at-large from a site you often quote specifically calling for violence. You can take your "this is all on the left" BS and shove it up your ass.

All? No. Most? Absolutely. But way to quote a random website.

3 hours ago, DrPhilly said:

Screenshot 2025-09-28 at 10.09.22.png

@Diehardfan From Patel's mouth himself on Fox News website

See sheet post sheet - Just another example in a long litany of debunked sheet that you post in here almost daily. You should probably play 18 after the game today or go for a very long hike.

You people had 18 pages of cat eating stories in the Kirk thread so shove it up your ass. Also, you may want to hold off spiking the football considering Wray was lying under oath. Just like the Russia hoax it was debunked in stages while many here claimed it was true. And speaking of Russia you all love playing that Jan 6th card while ignoring the massive collusion that was the Russia hoax to subvert the will of the people after an election.

12 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

All? No. Most? Absolutely. But way to quote a random website.

It is all over mate and is a published article on the Daily Caller. You can find it all over the place like Newsweek, New York Times, Politico, UK sites, etc.

Here is the link to the Daily Caller https://dailycaller.com/2025/09/26/ingersoll-enough-choose-violence-police-crime-crackdown/

btw - You know that site now don't you? Tucker Carlson founded it. This guy is an editor. You quote them in here. They aren't as big as Breitbart but they are pretty much as big as anyone else in non Fox media on the right.

11 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

You people had 18 pages of cat eating stories in the Kirk thread so shove it up your ass. Also, you may want to hold off spiking the football considering Wray was lying under oath. Just like the Russia hoax it was debunked in stages while many here claimed it was true. And speaking of Russia you all love playing that Jan 6th card while ignoring the massive collusion that was the Russia hoax to subvert the will of the people after an election.

Meh, you and Trump were both running your mouths ala "find sheet post sheet" and then get debunked for about the 1000th time. The agents were not "embedded" as you tried to assert. I get to give you the sheet you deserve in here and yes the football is spiked. Trump is the piece of total putrid sheet that he is and nothing will ever change that. No POTUS in history would be as reckless as to shovel out this kind of pure sheet. When even his lackey Patel has to correct him it is worse than normal.

It is all over mate and is a published article on the Daily Caller. You can find it all over the place like Newsweek, New York Times, Politico, UK sites, etc.

1 minute ago, DrPhilly said:

Here is the link to the Daily Caller https://dailycaller.com/2025/09/26/ingersoll-enough-choose-violence-police-crime-crackdown/

btw - You know that site now don't you? Tucker Carlson founded it. This guy is an editor. You quote them in here. They aren't as big as Breitbart but they are pretty much as big as anyone else in non Fox media on the right.

I never heard of that author before but he was speaking about retaliatory violence in self defense.

"A fat black lady assaults your on-camera talent? Book the kind of security that has no qualms hospitalizing her and people like her."

Sheet post from ya doc.

17 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

You people

This is the root cause of your rotten position. It is all we vs. them to you. I didn't push anything out in the Kirk thread that would warrant any sheet from you yet you attack me anyway.

You have a problem my friend. Wake up and realize it isn't a binary situation with a "good" and an "evil" group on two sides. You are the epitome of what is wrong right now in the country. It is a disease. You ARE the disease. Own it.

1 minute ago, DrPhilly said:

Meh, you and Trump were both running your mouths ala "find sheet post sheet" and then get debunked for about the 1000th time. The agents were not "embedded" as you tried to assert. I get to give you the sheet you deserve in here and yes the football is spiked. Trump is the piece of total putrid sheet that he is and nothing will ever change that. No POTUS in history would be as reckless as to shovel out this kind of pure sheet. When even his lackey Patel has to correct him it is worse than normal.

Someone needs Midol today. Too bad for you he is president for 1100 more days. It sounds like you need to go for a walk or golf 😂

2 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

It is all over mate and is a published article on the Daily Caller. You can find it all over the place like Newsweek, New York Times, Politico, UK sites, etc.

I never heard of that author before but he was speaking about retaliatory violence in self defense.

"A fat black lady assaults your on-camera talent? Book the kind of security that has no qualms hospitalizing her and people like her."

Sheet post from ya doc.

No he wasn't. He talked about clothslining someone because they took your sign as an example. That "self defense" is something added afterward by the website. He is an editor of the site and they ran the story so they own it as well.

Wake up dude.

Create an account or sign in to comment