September 26, 20205 yr 1 minute ago, M.C. said: I've been waiting to use this one: https://babylonbee.com/news/poll-majority-of-evangelicals-would-support-satan-if-he-ran-as-republican-candidate 😈😈😈😈👹👹👹👹👹👺👺👺👺👺 It’s funny because it’s true. But also, the maskless rallies where they all give each other Covid are something even Satanists wouldn’t do.
September 26, 20205 yr Author 14 minutes ago, vikas83 said: I miss the days when qualifications are what really mattered. When SCOTUS nominees were confirmed overwhelmingly. Hell, even Roberts was 78-22 (22 yes votes from Democrats). Kagan and Sotomayor both broke 60. And Ginsburg got 96. Unfortunately, SCOTUS is now a super legislature. The days of good faith legal readings are over.
September 26, 20205 yr 6 hours ago, TEW said: This. If you’re going to reject the nominee, just do it through formal proceedings as it should be done. There is nothing untoward about doing this. Exactly. I agree with Vikas. Same opinion I had in 2016. You, on the other hand, argued repeatedly in 2016 that the Repubs were in their right. What Trump and the Senate should not do is rush the process. It should be carried out with the normal level of due diligence. The unfortunate timing of RBG passing may very likely turn out to be the final straw in this political mess. Trump will no doubt attempt to move the election to the courts and if he succeeds and wins in the SCOTUS the integrity of the country will be completely broken. Right now it is hanging by a chad thread.
September 26, 20205 yr 7 hours ago, DrPhilly said: Exactly. I agree with Vikas. Same opinion I had in 2016. You, on the other hand, argued repeatedly in 2016 that the Repubs were in their right. What Trump and the Senate should not do is rush the process. It should be carried out with the normal level of due diligence. The unfortunate timing of RBG passing may very likely turn out to be the final straw in this political mess. Trump will no doubt attempt to move the election to the courts and if he succeeds and wins in the SCOTUS the integrity of the country will be completely broken. Right now it is hanging by a chad thread. Just out of curiosity, how do you think the left would handle the situation?
September 26, 20205 yr 1 minute ago, Cthulhu said: Just out of curiosity, how do you think the left would handle the situation? Like sheet
September 26, 20205 yr 2 minutes ago, Cthulhu said: Just out of curiosity, how do you think the left would handle the situation?
September 26, 20205 yr Author 11 hours ago, DrPhilly said: Exactly. I agree with Vikas. Same opinion I had in 2016. You, on the other hand, argued repeatedly in 2016 that the Repubs were in their right. What Trump and the Senate should not do is rush the process. It should be carried out with the normal level of due diligence. The unfortunate timing of RBG passing may very likely turn out to be the final straw in this political mess. Trump will no doubt attempt to move the election to the courts and if he succeeds and wins in the SCOTUS the integrity of the country will be completely broken. Right now it is hanging by a chad thread. I argued that it was legal, not that it was "right.”
September 26, 20205 yr 33 minutes ago, TEW said: I argued that it was legal, not that it was "right.” No you said it was both.
September 27, 20205 yr I couldn’t like this article more. Liberal author focused on the fact that he knows Barrett to be a brilliant legal mind and good person who is more than qualified. In a perfect world, there would be a lot more of this.
September 27, 20205 yr There's always something. Handmaids Tale cult that kidnaps babies in illegal adoptions is Wayfair/Pizza Gate type stuff.
September 27, 20205 yr 12 hours ago, vikas83 said: I couldn’t like this article more. Liberal author focused on the fact that he knows Barrett to be a brilliant legal mind and good person who is more than qualified. In a perfect world, there would be a lot more of this. DRP approves this message
September 29, 20205 yr 24K likes. This is a great analogy for today's discourse. These people literally knew nothing about ACB a week ago, but because she's a conservative, she's automatically a racist analogous to slave owners. lmao, mental illness.
September 29, 20205 yr 6 minutes ago, Kz! said: 24K likes. This is a great analogy for today's discourse. These people literally knew nothing about ACB a week ago, but because she's a conservative, she's automatically a racist analogous to slave owners. lmao, mental illness. It really is
October 14, 20214 yr 2 hours ago, lynched1 said: Couric is just outing everybody. That's a lot of Courics...
October 14, 20214 yr 3 hours ago, lynched1 said: Couric is just outing everybody. Lol, turns out RBG wasn’t as woke as everybody wishes she was. "She probably didn’t understand the question” was one take trying to defend a non-woke RGB answer…..if only Supreme Court Justices could understand questions better.
October 14, 20214 yr Good to hear. Hopefully it’ll make the far left stop deifying the woman that single handedly handed the court to the right for the foreseeable future.
October 14, 20214 yr 45 minutes ago, Shakenbake36 said: Lol, turns out RBG wasn’t as woke as everybody wishes she was. "She probably didn’t understand the question” was one take trying to defend a non-woke RGB answer…..if only Supreme Court Justices could understand questions better. Seemed quite lucid in the interview. Far more so than Brandon.
December 17, 20223 yr On 9/20/2020 at 6:09 PM, Diehardfan said: Say it with me...6 to 3 🙂 Well, 5 1/2 with Roberts. Say it with me, Biden is your president.
December 17, 20223 yr 1 hour ago, Boogyman said: Say it with me, Biden is your president. I appreciate the fan mail from over 2 years ago. That's something I admitted election night after wishing everyone well.
Create an account or sign in to comment