November 15Nov 15 11 minutes ago, 315Eagles said:Why?because I dont care to pay more to have that service bundled in.
November 15Nov 15 14 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:because I dont care to pay more to have that service bundled in.It is already in the works for YT TV. Just dont know if its soon or next year.
November 15Nov 15 Just now, 315Eagles said:It is already in the works for YT TV. Just dont know if its soon or next year.that was one of the major sticking points in negotiations. Its a 30 dollar a month streaming service. YTTV didnt want to have to increase prices on everyone and wanted instead to make it an optional add on. Disney wants it bundled in automatically for everyone to increase their subscriber numbers. I hope Youtube won.
November 15Nov 15 1 hour ago, HazletonEagle said:that was one of the major sticking points in negotiations. Its a 30 dollar a month streaming service. YTTV didnt want to have to increase prices on everyone and wanted instead to make it an optional add on. Disney wants it bundled in automatically for everyone to increase their subscriber numbers.I hope Youtube won.Supposedly they settled on including it for no additional cost.
November 15Nov 15 24 minutes ago, BDawk_ASamuel said:Save this for the next time there’s an awful call
November 15Nov 15 Just now, pallidrone said:Supposedly they settled on including it for no additional cost.Nice!! big win. I love ESPN Unlimited now!
November 15Nov 15 16 minutes ago, pallidrone said:Supposedly they settled on including it for no additional cost.All the streaming services added ESPN unlimited at no extra cost. So makes sense.
November 15Nov 15 Are we hoping the Rams and Seahawks split or Rams sweep them? Rams have some challenging games but for the Seahawks this is really it outside of a home game against the Colts. Colts aren't going into Seattle and winning that game though. Seahawks have 2 NFC losses and have lost to the the Bucs who we beat. So at least one loss to the Rams will give us a common opponents benefit and also NFC record. But if they split then we can only really lose 1 more game. I think we need the Rams to sweep the Seahawks then hope Rams lose to Bucs and/or Lions to give us some room for error.
November 15Nov 15 Root for the Rams this week and figure it out from there. No need to worry about the rematch until things play out and you know what’s what.
November 15Nov 15 Seahawks to sweep the Rams and then root for a loss to the Colts, Vikings, or both.OR the Rams lose to Seattle then lose to Tampa, Detroit, or both then beat Seattle.I will take either but I hope the Seahawks win by 30 this week so the media stops slurping for a bit.
November 15Nov 15 3 minutes ago, SkippyX said:Seahawks to sweep the Rams and then root for a loss to the Colts, Vikings, or both.OR the Rams lose to Seattle then lose to Tampa, Detroit, or both then beat Seattle.I will take either but I hope the Seahawks win by 30 this week so the media stops slurping for a bit.If the Seahawks sweep the Rams I can't see them losing more than one game and possibly winning out.That also means they are legit. Right now there is a paper tiger possibility with them since their best wins so far are over the Jags and Steelers while the other teams with winning records have beat them: 49ers and Bucs.Also if the Eagles don't get the #1 seed and it goes to the winner of the NFC West, I like the Eagles ability to go into LA and win much more than Seattle. LA game could be more Eagles fans. Rooting for Rams.
November 15Nov 15 2 hours ago, RememberTheKoy said:Are we hoping the Rams and Seahawks split or Rams sweep them? Rams have some challenging games but for the Seahawks this is really it outside of a home game against the Colts. Colts aren't going into Seattle and winning that game though.Seahawks have 2 NFC losses and have lost to the the Bucs who we beat. So at least one loss to the Rams will give us a common opponents benefit and also NFC record. But if they split then we can only really lose 1 more game. I think we need the Rams to sweep the Seahawks then hope Rams lose to Bucs and/or Lions to give us some room for error.Interesting. I was thinking split but this makes more sense. A split is good but this is better.
November 15Nov 15 Issue with the Seahawks is that the Eagles play like absolute crap there when they are good.
November 15Nov 15 14 hours ago, aptosbird said:Wow...LaPorta is a big piece for Goff. Does Quinton focus on St Brown?"Quinton"? "Forget it....he's on a roll......"
November 15Nov 15 My draft crush all year has been Sadiq but I need to get over it. He's not falling to the Eagles. I've been clamoring for a TE for years to replace Goedert and be TE2 in the meantime. No more settling for 6th round TE, UDFA or TE3/4 type of players.
November 15Nov 15 16 hours ago, NOTW said:Back to normal. I suspect you knew what the outcome would be before you made the long post.
November 15Nov 15 18 hours ago, HazletonEagle said:You shouldnt have wasted your time... its nonsense. Its completely ignorant of many facts. And its wrong.Classic, and of of course you've already stated all the facts in here before so you won't be offering any examples.
November 15Nov 15 1 hour ago, NYEagle said:How f'ing hot is Kay Adams?!?!?!?she was way hotter before all the plastic surgery, which is saying something because, damn.
November 15Nov 15 23 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:Classic, and of of course you've already stated all the facts in here before so you won't be offering any examples. You wake up in a fighty mood today?
Create an account or sign in to comment