7 minutes ago, Eriv20 said:

Mcvay was pissed about Puca tweeting after the game. Do you think Rams fans want to trade him now? 😆

I don’t get fans crying about the backwards pass. It was literally behind the LOS

13 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Hypothetically if the rams, Seahawks, niners and bears all finish 13-4 who gets the 1 seed? I think it would be SF cause they’d be 11-2 in conference record whereas bears would be 10-3 and rams/seahawks 8-4 (SF would also be 5-1 in their division). Would also mean either Seattle or rams would be the 6 seed

All moot (even as a hypothetical). 🙃

Because we ae going to win out and the 3-ish other things we need to happen still (Rams lose to Seattle, we win out) Green Bay beats Chicago and what else? Each loses one more or some ish.)

Just now, jamiller said:

All moot (even as a hypothetical). 🙃

Because we ae going to win out and the 3-ish other things we need to happen still (Rams lose to Seattle, we win out) Green Bay beats Chicago and what else? Each loses one more or some ish.)

For the eagles to get the 1 seed:

— eagles win out

— rams lose one or both of final 2 games (at Atlanta and vs. Az)

— Seahawks have to lose their final 2 games (at Carolina and at SF)

— packers lose at least 1 of last 3 (at bears, vs. baltimore and at Minnesota)

— bears lose at least 2 of last 3 games (vs. packers, at SF, vs. lions)

— SF loses 2 of 3 (at colts, vs. bears and vs. Seattle)

Time for the Eagles to disappoint a lot of people and just...

10 minutes ago, NOTW said:

Another game I put on mute after hearing Herbstreit saying about 6 times how the Rams "just need another 16 yards” to get in FG range, after the Rams kicker literally missed a 47-yard FG the previous possession. They are a woefully bad tandem in the booth.

40 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Hypothetically if the rams, Seahawks, niners and bears all finish 13-4 who gets the 1 seed? I think it would be SF cause they’d be 11-2 in conference record whereas bears would be 10-3 and rams/seahawks 8-4 (SF would also be 5-1 in their division). Would also mean either Seattle or rams would be the 6 seed

First you would resolve the 3-way tie in the NFCW and then compare that one NFCW team to the Bears. For the Niners to get to 13-4 they would have beaten the Seahawks head to head. The Rams and Seahawks split the head to head. The Niners and the Rams also split.

That eliminates the Seahawks. So the Rams and Niners move to Division record and the Niners have only 1 Division loss and the Rams have 2, so the Niners win the NFCW.

Now the Niners and Bears can’t both be 13-4 because they play each other on 12/28 and the loser of that game will have 5 losses. So if the Niners really are 13-4, then the best the Bears can be is 12-5.

Had to share this came up on my feed

Regarding the discussion about college QB readiness for NFL and learning.

42 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

For the eagles to get the 1 seed:

— eagles win out

— rams lose one or both of final 2 games (at Atlanta and vs. Az)

— Seahawks have to lose their final 2 games (at Carolina and at SF)

— packers lose at least 1 of last 3 (at bears, vs. baltimore and at Minnesota)

— bears lose at least 2 of last 3 games (vs. packers, at SF, vs. lions)

— SF loses 2 of 3 (at colts, vs. bears and vs. Seattle)

I don't think we need to care about that

I wonder why eagles/commanders only Saturday game

50 minutes ago, pisceschica said:

I wonder why eagles/commanders only Saturday game

Packers/Bears

Oh, this is a blow out, I'm going to sleep early. Durrrrr!