Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

that's it, let your memories go back to the 80's and remember edward woodward.

He was great in Beauty Shop.

  • Replies 12.1k
  • Views 211.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

🚨🚨 i'm sharing a benny johnson twaat! roll holy sheet! cheeto's makeup is also perfecto!!!

1 hour ago, mr_hunt said:

🚨🚨 i'm sharing a benny johnson twaat! roll holy sheet! cheeto's makeup is also perfecto!!!

also dementia

you forgot to say dementia

13 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

Drain the swamp!

37 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

I'm sure DOGE won't miss this one.

But hunter pawned a laptop for crack

image.png

image.png

But deports US citizens guilty of nothing.

JFC what’s next….

12 hours ago, DBW said:

image.png

But deports US citizens guilty of nothing.

JFC what’s next….

Here what next

birthright citizenship in live oral arguments right now in SCOTUS, very interesting discussion with focus on nationwide injunctions which is what this case is about (i.e. not the merits of the actual case)

2025-05-15_11-17-02.jpg

yamato-sinking-ship.gif

On 5/7/2025 at 4:02 PM, toolg said:

I definitely put a lot of TopRocks in the pond and deep rough. ph34r

Rock Flights. Back when my dad use to work on a course he didn't even bother picking those f'ers up.

Played my first round (scramble) in 2 years on Monday. There are apparently back muscles I forgot about.

1 hour ago, DrPhilly said:

birthright citizenship in live oral arguments right now in SCOTUS, very interesting discussion with focus on nationwide injunctions which is what this case is about (i.e. not the merits of the actual case)

The injunction issue isn't the question at bar.

4 minutes ago, BBE said:

The injunction issue isn't the question at bar.

It is the base topic of the entire discussion which I’m listening to but you are right the case itself is only a question of whether or not to issue a stay against the earlier injunction

15 hours ago, DBW said:

But hunter pawned a laptop for crack

image.png

cheeto is for sale to the highest bidder, as usual. always has been…he’s just more blatant about it lately.

18 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

It is the base topic of the entire discussion which I’m listening to but you are right the case itself is only a question of whether or not to issue a stay against the earlier injunction

The ruling "should be limited" to lifting the injunction. The ability of a federal court to issue injunctions and the limitations and breadth is an entirely different matter of law.

Guess we will see just how Fed we are if the ruling is expanded to the admistration's request.

image.png

Darkstar with the 9 year old "headline"!

16 minutes ago, BBE said:

The ruling "should be limited" to lifting the injunction. The ability of a federal court to issue injunctions and the limitations and breadth is an entirely different matter of law.

Guess we will see just how Fed we are if the ruling is expanded to the admistration's request.

I think this ruling may very well set a bit of a precedent. They spent over 2 hours when it was set for 45 minutes and there was quite a bit of clear signaling by jurors to each other. It wasn't clear to me which way this one will go but it will definitely be a split decision and might very well be 5-4.

Seems to be going well

3 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

I think this ruling may very well set a bit of a precedent. They spent over 2 hours when it was set for 45 minutes and there was quite a bit of clear signaling by jurors to each other. It wasn't clear to me which way this one will go but it will definitely be a split decision and might very well be 5-4.

I don't have the time to listen to the arguments, but the Court should set aside the question for a separate hearing.

Screenshot 2025-05-15 at 19.08.50.png

One of my favorite exchanges that captures a good bit of the spirit presented by the differing viewpoints

17 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

hit

Create an account or sign in to comment