14 minutes ago, hukdonfoniks said:

I really, really don't want to go to Seattle if we can avoid it. It's not even a fear of the team, but for whatever reason we just can't play a full four-quarter game there.

If it makes you feel better, they haven’t played a full 4 quarter game most anywhere they played. Aside from maybe the Raiders and 2nd Giants game.

1 minute ago, ManuManu said:

Patullo might not be any good at this.

He would have definitely dominated the game had they just handed him the ball 10 more times.

It's infuriating and I don't even care about the playoff seeding. To me its just another blown opportunity to show that you have a competent coaching staff and program.

Go win the damn game, have your cake and eat it too. But no, we have to pump up those McKee numbers up!

I'd rather the Bears win. That way we would avoid the Rams until the CG.

2 minutes ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

I am actually surprised that the Bears lost. That said, I am not afraid of going there in the division round after we somehow or other beat the amazing Niners.

I’m not at all surprised they beat Chicago. Campbell won’t let his team lay down. That’s a great culture he built up there. If we somehow won in Chicago it wouldn’t be some major surprise, but we made things much harder for ourselves.

I'm more afraid of stupid playcalling hurting us in a game than any particular team. I think Vics defense can win us games or keep us from getting blown out. Though I worry they'd get tired from having to do it so much

22 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

I kind of doubt it. If he does he’s likely getting fired with Patullo cause i can’t imagine if the offense is awful in the playoffs that lurie is giving Patullo a second year as OC. As for sirianni doubtful he gets a better HC opportunity with a loaded roster like the eagles if he goes down with the Patullo ship. Whatever job he gets next he’s not having a stacked roster like Howie gave him since 2022 and probably will continue to do.

"If"
The potential difference I can see in this offense is hurts understanding that he's going to have to use his legs more. Whether its taking lanes when plays break down or being ok with more designed runs for him. But the eagles are going to field the same play not to lose offense they have this whole season.

Shocker. Idiot stands by his idiotic decision. Go f yourself Siri

Just now, Connecticut Eagle said:

I'd rather the Bears win. That way we would avoid the Rams until the CG.

I'd rather play the Rams at home than Bears on the road. If you're gonna play the Rams anyway then might as well get them out of the way early. Give me Stafford in the cold in Philly. I think the Bears are a worse team, but they match up well because they have a very good run game and Caleb presents problems with his mobility. It's a close call though.

Would be awesome if Panthers can upset the Rams again.

25 minutes ago, DawkinsOwnage03 said:

Why is everyone afraid of the 49ers coming here?

Not afraid but I think they have enough to beat the eagles.

6 minutes ago, Maga301 said:

Definitely agree that resting was organizational. But this offensive philosophy gets us however far it will in the playoffs and after that you dump KP immediately and get experience back in here. Then take a deeper dive into position coaches because I was very disappointed in our backups on both sides of the ball.

I figure patullo is gone at the end of the year unless the offense just explodes during the playoffs. I highly doubt it cause it hasn’t for 17 games.

Today the offense stunk. Some of that is you ar playing with all backups besides the first drive with Devonta and then pulled steen. Patullo stinks and the offense still has the same issues today as it did yesterday. That said also dealing with guys we hope we don’t have to play like Kendall, Fred Johnson, Williams, Pryor and Toth got hurt so really into backups. should’ve given tank more touches and utilized him. Also should know that the drop off from Devonta and aj brown is massive. I like cooper as a developmental project but he’s not ready for a bigger role. Imo Dotson is a 3rd wr for a reason. Hes not a starter. It’s why i argued getting rid of aj brown and just replacing him with Dotson isn’t a great plan.

The offense was an issue tonight per usual, but I would still argue th defense had chances to get off the field, and their corners (and brown) were so bad that they just continue drives for the commanders. if the commanders were smart, they would’ve just thrown the ball every single time because Ringo and Bennett were gonna get a penalty on 1st, 2nd or 3rd down. Neither one of those guys know what the hell to do out there. Which we could say part of that is coaching, but I tend to think that both of these guys just JAGs that aren’t able to utilize what they are taught and use it on the field. Specifically Ringo, who has been here now 3 years is still doing things and making mistakes that a rookie in training camp would do

2 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:

He would have definitely dominated the game had they just handed him the ball 10 more times.

It's infuriating and I don't even care about the playoff seeding. To me its just another blown opportunity to show that you have a competent coaching staff and program.

Go win the damn game, have your cake and eat it too. But no, we have to pump up those McKee numbers up!

I guess Patullo was tired of running the ball to just run the ball

I really do wonder if the goal going into the game was to showcase McKee to boost his trade value, they also failed at that...☹️

They keep asking him the same question in different ways. 🤣

Shanahan is definitely a coaching advantage over Siri.

Just now, Uscg-green said:

They keep asking him the same question in different ways. 🤣

Because the reporters suck

3 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

I'm more afraid of stupid playcalling hurting us in a game than any particular team. I think Vics defense can win us games or keep us from getting blown out. Though I worry they'd get tired from having to do it so much

We’re probably going to lose because of the offense. That’s not me being negative. It’s just the obvious projection. I’m hoping we go on a magical run which is still very possible

My optimistic take, trying to think positively:

• The defensive starters got rest after playing a lot of snaps. They come back hungry, and fueled by cheering on the backup defense who played really well and with intensity.

• The O line with some rest, returning Lane Johnson, and Fred Johnson being used as that 6th linemen for blocking to help the run game can help establish the run and help the struggling pass game

• Hurts is clutch, we've seen that

• Last year even with Kellen Moore the offense had its ups and downs and concerns, then turned it on at the right time.

• Have to hope Siri lets loose and doesn't play quite as conservative

• The defense will create turnovers, putting the O line good position. They just need to execute (I know, asking a lot these days)

The NFC field is overrated, it's the Eagles to take if they step up. I know, "if." Trying to be positive and hopeful.

This season has definitely proven (again) the need for an experienced play caller at OC so there will be a change there. This offense has too good a roster to not perform and no it's not all because of the QB only absolute morons think that. They need a change at OC and this offense will perform.

2 minutes ago, pisceschica said:

"If"
The potential difference I can see in this offense is hurts understanding that he's going to have to use his legs more. Whether its taking lanes when plays break down or being ok with more designed runs for him. But the eagles are going to field the same play not to lose offense they have this whole season.

The one thing I will say is this, the Eagles have not run Jalen hurts as much this year and he’s as healthy as he’s been entering the playoffs in his time here. I have a feeling that when the playoffs come around and they know it’s win or go home that they’re gonna utilize his legs more and he will too.

Whether or not that makes the offense massively better, I don’t know. I still don’t think Pattulo knows what he’s doing. Per today it still felt like this offense it’s just picking plays at random instead of seeing what the defense is giving you, knowing the situation and using plays for the situation. The reason why I say that it was 3 and 3 late in the 4th and we’re taking a shot down the field. You’re just trying to pick up the first down to keep your chances alive. yet we are choosing plays trying to score quickly and beat starters on the commanders with backups. Furthermore just get the first. We want to score with as little time left as possible so can make the decision to go for 2 or go to OT and the commanders don’t have time to win it in regulation.

DraftKings has us as 3 point favorites.

He just said half will agree with his decision and half will be against it. Silly Siri..... It's way more than half.

9 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:

He would have definitely dominated the game had they just handed him the ball 10 more times.

It's infuriating and I don't even care about the playoff seeding. To me its just another blown opportunity to show that you have a competent coaching staff and program.

Go win the damn game, have your cake and eat it too. But no, we have to pump up those McKee numbers up!

We had to save him for his two weekly snaps when Barkley is active.

3 minutes ago, pgcd3 said:

We’re probably going to lose because of the offense. That’s not me being negative. It’s just the obvious projection. I’m hoping we go on a magical run which is still very possible

I’d be really surprised if we lost because of the defense. Frankly probably going to give us a chance in every game. Even the bears game we had a shot at 10-9 to go up in that game because of them. And they were getting gashed on the ground.

28 minutes ago, pgcd3 said:

Let’s just all agree that Patullo is the biggest problem.

Some of you are mad that Nick isn’t helping O more but I just don’t view that as his job and I’m ok with that.

But who hired Patullo?! Who has allowed offensive woes go on for 4 months?

If Nick is honest with himself he's clearly shown he's not good at designing/calling plays or hiring a competent OC for a team coming off of a SB win? So why did he make the same mistake he made in 2023? Its absolutely his fault.

3 minutes ago, pgcd3 said:

We’re probably going to lose because of the offense. That’s not me being negative. It’s just the obvious projection. I’m hoping we go on a magical run which is still very possible

Can you think of an offense with this kind of talent on paper that struggles? It's such a waste of resources

1 minute ago, NOTW said:

My optimistic take, trying to think positively:

• The defensive starters got rest after playing a lot of snaps. They come back hungry, and fueled by cheering on the backup defense who played really well and with intensity.

• The O line with some rest, returning Lane Johnson, and Fred Johnson being used as that 6th linemen for blocking to help the run game can help establish the run and help the struggling pass game

• Hurts is clutch, we've seen that

• Last year even with Kellen Moore the offense had its ups and downs and concerns, then turned it on at the right time.

• Have to hope Siri lets loose and doesn't play quite as conservative

• The defense will create turnovers, putting the O line good position. They just need to execute (I know, asking a lot these days)

The NFC field is overrated, it's the Eagles to take if they step up. I know, "if." Trying to be positive and hopeful.

This season has definitely proven (again) the need for an experienced play caller at OC so there will be a change there. This offense has too good a roster to not perform and no it's not all because of the QB only absolute morons think that. They need a change at OC and this offense will perform.

I was flipping to the Lions-Bears game and caught the moment when KB asked Brady who is the team no one is talking about and he named the Eagles. Ton of talent, have been there before, have the ability to turn it on if needed.