1 minute ago, BBE said:

No, that is not correct either.  Diehard has no understanding of Article III.

that's the thing, i think he does, he just doesn't care because it doesn't fit his narrative of sticking it to the other side. that's all that matters to him and others like him.

16 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

Ridiculous.  The Alien Enemies Act is to be used in actual war time situations which we clearly do not have at the moment.  It can't be any clearer.  Trump will lose this one in SCOTUS for sure.  Collect these asshats, give them actual due process, and then deport them the normal way.

...and more importantly don't defy federal judges.  Appeal their decisions and use impeachment proceedings if warranted.  We do NOT have a king.

This is a war and after being literally invaded by illegals and criminals he has the authority. 

So exactly what can the court do. . Hold someone in contempt ?  It certainly won’t be Trump.  Whatever the judge should proceed with what’s in his power to do so.

8 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

that's the thing, i think he does, he just doesn't care because it doesn't fit his narrative of sticking it to the other side. that's all that matters to him and others like him.

I'm not sticking it to anyone. I laugh at people like you but at the end of the day nobody on here gives a f what anyone says about them or their positions...or they shouldn't. There have been times when you can tell people are losing it or it's pushing them to the edge and I've backed off. Past someone literally having a breakdown or really being hurt it's just fun.

1 minute ago, Diehardfan said:

This is a war and after being literally invaded by illegals and criminals he has the authority. 

I'm going to chalk this one up as trolling.

4 minutes ago, Talkingbirds said:

So exactly what can the court do. . Hold someone in contempt ?  It certainly won’t be Trump.  Whatever the judge should proceed with what’s in his power to do so.

The judge can hold officials in personal contempt.  Of course Trump can pardon those officials.

..[A]n oral directive is not enforceable as an injunction."

Love it

Page after page of people engaging with diehard as if he inhabits the same reality as the rest of us and would ever say anything contrary to what the cult leader tells him to think.

John Hancock used an autopen!

Your asses are officially mine!

8 minutes ago, Arthur Jackson said:

John Hancock used an autopen!

Your asses are officially mine!

Shutup and sign over the Falklands and we can discuss Canada and the rest of the Commonwealth later

4 hours ago, Diehardfan said:

Once again, you are good with one branch acting lawless but expect another to just go along with it. Everything you just said shows you do not understand what is going on. There is lots of BS and fluff, but at the end of the day, you do not understand or, more likely, don't care because of TDS or a liberal agenda. Cute words like "patently against the founders' ideas" and "guard rails" while ignoring the judge driving over Article II. 

You're full of sh**. You wanting it to be true doesn't make it so. We're a nation of a Constitution and laws that hedge against the actions of a tyrant, and you want a tyrant to run amock.

4 hours ago, Diehardfan said:

LOL in one instance in international waters I'm glad he didn't. Going past that is you all making it so to distract from the BS rulings of these judges who want to overturn the election.

Keep crying.

3 hours ago, BBE said:

So, SCOTUS doesn't rule/over rule the lower court decision means the President can ignore it?  Think about what you are inferring. 

SCOTUS will only take the case if there is an error in the ruling or if the matter meets certain thresholds.  If the chose not to hear the case they will acknowledge the ruling of the lower court thus indicating the ruling is lawful.  

 

That is how the process works and you have displayed that you are not good with processes.

MAGAtards have decided they are pro-tyranny. 

I applaud your efforts. I tried to be reasonable with diehard for a long time. I'm done.

He's a spastic, emotional wreck of a man who would fit in better in Saudi Arabia or Russia.

3 hours ago, DrPhilly said:

I watched that and it was total rubbish.  Just a bunch of yelling by Levin but nothing of any actual sound legal analysis.  He didn't even try to offer any real legal argument, presumably because he is fully aware there is none that supports his position.

Levin is a ****.

8 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

MAGAtards have decided they are pro-tyranny. 

I applaud your efforts. I tried to be reasonable with diehard for a long time. I'm done.

He's a spastic, emotional wreck of a man who would fit in better in Saudi Arabia or Russia.

I remember he did a u-turn at one point and I'm betting that will happen again but not until it hits him personally.

3 hours ago, Diehardfan said:

You haven't displayed crap past fluffy words to cover your BS arguments. I'm happy to sit here all day as I play a round of golf. You think I'm full of crap. I think you are. We both get to sit and watch. I'm enjoying where it's going you aren't. Game on.

Just because you can't understand what he's saying doesn't mean they're "fluffy words"

1 minute ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

Just because you can't understand what he's saying doesn't mean they're "fluffy words"

The courts are all that is left now and so the full loony MAGA vitriol is being turned against them now.  The thing is Trump holds all the cards when you factor in pardons and his command of both the DOJ and the US Marshalls.  I think the game is over.

53 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

I think the game is over.

I trust them to do the right thing.  What happens after who knows.

 

2 hours ago, DrPhilly said:

I'm going to chalk this one up as trolling.

Not even a little. 

1 hour ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

Just because you can't understand what he's saying doesn't mean they're "fluffy words"

Oh I do, but verbose BS doesn't move the needle 

1 hour ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

Levin is a ****.

LoL....see I like you but we are miles apart politically. I'm good with that.

1 hour ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

MAGAtards have decided they are pro-tyranny. 

I applaud your efforts. I tried to be reasonable with diehard for a long time. I'm done.

He's a spastic, emotional wreck of a man who would fit in better in Saudi Arabia or Russia.

Yep, my moral compass is still on track. 

4 hours ago, Diehardfan said:

Not only am I right, but my side is in charge and winning.

Your side? 🤦‍♂️ This is one of many reasons you are an unAmerican POS, and wrong. 

19 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said:

Your side? 🤦‍♂️ This is one of many reasons you are an unAmerican POS, and wrong. 

Yep. My side vs the loons and traitors and POS trying to destroy the country from within. There isn't much middle ground anymore for a reason. Lucky for me the clock is being pushed back.

I've had my fun in here for the day. Enjoy your night.

1 hour ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

I tried to be reasonable with diehard for a long time. I'm done.

I'm genuinely confused as to how it's taken you this long to realize it. Even after he attacked Bill in the Russia thread and called him a sucker for fighting in Ukraine. Actually bashing someone else for putting everything on the line to try to save the lives of other helpless people, and diehard's deranged and permanently damaged brain literally decides to call him a sucker for it. 

Then when called out on it, instead of saying, "ya know what, my bad, I shouldn't have said that, my emotions got the best of me" he instead doubles down. Just like they always do. It's the Trump motto: never admit fault, always double down.

Why anyone sees all this from diehard and still thinks there might be a normal, sane person inside of him is what baffles me more than anything. Maybe there was at one point, but that person is long gone now and there ain't no turning back.